4chan archive /r9k/ (index)
similar threads
2013-10-03 06:30 8957674 Anonymous (young_cowboy_by_earlwyant-d5yixg6.jpg 1024x1057 173kB)
Hey femanons, why don't you have a masculine, chivalrous, conservative boyfriend from the Southern U.S. who'll treat you raht? Do you enjoy not being treated like a lady or something?

1 min later 8957690 Anonymous (1_250.gif 250x100 137kB)
>Implying real southerners would settle with a filthy yankee

2 min later 8957702 Anonymous
now i'm imagining that black fembot awkwardly hitting on a secret kkk cowboy

2 min later 8957710 Anonymous
>>8957690 >not marrying and repeatedly impregnating a yankee girl so as to prevent more yankees from spawning and voting Democrat top lel

3 min later 8957716 saturno (panda why.png 634x471 406kB)
>>8957674 >from the Southern U.S >wanting an american boyfriend why

3 min later 8957721 Anonymous
Being treated like a lady makes me feel awkward. I don't feel like a lady, just like another human being, don't lie to me and try to pretend things are otherwise. I also live in Canada, so there's that. I could get a pretty masculine lumberjack type. At least they don't have that weird 'southern chivalry' thing going on, but I'm not into flannel.

4 min later 8957728 Anonymous (1370425917760.jpg 300x260 29kB)
>>8957710 >Implying it would be worth touching a filthy yankee

5 min later 8957742 Anonymous
>>8957716 Because Eurofag guys make like 25% less money on average.

7 min later 8957772 Anonymous
>>8957728 She would adapt to the superior southern way of life quickly enough. >2013 >not open carrying I mean, how can you NOT want to repudiate that?

8 min later 8957783 Anonymous (tumblr_mookld3MY31ro1r6eo1_500.jpg 500x375 43kB)
Alaskan master race reporting in. >south >conservative HUEHUEHUEHUE

9 min later 8957795 Anonymous
>>8957716 if you live in the US there's a good chance you'd want a BF who lives in the US also dipshit.

10 min later 8957801 saturno
>>8957795 every "femanon" lives in the Southern US

10 min later 8957802 Anonymous (1376237445828.png 460x479 293kB)
>>8957772 Enjoy your liberal gay children demanding hummus and fancy yankee coffees.

10 min later 8957806 Anonymous (oil stealing kike.jpg 320x238 36kB)
>>8957783 >having a jew in your only senate seat >conservative

11 min later 8957812 Anonymous
>>8957674 >Implying the first two could ever be used to describe a Reb Sherman was right motherfuckers. You fight the freedom bull, you get the liberty horns.

14 min later 8957836 Anonymous
No I don't want a gender role where I have to accept being less than my partner. Not wanting or being allowed to do the things he can do. Yeah I want people to see me as a women, no I don't want to be treated as second class in some "chivalrous" relationship, that conservative envision.

16 min later 8957852 Anonymous
>>8957812 Why don't you invade us again, effeminate factory boy? You can join your 300,000 brothers in Southern dirt.

16 min later 8957856 Anonymous
>>8957802 Wow you are way into your delusion bro

18 min later 8957875 Anonymous (1368436614408.jpg 490x490 48kB)
>>8957856 Go use your confederate flag as a cumrag, stinking southerner.

20 min later 8957898 Anonymous
>>8957836 It has nothing to do with being less than or a second class citizen, it's about a division of labor and complementing one another.

21 min later 8957904 Anonymous
>>8957674 But I do have one of those, OP. We go to the shooting range every weekend, ride horses at his mom's ranch and he just finished doing work on my new vehicle.

21 min later 8957909 Anonymous
>>8957875 ..whaat? the person you are responding to is critiquing the backwards conservative southern moron. Can you read?

24 min later 8957929 Anonymous
>>8957898 It's a division of labor created during the industrial revolution. It was sexist. but worked for that economy, but it doesn't even work for the current economy and is still blatantly sexist. And yes when a man is allowed much more freedom than a women and says it's chivalrous, it is still giving himself more rights on the back of women, for cowardly self absorbed reasons

24 min later 8957936 Anonymous
>>8957852 >effeminate factory boy Didn't realize sipping iced tea on the family plantation was considered masculine. Maybe you all should try working a day in your life. And I'll gladly invade you again, little Dixie bitch. After all, we can't expect you to do the same.

25 min later 8957947 Anonymous
>>8957929 If things are so much better for women now, why have female depression/stress rates skyrocketed since the 50s while male rates stayed the same? Women aren't meant to work, they all deep down hate being forced into the masculine sphere. They should stay at home with their babbies.

27 min later 8957964 Anonymous
>>8957936 How many of you yankee faggots even know how to shoot a gun? Fuck, how many of you can change a tire? Maybe you should save yourself the embarrassment and continue writing on your faggot blog.

30 min later 8957998 Anonymous
>>8957964 >How many of you yankee faggots even know how to shoot a gun? A great deal, somebody's gotta defend this country. We can't all pay somebody else to do it now can we? >Maybe you should save yourself the embarrassment and continue writing on your faggot blog. Maybe you should save yourself the embarrassment and stop trying to fight a war you already lost.

31 min later 8958006 Anonymous
>>8957998 >implying the army isn't disproportionately southern

32 min later 8958012 Anonymous
Most of those things sound good, but conservative implies creationist, and I am not willing to throw away four years of study that directly counters creationism. I mean if he's cool with dating an atheist, I'm cool with dating a Christian.

35 min later 8958032 Anonymous
>>8957964 >tfw not glorious southern master race >tfw my dad has taken me hunting every year since I was a kid >tfw we go target practicing at least once a month >tfw all of my friends are against owning firearms Why did you have to move to such a faggot state, mom and dad?

35 min later 8958038 Anonymous
>>8958012 >conservative implies creationist wut No it doesn't. If anything the people who accept evolution fully are the most conservative.

38 min later 8958055 Anonymous
>>8957947 If your rates about depression are true it makes far more sense to believe depression to form from a ridiculous patriarchal society than from a biological inept. Also I never said things were better. I do think things are better in 2013 than 1920, but I also think there is a metric ton of hidden and not so hidden sexism.

38 min later 8958062 Anonymous
>>8958038 >Moving the goalposts >>8958006 >Fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan >Defending the country

39 min later 8958068 Anonymous
>>8958038 How on earth do you figure that? To clarify, I am talking about the southern US male conservative that OP's talking about. I guess all I know about them though is stereotypes from people like Rick Perry.

39 min later 8958071 Anonymous (136970455856.gif 228x188 1877kB)
Southerners are filthy, sweaty, lazy, greasy, inbred cousin fuckers with fetal alcohol syndrome who think they'd actually stand a chance against the rest of the country.

41 min later 8958088 Anonymous
>>8958055 >If your rates about depression are true it makes far more sense to believe depression to form from a ridiculous patriarchal society than from a biological inept. wut rephrase this. >a metric ton of hidden and not so hidden sexism. No, the world is bent over backwards to promote womyn interests. Women are miserable because society expects them to act like men. Women are very different from men in almost every way. If there is any oppression going on against women, it is this.

41 min later 8958091 Anonymous
>>8958038 >If anything the people who accept evolution fully are the most conservative Wow. That is a crazy fabrication. No. All you have to do is look at politician and their stances. The only candidates to be so defensive and egotistical as to call evolution into question are conservative. seriously.

42 min later 8958101 Anonymous (1316746849440.png 247x302 97kB)
>>8958038 >If anything the people who accept evolution fully are the most conservative.

45 min later 8958121 Anonymous
>>8958068 Human biodiversity. Leftist social scientists regularly do everything in their power to ostracize and blacklist evolutionary biologists who point out that humans that evolved in tropical environments and humans that evolved in colder environments display different behaviors on average, as reflected by statistics on IQ, time preference, and tendency for aggression. Also there's the differences between men and women, which they want to say is all a SOSHUN CONSTRUKT. The people who consistently apply evolution to humans are pretty much all right wing. Charles Murray, Steve Sailer, Jared Taylor, and so on.

46 min later 8958127 Anonymous
>>8958091 >>8958101 No idiots, leftists regularly deny evolution as it applies to humans. They say race and gender are social constructs, when evidence points to substantive innate differences between genetic aggregates and the sexes in behavior.

47 min later 8958138 Anonymous
>>8958071 Them's fightan words partner. I'll see you in front of the saloon at high noon.

47 min later 8958146 Anonymous
>>8958121 >what is social darwinism? It's been disproven pretty well, you mongoloid.

49 min later 8958163 Anonymous
>>8958127 >here are a bunch of bullshit generalizations I made up to save myself

50 min later 8958176 Anonymous
>>8958146 No it hasn't, dingus. Stop listening to your women's studies professors. Steven Jay Gould and a bunch of other charlatans fabricated data just so they could push their degenerate egalitarian agenda. The evidence for innate racial differences in average behavior is extremely strong. The only reason you don't know this is that science is regularly censored by useless leftist "social scientists." Publishing the wrong data can end your career.

53 min later 8958208 PlατΩ ( ´∀`)
>>8958146 That's ableist. There's never been any proven IQ differential between mongoloids and neurotypicals, you bigot.

54 min later 8958215 Anonymous
>>8958176 Ah, yes, the old liberal conspiracy defense. Tell me, if the liberal scientists are smart enough to collude together and publish false data to trick the American public, why are you mad? Don't you trust their superior intellect to guide public policy? Don't punch above your weight class, champ. Get a PhD before you start pushing your baseless claims. At least Steven Jay Gould was peer reviewed and bothered to "falsify" his data.

59 min later 8958244 Anonymous
>>8958215 No, he demonstrably falsified his data. He claimed the skull measurements of Samuel George Morton were false, when they were perfectly correct. He was a lying charlatan, and anyone who takes him seriously is an imbecile. It's not actual scientists that are colluding and publishing false data. It's useless "social scientists" who for all intents and purposes censor the data by blacklisting anyone who publishes it. Social Science/Humanities departments are the modern equivalent to the medieval Catholic Church. They label someone a heretic/racist and destroy their career, preventing anyone from taking them seriously. All the evidence for human biodiversity is there plain as day if you look at it without concern for seeming "racist".

1 hours later 8958282 Anonymous
>>8958244 Are you fucking high? Samuel George Morton, as in the guy who claimed people with larger heads are actually more intelligent than people with smaller heads? Dude, you have to do better than 250 year old pseudoscience here. That's like quoting LaMarck as a reliable source of information.

1 hours later 8958316 Anonymous
>>8958282 There is a massive correlation between brain size and IQ, bigger than the correlation between muscle size and strength. >inb4 "muh IQ is not a good measure of intelligence" It is, it is literally one of the best predictors of success in life. And everything points to it being almost entirely heritable unless the difference in environment is gargantuan.

2 hours later 8959002 Anonymous (1376625435085.gif 580x433 1643kB)
>>8957836 >>8957929 >>8958055 >muh sexism >muh oppression

5 hours later 8959860 Anonymous
>>8958071 White southerners are the best American whites. Those that you described are the black and Hispanic population.

6 hours later 8959888 Anonymous
Would have too many hangups about an american bf, especially a southern one. He's probably into guns, hunting, really backwards progressively and just not what I want. Though I would like an old style gentleman with a nice accent who'd treat me like a lady. ;-;

6 hours later 8959892 Anonymous
>>8959888 >implying guns, hunting and being against "progressiveness" is bad Only in Sweden would a woman want to be raped by shitskins and scream about men standing to piss.

3.174 0.086