4chan archive /sci/ (index)
2013-08-31 11:26 6001828 Anonymous Swedish Engineers Invent ‘Nano Gas’ That ‘Instantly Neutralizes’ Carbon Pollution (1365711479152.gif 300x200 1709kB)
http://planetsave.com/2013/08/26/sw edish-engineers-invent-nano-gas-tha t-instantly-neutralizes-carbon-poll ution/ So what do you think?

1 min later 6001834 Anonymous
>>6001828 I think that's fucking cool, but we'll have to wait and see how testing turns out.

3 min later 6001837 Anonymous
>>6001834 oh yeah, here's the "data", don't know how unbiased it is: http://revolution-green.com/2013/07 /29/hydro-nano-gas-or-hng-an-answer -to-greenhouse-gases/

5 min later 6001843 Anonymous
Great, now we'll go full retard with that solution and have it bite us in the ass in the future.

6 min later 6001846 Anonymous
>>6001843 Right? Right? We're totally fucking boned if this becomes common practice.

7 min later 6001849 Anonymous
I for one am looking forward to it killing all plant life on earth by starving them of CO2.

8 min later 6001851 Anonymous
lol the nano gas becomes the next pollution that's going to kill us

9 min later 6001855 Anonymous
>>6001849 >>6001851 Come on guys, these are not legitimate concerns.

17 min later 6001872 Anonymous
I can't think of anything that could possibly go wrong. Fund it

22 min later 6001882 Anonymous
Great! Let's do this! >A few years later: >Swedish Engineers Invent ‘Micro Gas’ That ‘Instantly Neutralizes’ Nano Gas Pollution

29 min later 6001898 Anonymous
>>6001828 It's grade A bullshit. WTF is a a nanogas? Why is it INCREASING nitrous oxide emissions? Why didn't they measure particulate emissions? Burning is already an incredibly efficient process. Their results are far from unbiased

29 min later 6001900 Anonymous
>>6001898 Also, not published in a peer reviewed journal.

37 min later 6001918 Anonymous
Lel, Sweden cannot into science.

52 min later 6001944 Anonymous
>hydrogen nano gas hydrogen is already smaller then the nano scale

55 min later 6001959 Anonymous
>>6001944 Holy shit, none of the hundreds/thousands of people who found out about this never realised what you just said. You're fucking amazing mate, did you finish highschool or something? In all seriousness though, hydrogen nano gas only implies it has a lot of hydrogen in its structure.

1 hours later 6002105 Anonymous
Come on, this is pretty significant shit right here, how come no one is interested?

2 hours later 6002118 Anonymous
>>6002105 Because its a blog, if it were published in some (respectable) journal then that would be different.

2 hours later 6002144 Anonymous
So are they talking about a very fine mist of water with minerals dissolved in it which absorb CO2 (such as olivine)? Might work.

2 hours later 6002160 Anonymous
>>6002144 Okay, I have visited the site, and it is nothing to do with carbon-absorbing minerals: http://www.hydroinfra.com/en/soluti ons/how-hng-works/ I haven't worked out all of the details, but it's some gimmick for improving combustion. What the test result PDF actually shows is a reduction of carbon MONoxide emissions. Some idiot marketer has taken that and gone around shouting that it eliminates carbon DIoxide emissions.

2 hours later 6002163 Anonymous
>>6002144 >>6002160 Stop talking out of your ass.

2 hours later 6002168 Anonymous
>>6002105 I'm not seeing anything of interest here... There's a blog that links what seems to be a news site as its source. Flat earthers are more credible than this.

2 hours later 6002177 Anonymous
>>6002163 Go fuck yourself. I went and actually read the "documentation": http://www.hydroinfra.com/en/wp-con tent/uploads/sites/2/2013/06/HIT-Ve rifReport-draft7-130710.pdf Read it. What they claim the tests show is that CO2 emission goes up, and CO emission goes down, when they inject their gas. It's a thing to make combustion more complete. Read this crazy shit (obviously written by some marketing twerp): http://www.hydroinfra.com/en/soluti ons/what-is-hng/ Whatever HNG really is, they're making it out of water. Maybe it is simply water, maybe it's a mixture of water and molecular hydrogen and oxygen. But whatever it is, it's not going to prevent carbon dioxide emissions.

2 hours later 6002181 Anonymous
>>6002177 >Maybe it is simply water, maybe it's a mixture of water and molecular hydrogen and oxygen. ...or maybe it's a plasma spray. That would get better combustion out of a shitty combustion chamber.

2 hours later 6002207 Anonymous
>>6001849 >>6001851 >>6001846 >>6001843 Hippies. Hippies everywhere

2 hours later 6002216 Anonymous
>>6002144 >>olivine Excellent, I've always wanted to put sand in my engine!

2 hours later 6002225 Anonymous
>>6002216 Well, when I was guessing it was something like that, I was under the impression that it was for stuff like coal furnaces.

3 hours later 6002234 Anonymous (science.fiction.in.a.nutshell.jpg 960x1299 625kB)
I think we must fear science. The only way we could possibly fight global warming is by shunning all technology. Change is bad. This gas is just us playing God.

26.071 0.065