4chan archive /sci/ (index)
similar threads
2014-11-08 08:28 6862094 Anonymous (plz buy filters.jpg 625x468 78kB)
/sci/ is the second smartest board so I ask you, what is the science behind Water Filters? If I live in a 1st world country (Canada) do I need filters, have they been proven to help? Are the health benefits noticeable, empirically sound?

5 min later 6862103 Anonymous
If you're getting water from a federally (or whatever Canada calls it) regulated municipal water supply then water filters can improve the taste, they can remove other things but there is nothing in the water to be concerned about if it's properly treated.

10 min later 6862114 Anonymous
Canada Fag here fucking Google it you lazy fuck. Run off from farming is bad so is pill poopers pissing it back into are water supply. Hence why i have a water filter that is 100,000 of inch that traps chemicals

12 min later 6862117 Anonymous
>>6862114 Canada still stuck in the 1980's don't you guys ozonate your water?

14 min later 6862125 Anonymous
>>6862117 No. Well maybe in colling wood Ontario. They did have the world most advanced water filter system in the world back in 2005

15 min later 6862127 Anonymous
>>6862114 >fucking Google it >get hundreds of retarded conspiracy theory sites great idea, retard

16 min later 6862129 Anonymous
>>6862094 Water filters is a large category. Since you're asking about personal filtration I'll assume you mean filters like Brita filters and similar. Does your water taste bad? Is it very hard? The Brita filters are perfect for you. They remove some bad tastes and will reduce the hardness of the water. Are you an in Africa and need to filter your shit out of your drinking water? Bria filters are not for you. They do not filter all toxic chemicals and they do not kill microbes. They should only be used with safe tap water. Whether it's worth it is up to you.

21 min later 6862139 Anonymous
>>6862094 What is the smartest board? Surely it isn't /b/.

21 min later 6862141 Anonymous
>>6862094 what's the first smartest board

28 min later 6862149 Anonymous
>>6862094 In pretty sure the water company filters it for you.

31 min later 6862154 Anonymous
>>6862127 Here's a good start http://scholar.google.com/

33 min later 6862155 Anonymous
>>6862139 /diy/

1 hours later 6862286 Anonymous (aaaaaaaaaah.gif 358x306 2445kB)
>>6862114 >are water supply

1 hours later 6862308 Anonymous
>>6862141 /pol/ obviously Red Pill Knowledge > Actual knowledge prove me wrong

2 hours later 6862322 Anonymous (alex jones shill and fucking filters.jpg 500x448 71kB)
>>6862094 >If I live in a 1st world country (Canada) do I need filters, have they been proven to help? You don't need them. I also live in Canada but I buy water bottles for a water cooler at Costco so I don't actually drink tap water at all. >Are the health benefits noticeable, empirically sound? Not really. I don't like chlorine taste and I like my water chilled so I have a water cooler. ps; this is a better Insane Jones pic. >>6862139 pretty sure it's /pol/

2 hours later 6862333 Anonymous
>>6862094 Distil and re-balance with chelated minerals.

2 hours later 6862336 Anonymous
>>6862308 I want to. But I can't

4 hours later 6862546 Anonymous (prokuror_10.jpg 700x458 46kB)
>>6862139 >>6862141 It's /pol/. then /lit/+/sci/ tied for second.

5 hours later 6862571 Anonymous
>>6862546 what a smart board. They worship a girl and make anime drawings of her. Truly the most intelligent board.

5 hours later 6862575 Anonymous
>>6862546 >/lit/ >intelligent Proclaiming how great House of Leaves is while masturbating to how guilty they feel for white privilege doesn't constitute intelligence. >>6862571 That was /int/ you faggot.

5 hours later 6862576 Anonymous
>>6862575 it was /pol/ faggot. /pol/ masturbate at this all day. Also, is this a joke? How /pol/ is the smartest board? It's /b/ 2.0.

5 hours later 6862587 Anonymous
>>6862576 >Also, is this a joke? How /pol/ is the smartest board? It's /b/ 2.0. It clearly isn't, and I think you're mistaking cynical banter with "A HURR DURR MUH MEMES" shit that is prevalent everywhere else. I don't agree with the prevalent political views there, but at least I'm not blinkered like you in realising that it's a board where argument and discussion takes place. /pol/, /sci/, and /lit/ are the only places to go if you want actual SERIOUS discussions. The transport boards - /o/, /n/ - are good too but are too niche.

5 hours later 6862591 Anonymous
>>6862141 Probably /diy/.

5 hours later 6862593 Anonymous
>>6862587 I agrew with that, but is really hard to get a serious discussion in /pol/. It only happens like once in a week. If you filter le fanny maymays and all the usual links shills like to post then it becomes a good board. Also, I don't think posting infographics with no source is a serious discussion,

5 hours later 6862597 Anonymous
>>6862591 It's good now, but in the first few weeks it was nothing but Homemade Dildo threads all day erry day.

5 hours later 6862626 Anonymous (1393380885681.jpg 1000x1000 47kB)
>/pol/ smartest board This is some newfag tier trolling

6 hours later 6862631 Anonymous
>>6862597 Every board has a stage like that.

7 hours later 6862711 Anonymous
>>6862626 Yeah, like "Is 0.999... equal to 0?" threads and "Math major here, $500k starting." threads are any better.

7 hours later 6862720 Anonymous (ghack.jpg 580x339 100kB)
>>6862141 /g/

8 hours later 6862764 Anonymous
>>6862587 /pol/ is littered with overly impressionable and easily manipulated lemmings really. Look at this random thread where they haven't figured out it's an advertisement for a particular pornstar disguised as a satirical thread: >>>/pol/38393797

8 hours later 6862775 Anonymous
>>6862597 They've moved on to more technological things these days: >>>/diy/721757

8 hours later 6862777 Anonymous (1409003157610.jpg 960x811 204kB)
>>6862155 seconded.

8 hours later 6862781 Anonymous
>>6862094 >second smartest

8 hours later 6862782 Anonymous
>>6862129 >shitting in your drinking water Why do they do it?

8 hours later 6862784 Anonymous
>>6862764 you probably started that thread. it was also removed. they're the only board on here where you're allowed to say what you really think. anything that's even slightly controversial is removed from this board (and other boards as well).

8 hours later 6862785 Anonymous
>>6862777 so does it really take 2000 amps to turn a wrench into slag?

8 hours later 6862789 Anonymous
>>6862785 I wouldn't know what the resistance is on one of those, even at .5 ohms it would be dissipating a fair bit of power.

8 hours later 6862795 Anonymous
lol you think pol is smart? Holy shit get some standards

8 hours later 6862805 Anonymous
>>6862094 It removes large particles, I have one on my shower because the water here is 30% calcium residue

8 hours later 6862807 Anonymous
>>6862789 dammit, am I going to have to do some math to figure this out?

8 hours later 6862810 Anonymous
>>6862782 They don't. The main cause of microbial pollution comes from animals. Unless your waterway is on the border of a very large civilization, like how the Ganges river runs through two different major Indian cities.

8 hours later 6862811 Anonymous
>>6862807 You just need the resistance of a wrench. Find yourself a very precise ohmmeter and test it yourself

8 hours later 6862813 Anonymous (1409000871846.jpg 960x720 110kB)
>>6862807 I^2*R, so about 2MWatts being dissipated (@I=2000, R=0.5). I might be wrong though, I want to know myself. >>6862811 brb

8 hours later 6862821 Anonymous (1409000809254.jpg 800x514 76kB)
>>6862811 my shitty, brandless, precisionless, inaccurate multimeter said 2.3 ohms across a medium ratchet, with 1.8 of them in the leads. Perhaps my initial estimate wasn't too far off.

9 hours later 6862839 Anonymous
>second smartest I feel offended. None of the other boards have anyone with a Ph.D in triple integrals, which by itself just puts us as the smartest board.

9 hours later 6862840 Anonymous (IMG_2790_75.jpg 1836x2448 1531kB)
>>6862813 That is just scary.

9 hours later 6862847 Anonymous (1415311647797.jpg 438x717 69kB)
>>6862839 >mfw I started the Phd in triple integrals meme years ago... >mfw /sci/ really hasn't progressed at all

9 hours later 6862848 Anonymous
>>6862546 >it's /pol/ Some of the biggest retards on this planet, yourself included probably, go to that board. Are you kidding me?

9 hours later 6862849 Anonymous
>>6862784 >>they're the only board on here where you're allowed to say what you really think >saying what you think = intelligence poltards

9 hours later 6862859 Anonymous
>>6862847 >not progressed I don't see the board full of jacob barnett threads anymore like 3 years ago. That's a huge improvement.

9 hours later 6862862 Anonymous
>>6862847 And here you are. You've come such a long way.

9 hours later 6862863 Anonymous
>>6862775 man, this is the 4chan I love

9 hours later 6862872 Anonymous
>>6862863 >i want to show you my last project: Scrotum Warmer. If you warm the testicles every day at 42 degrees for about 40 minutes, you become sterile. A new easy contraceptive. That's what I expect from the smartest board.

10 hours later 6862899 Anonymous
>>6862848 >Are you kidding me? He's serious, and he's correct.

10 hours later 6862906 Anonymous
>>6862094 At least in Toronto, homes built before the 50s can have lead water service or fixtures. In Toronto it's ~10% of the housing stock. If that's your situation you would definitely want a faucet-mounted filter rated for lead.

10 hours later 6862909 Anonymous
>canada why don't you drink water from molten ice...

10 hours later 6862914 Anonymous
>>6862909 >molten ice Is that like solid lava

10 hours later 6862923 Anonymous (09bcc3a1-e4e3-4553-abd2-125eea5e8.jpg 860x158 48kB)
>>6862782 you know that the water in your toilet is the same water that comes out of your faucet, right? we shit in our drinking water too. the difference is we are able to filter it that good that it's safe to drink it again.

11 hours later 6862933 Anonymous
Incidents like Walkerton aside, and with the exception of some reserves (which, let's face it, are basically third world countries), tap water in Canada is always safe to drink. Most of the water you buy in bottles at the grocery store comes directly from municipal tap water supplies. Every once in a while, the fire department will flush out all the hydrants and stuff, and you'll get a lot of silt for a day or two. It's harmless but kind of annoying; a filter might be useful then. Or just pour your water into a jug and let the sediment settle out, then pour it into a glass. The only places I've ever lived where I might regularly consider using filters are in Alberta. Down south, sometimes you get flooding that can contaminate municipal supplies. And way up in the oil/gas fields, sometimes you'll get some methane/sulphides dissolving into the water. A greensand filter would deal with this. I live in one of the reputedly "bad" water supply areas in Canada, and for 350 days of the year I can't tell the difference between charcoal filtered water and the water straight from my tap. Every once in a while they have to pump in a bunch of extra chlorine (when water use is high and they have to draw from surface sources), so I keep one around for then. I used to do environmental testing at an industrial plant that discharged into a major river, and over three years there I never saw a single number that was anywhere close to dangerous. >>6862117 > ozonate Surface water is sometimes disinfected, but not always, and aquifer water doesn't need to be at all. Our water is pretty awesome in general, so there's rarely a need. We've got clean rivers and deep groundwater fucking everywhere.

11 hours later 6862937 Anonymous
>>6862909 You do if you live near it (mostly when camping). Glacier water is awesome. And cold. But don't eat the yellow snow.

11 hours later 6862938 Anonymous
>>6862322 Wait wtf they have costco in Canada?

11 hours later 6862942 Anonymous
>>6862938 nigga we gots dat target, walmart AND costco we're pretty much america jr

11 hours later 6862966 Anonymous (zoolander 2.jpg 275x190 17kB)
>>6862923 What is this, a processes for ants?

11 hours later 6862971 Anonymous
I have a well in a high iron, hard water, area and the water is disgusting. The shower is brown with rust and the water smells and tastes nasty. A PUR filter in my refrigerator helps immensely with drinking water (I also have a salt softener, but the shit in the water clogged it and hauling salt sucks anyway, so it's off)

14 hours later 6863071 Anonymous
>>6862094 >/sci/ is the second smartest >second smartest >has to come here to ask his question I don't know. Why don't you ask the first smartest board?

20 hours later 6863338 Anonymous
>>6863071 it's not really worth their time bro, priorities...

20 hours later 6863340 Anonymous
>>6862899 lol

20 hours later 6863348 Anonymous
>>6862155 >>6862777 So a redneck who can get a lot of practical shit done but is generally dumb pleb otherwise is "smarter" than a Nobel prize-winning scientist the implications of the research of whom aren't immediately obvious? Did the redneck make the scientist's tools possible, or rather the other way around?

20 hours later 6863351 Anonymous
Off-topic question: why do the stupid onahole ads appear on what is supposed to be a SFW-board, essentially making it NSFW?

21 hours later 6863383 Anonymous
>>6862094 Water filters don't work beyond calcium/etc You're looking for reverse osmosis systems

21 hours later 6863404 Anonymous
>>6863351 Use adblock you clown. I thought this was supposed to be the board with intelligent people? Anyway, 4chan is NSFW. Some boards are safer than others, but if it's an issue, you shouldn't be on here during work hours.

27 hours later 6864072 Anonymous
>>6862546 >/pol/ Yeah, nothing says smart like Christian tin foil hat wearing climate change deniers.

27 hours later 6864073 Anonymous
>>6862899 >70% of their images are unsourced >They still spam them anyway They are retards who think abortion causes an alive baby to come out.

28 hours later 6864090 Anonymous
>>6862139 You'd think it'd be /sci/, /tg/ or /g/ but it depends on how you define "smart". /b/ is definitely smart, in a way that there are so many people on /b/ that the statistical probability of someone knowing some obscure fact increases a lot. They're also smart in a lot of other unsavory ways. It really depends on what you think is smart. Hell, some people revere soccer players for their insights into the nature of existence.

28 hours later 6864144 Anonymous
>>6864090 >/tg/ lol

29 hours later 6864188 Anonymous
>>6864090 >/g/ Nope, obsessing over Linux and Python doesn't take intelligence. I know there are a lot of retards on /sci/, but it's still the smartest board.

29 hours later 6864223 Anonymous
Smartest board being /pol/? 75% of that board is filled with NEETs that have probably never seen a black man or spoken to someone of the opposite sex. It's probably /diy/, maybe /sci/ or /g/

30 hours later 6864344 Anonymous
>>6864223 and how would you know that? go on there and ask any questions and you'll get a truthful and correct answer. I double dare you.

31 hours later 6864396 Anonymous
>>6864344 >Truthful >Correct lel. Like all of their "Truthful" and "Correct" images that is completely unsourced? The fact that they are so certain that they are right is why they are so wrong. They never use logic or source check. They are the dumbest board by far.

31 hours later 6864410 Anonymous
>>6862094 American Geology student here. For my hydrology class we took tapwater from 15 local public locations and tested them. The conclusion? Perfectly safe, the only thing out of sorts was manganese and the only thing that effects is flavor.

31 hours later 6864428 Anonymous
>>6864410 what was the flouride reading like?

31 hours later 6864429 Anonymous (fucking guy.jpg 680x510 29kB)
>>6864396 They're well sourced. It's just that you refuse to believe what you read because you're a pleb due to decades of public school indoctrination and brainwashing.

31 hours later 6864435 Anonymous
>/pol/ >Smart I made a thread talking about climate change and they all said it was a jewish conspiracy. When I told them not all climate change is global warming they couldn't make a single argument.

31 hours later 6864442 Anonymous
>>6864429 >Well sourced Sure, like that picture of a Charles Darwin's opinion on black people which was completely made up and taken from another man, or the picture of an aborted kid which was actually from a loss.jpeg. Lets not also forget the fact that they defend christianity, don't believe in climate change, think blacks are another species and think Ron Paul makes sense.

31 hours later 6864458 Anonymous (1412004976573.jpg 459x344 28kB)
>>6864435 [citation needed] go ahead, it's archived (just like this board is archived) so find the thread in question so we can verify it. until you do, you're a liar and full of shit.

31 hours later 6864463 Anonymous
>>6864435 They're /sci/entifically handicapped. What makes it worse is that they actually think they're an elite fraction of the population which is "red pilled" enough to to surpass everyone else with their x-ray vision. If you try to push them in the slightest towards a path requiring critical thought they invariably fail. At first I thought it was just because most of them were just shills reading off scripts and flowcharts but pretty much everyone there is totally incapable of thinking outside the box. It's always the same old threads with the same old themese regurgitated week after week.

31 hours later 6864465 Anonymous
>>6864458 >Go find a month old thread to prove that /pol/ doesn't believe in climate change You go to that board, you should know as well as I do. Stop defending such a horrible board. Besides, the 3 most popular 4chan archives don't even archive /pol/.

31 hours later 6864468 Anonymous
>>6864458 Not that anon but it sounds believable to me. They can barely grasp elementary concepts in physics and geology there. How would you expect them to entertain any new theories besides the old one they can barely expound now?

31 hours later 6864473 Anonymous
>>6864465 >/pol/ is one person with one point of view lol

31 hours later 6864483 Anonymous
>>6864473 No, it's a group of idiots with similarly retarded points of view. For everyone with a sensible opinion on a subject there are 100 "Red pilled" retards that don't.

31 hours later 6864491 Anonymous
>>6864468 There's Phd physicists who shit on global warming daily, with tons of citations/measurements/theories. etc Lubos motl for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubo%C 5%A1_Motl /pol/ has a lot of people, yes you will find some Phd Scientists there who disagree with the established dogma.

31 hours later 6864502 Anonymous
>>6864491 >Climate change = global warming >Short term change disproves long term trends >Physicist >Not geologist or climatologist Good job proving how stupid you people are.

31 hours later 6864504 Anonymous
>>6864491 And there are "Biologists" who don't believe in evolution. Doesn't make them not fucking wrong and stupid.

31 hours later 6864505 Anonymous (TONY HELP ME.jpg 488x509 48kB)
>>6864502 >geologist, authority on anything other than rocks and minerals

31 hours later 6864507 Anonymous
>>6864505 >Climate has nothing to do with rocks and minerals Get out stupid.

31 hours later 6864515 Anonymous
>>6864507 >climate is reducible to rocks and minerals get out

31 hours later 6864518 Anonymous
>>6864515 You really know nothing if you don't understand how a geology isn't very climate related.

31 hours later 6864519 Anonymous
He's right a physicist is better equipped for Climate science, mainly because the math and physics are so complicated. the average phd geologist just won't have the tools necessary to even understand climate models.

31 hours later 6864522 Anonymous
>>6864515 >Never heard of soil research Jesus christ.

31 hours later 6864528 Anonymous
>>6864519 >math and science Then a chemist would make more sense. They deal with math and actually have to know about the field. A physicist may be able to understand the math but they wont know the subject matter.

31 hours later 6864529 Anonymous (Best Hitchens.jpg 268x279 22kB)
>>6864522 >soil fully explains climate dynamics

32 hours later 6864535 Anonymous
>>6864529 Nice strawman. Sorry /pol/ kid but there is more to climate change then global warming. Soil acidity and erosion for one. You would know this if you weren't from /pol/.

32 hours later 6864566 Anonymous
>>6864535 Geology is part of it, but not enough. Tell me when geologists learn Hausdorff dimensions and Monofractal functions to analyze air temperature signals? Never

32 hours later 6864568 Anonymous
>>6864566 >Air temperatures What does that have to do with soil erosion anon? There is more than one type of climate change and it isn't all global warming.

32 hours later 6864581 Anonymous
>>6864568 >climate change is soil erosion and soil erosion only

32 hours later 6864585 Anonymous
>>6864581 Again, nice strawman. I never said that. A geologist would be an expert on a type of climate change and is why I added it.

32 hours later 6864594 Anonymous
>>6864585 >soil is a type of climate

32 hours later 6864596 Anonymous
>>6864594 It contributes to climate change. Same as water acidity. What's next? Water isn't apart of climate?

32 hours later 6864605 Anonymous
>>6862764 >>6862587 >>6862795 >>6862848 >>6864223 >>6864463 >>6864435 >>6864468 .... so i have to drop a big one on you guys. First, /pol/ is a satirical board. Now, I know, " what do these madmen just go on the internet and post lies? What gives?' But yes, the board is satire. Satire is the board. The board, satire is. Second, when people talk about the 'jewish conspiracy' on something like climate change. They're talking about people spending 30,000$ more to buy an electric car, they'll charge with a coal plant, having no plan for the environmental impact the batteries make. Is the climate changing? Yeah. Is it our fault? Debatable but releasing toxic chemicals and greenhouse gasses can't be good. Are the current solutions and marketing around being 'green' viable or realistic? No they're mostly money traps, 'jewish conspiracies.' Third, what's with all this /pol/ hate? There are people on this board who think .9999999999999999... = 1. There are people on this board who think logic derives from some magical source of reality instead of just axioms. The other day someone asked if 0+0.00...1 was positive. Your board consistently confuses being conscious with consciousness as if they were the same thing. (someone literally once asked me the difference.) You probably can't even distinguish between racism and racialism.

32 hours later 6864611 Anonymous
>>6864605 >What's with the /sci/ hate They are idiots that go to other boards and ruin them with their stupidity. >B-but they were pretending to be retarded

32 hours later 6864618 Anonymous
>>6864605 Oh, so /pol/ isn't racist and doesn't hate jews. It was all a funny joke!

32 hours later 6864635 Anonymous
>>6862094 >/sci/ is the second smartest board so I ask you, what is the science behind Water Filters? Nothing, it is only for taste. >>6862129 >The Brita filters are perfect for you. They remove some bad tastes and will reduce the hardness of the water. I've been drinking filtered water for most of my life (Possible all of it, but before ~5 y,o its fuzzy), and I can tell you the brita filters (the ones that go above a jug) are really trash. They improve the taste very slightly. The best are the dual sediment+chemical filter, they improve the taste to level of having literally no taste. It is also pretty cheap to maintain, ~$30/year for a 5person household, probably a few hundred to set up.

32 hours later 6864639 Anonymous
>>6864618 you can hate jews without being racist. and you can be racist without hating jews.

32 hours later 6864642 Anonymous
>>6864639 >Hate jews >not racist Is this part of your /pol/ irony?

32 hours later 6864653 Anonymous
>>6864642 as long as their race is incidental to your hatred, then it's not racism.

33 hours later 6864673 Anonymous
>>6864611 >They are idiots that go to other boards and ruin them with their stupidity. Like when we saved /v/?

33 hours later 6864688 Anonymous
>>6862094 Personal filters are primarily activated carbon (finely divided carbon) or diatomaceous earth (silica). Polar molecules adsorb to the carbon (or silica) surface. Things likes Ca2+, K+, Cl-, etc. get removed from the water in this manner. Even some polar organics (organic amines, aldehydeS, etc) can be removed also.

33 hours later 6864700 Anonymous
>>6864611 One time a got in an argument with a dude who thought Russell's paradox disproved reality because reality was a set of everything. I called him retarded, he made a pun about me and naive set theory.

34 hours later 6864800 Anonymous
>>6864711 Well the "race realists" out there claim to believe that race is based on genetics, not skin color. So technically there could be many different races of white people, including a Jewish race.

35 hours later 6864824 Anonymous
>>6864800 there are sub-sub species, so yes.

35 hours later 6864834 Anonymous
>>6862094 Activated Charcoal ain't it?

35 hours later 6864850 Anonymous
>>6864825 just buy the goddamn filter

35 hours later 6864852 Anonymous (1402294036796.jpg 600x894 78kB)
>>6864605 Thank you for that post. Lengthy enough, quality explaining, and clear. pic not related

35 hours later 6864870 Anonymous
>123 / 17 / 58 / 1 fucking samefags

35 hours later 6864887 Anonymous
>>6864883 >To bad he does it for free and I can just do this >he does it for free are you being paid for shitposting? how much $$$?

36 hours later 6864933 Anonymous
>>6864918 >which to shit post. I'm not going to Every post from you so far has been a shitpost m8

36 hours later 6864950 Anonymous
>>6862094 But /diy/, /g/ and /lit/ are all smarter than /sci/.

36 hours later 6864953 Anonymous
>>6864945 >Seriously, I said /pol/ was satire >here are people on this board who think .9999999999999999... = 1 Nice cognitive dissonance :^)

38 hours later 6865020 Anonymous
>>6862821 Sounds wrong to be honest. How big a cross-section did your interface between the prongs and the metal have? I expect if you clamp it on proper you'll get something closer to maybe 1/100 of that: I couldn't get the stats for Chrome-Vanadium, but FerroChrome is 1E-6 Ohm*M resistance. Multiplying by the length of the wrench (20 cm) and dividing by the cross-section (2 cm * ½ cm) gets me 2mOhm And that's if you clamp on 20 cm apart, which isn't required. You can put those clamps closer together.

38 hours later 6865026 Anonymous
>>6864605 >Third, what's with all this /pol/ hate? I don't keep coming to /pol/ with "OK on Sci we have a political question" threads because we answer our own fucking questions. /pol/ keeps coming here with stupid questions nobody would ask if they hadn't already decided what answer they want to hear.

38 hours later 6865028 Anonymous
>>6864653 >as long as their race is incidental to your hatred, then it's not racism. If you hate Mike Broslowski, who happens to be Jewish, because he once punched you in the nose, that's not racist. But if you're hating "jews," the race is not incidental you dense retard.

39 hours later 6865075 Anonymous
When all's said and done, there is certainly surprising information to be gleaned from the board

41 hours later 6865177 Anonymous
>>6864429 /pol/tard detected

47 hours later 6865613 Anonymous
>>6864673 >Saved /v/ >With shitposting and off topic

47 hours later 6865617 Anonymous
>>6864605 >Every retarded thing /pol/ believes is ironic So you are telling me /pol/ doesn't not believe in climate change and there isn't a huge section of /pol/ who think america should have a king. Oh and all of those fedora spammers are just being ironic too right? We hate /pol/ because they shitpost with their stupidity on other boards.

1.642 0.159