4chan archive /lgbt/ (index)
2014-07-19 07:23 3017811 Anonymous (1239131116223.jpg 182x195 7kB)
So I just topped a guy without a condom. What is the HIV risk for a top? I'm kind of freaking out now...

3 min later 3017815 Anonymous
why? can someone please explain to me why so many gay men are against protection or never use it

7 min later 3017835 Anonymous
>>3017815 hiv needs help spreading

1 hours later 3018230 Anonymous (asfasssa.png 569x314 18kB)
>>3017811 You dumbass. Go get PEP just to be safe.

1 hours later 3018249 Anonymous
>>3018230 What are the factors being used? Is this with a known infected partner, or just per act in general with partners whose status is unknown? The problem with these figures is that there's too much to take into consideration. For instance, if you're having unprotected sex with a known infected partner, but they're on a consistent antiretroviral regimen and their viral load is undetectable, the risk is possibly extremely low. Most people who are infected are likely going to be on medication.

1 hours later 3018251 Anonymous
>>3018230 Oh wow, those are a lot lower than I thought they were. ... I hope that doesn't change my behavior from now on.

1 hours later 3018259 Anonymous
>>3018249 >Is this with a known infected partner If the other person doesn't have HIV, the chance is always 0%.. With unknown, you'd have to adapt it to the percentage of the population that has HIV. In the US for gay males, it's assumed it's either 10 or 20%.

1 hours later 3018268 Anonymous
here we go >HIV thread no. 81881 fuck you faggot, it's your own life and your own risk, but that doesn't give you the rigth to shit up this board with your fucking problems >gay people ugh, scum of the earth

1 hours later 3018312 Anonymous (DisneyNoCurr.gif 297x195 376kB)
>>3018268 oh look it's that homophobic tranny from earlier you should probably go talk about hormones some more, endless threads about hormones don't shit up this board

13 hours later 3021072 Anonymous
>>3017811 an hero anon <3

13 hours later 3021084 Anonymous
>>3018251 For reference, these numbers are close to the probability of getting pregnant.

13 hours later 3021089 ljse
>>3018251 you aren't supposed to be going out fucking random faggots anyway most gay people are shit, you'r'e not gonna be able to find anybody worth being within 5 feet of in any short amount of time

13 hours later 3021097 Anonymous
>>3018251 A small percentage of the gay population is responsible for a large percentage of the HIV. Needle use and casual sex percentages tend to crossover and things get muddy. Those that do not get involved in the 'gay community' and never visit gay bars or have casual sex will have less than a 99.98% chance of getting HIV. You would have to be exceedingly unlucky to get HIV if you're a responsible person 100% of the time. It's the slipups that get people.

13 hours later 3021108 Anonymous
>>3021097 The way a lot of these dudes on here talk about how much gay sex they're having, it baffles me how none of them are concerned about HIV. Made me really glad to be just barely virgin status.

13 hours later 3021114 Anonymous
>>3021108 The majority of studies are conducted at gay related event, it's the only way to gather 40,000 gay people afterall. By simply avoiding that shit you avoid so many horrible things it's just unbelievable. Don't go to pride, don't go to gay bars, don't slut around on gay apps, don't date people that do the aforementioned, and voila, you'll never get aids, you're basically in the same league as straight people

3.981 0.073