4chan archive /r9k/ (index)
similar threads
2013-03-10 10:33 6017357 Anonymous (1362714397425.jpg 960x665 162kB)
Is it true that women care more about personality than looks?

0 min later 6017362 Anonymous
lol no. god no. but they will say that to make themselves feel good.

0 min later 6017367 Anonymous
Women only care about money.

1 min later 6017369 Anonymous
For long-term partners, but not quick whoring sessions.

1 min later 6017373 eeyore
Not in the least, OP. Not in the least.

1 min later 6017374 Ambrose
It's true in their minds and that's all it takes to make it a fact in articles, news papers, magazines and general media outlets.

1 min later 6017380 Anonymous
Initially they care more about looks. After she weeds out the good looking ones then she goes for personality.

1 min later 6017381 Anonymous
Most of us do, yeah.

1 min later 6017383 Anonymous
>>6017367 Not money itself, but the potential it brings.

1 min later 6017384 Anonymous
I'd say that's pretty true.

2 min later 6017390 Anonymous (har.png 266x266 159kB)
>"There's a girl out there for everybody, Anon" >"It's what on the inside that counts"

2 min later 6017393 Anonymous
Is it true that all women have the exact same taste in sexual/romantic partners? Is it true that all men have the exact same taste in sexual/romantic partners?

2 min later 6017397 Anonymous
No, it's true that women care more about social status than looks.

2 min later 6017399 Anonymous
Women care about status. Now, if the way you choose to convey your status is your personality or your looks, it doesn't matter, what's important is that you have status at first place.

3 min later 6017411 Pachacutec
You have to look good enough to don't disgust her, you just have to pass that test. After that, yeah, personality comes into play.

3 min later 6017413 Anonymous
>>6017357 Why does this girl pretends she is innocent, putting flowers in her hair, if i know she has tasted cum on her face?

3 min later 6017414 Anonymous
>>6017374 >>6017373 >>6017397 know what's up.

4 min later 6017423 Anonymous
Yes. If you're 10/10 and socially awkward, you're not getting any girls ever because girls view socially awkward guys as less than human. If you're 1/10 and a confident alpha male, you will be able to attract any girl.

5 min later 6017440 Pachacutec
>>6017423 >If you're 1/10 and a confident alpha male, you will be able to attract any girl. Now now, don't be silly. Personality goes a long way but it isn't magical.

5 min later 6017444 Anonymous
>>6017413 Flowers are plant genitals. It's a subtle message.

6 min later 6017455 Anonymous
There is no such thing as people caring about one or the other far greater. Each is a part of attraction, and sometimes people with attractive personalities can be unattractive to you in other ways, and vice versa.

7 min later 6017476 Anonymous
>>6017413 Because she can be innocent and shit even if she's sucked a dick. I promise.

8 min later 6017491 Anonymous
it's mostly about status and confidence, if you believe you are a rockstar you will act like one and she will believe it but. The hard part if you'r ugly is to get under her skin, if you'r a awesome person with interests, passion and things to say chances are you can land a girl out of your league that enjoys that kind of thing, but first you have to get her interested and that's the hard part if you'r ugly/socially awkward. I thought I was ugly in my teens so I would slowly work myself in and get her to see who I am, then i realized that on top of being one charming motherfucking pig i'm also decent looking, or maybe i'm not, who care as long as you believe it and act on it, it's true.

9 min later 6017494 Anonymous
No. The truth is that women are just as shallow as men when it comes to what they look for. Women still judge extremely off looks. If you ever hang out with a group of girls they'll talk about how hot guys are all day. When women say they care more about personality it's always bullshit. It's not a bad thing they value looks, men do the same thing, it's just human nature. It's really not that shallow.

9 min later 6017501 Anonymous
>>6017476 >Girls can be innocent even if they're whoresluts who have been fucked by a billion alpha males in every orifice by the age of 16

10 min later 6017515 Anonymous
>>6017423 You are totally wrong. The chances of a 10/10 being socially awkward are so, so low because chances are they've had people approach and talk to them their entire lives. Even if he WAS awkward, he'd still easily be able to get with chicks.

10 min later 6017519 Anonymous
>>6017476 >innocence >she's sucked a dick Choose one. You can't have your cake and eat it.

10 min later 6017520 Anonymous
>>6017501 She can put on an act for you.

11 min later 6017523 Anonymous
Status + (money x dick) = personality. I call it female math.

11 min later 6017525 Anonymous
it kinda depends on what woman just like some dogs love cuddles best and some prefer turkey

11 min later 6017536 Anonymous
>>6017520 That makes her two times non-innocent. First, because she sucked dicks, and second, because she is a dissimulated whore who puts an act for others.

12 min later 6017539 Anonymous
In my experience, yes, for sure. I've been with several beautiful women -- in fact, I've really been with beautiful women exclusively -- where I myself am not wonderfully attractive. I'm sort of chubby (probably 20-25% bodyfat) and have a fairly average face (though I do dress well), and have never been really told that I'm physically attractive in any way by anyone. I've been able to make these girls love me or want to be with me based on me talking to them, how I make them feel, how I make them laugh, stuff like that. I see it often with other guys too - there's plenty of men out there with women who seem far more attractive than themselves. Much more rarely do I see men with women significantly less attractive than themselves. Of course there are probably myriad exceptions, but in my experience, it's how you make the girl feel, rather than how you look.

13 min later 6017555 Anonymous
>>6017491 simply believing you're a rockstar isn't enough, , you need to be acknowledged by other people as a rockstar. Then you an have any girl you want. see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9Ko 6Xfa84w and similar panks on youtube. Women are attracted to social status. This is what's most important to them. If they see everyone around you act like you're so cool, they'll think you're cool and will want you. That's the bottom line.

14 min later 6017574 Anonymous
POWER RANKING OF WHAT GIRLS CARE ABOUT 1. Popularity/social proof 2. Confidence 3. Money 4. Looks 5. Height, muscles, dick size, etc. 6. Other stuff (sense of humor, intelligence, kindness, etc.)

15 min later 6017594 Anonymous
Money/power > looks > confidence > personality. If I recall. Obviously men meeting multiple criteria are far more desirable.

16 min later 6017610 Anonymous
>>6017539 Also, I'd like to add, since many people are posting about it, OF COURSE women care a lot about looks. But that doesn't mean that, as far as perhaps some flings or especially a monogamous relationship goes, personality isn't a huge factor. And it's not like a guy stops thinking about or talking about or lusting for (albeit with the desire to not act upon his lust for) beautiful women when he's in a monogamous relationship. That's just silly. It doesn't mean, at least in my case, I'd ever cheat on someone that I loved for their personality and the entirety of their being (with looks obviously being a factor, albeit not the most important in my world) for someone more attractive.

16 min later 6017612 Anonymous
Yes. But that doesn't mean they care about a nice personality. They care about an interesting personality.

17 min later 6017642 Anonymous
>>6017574 yep. what else needs to be said?

18 min later 6017651 Anonymous
>>6017574 >>6017539 These guys have it right. Basically it doesn't matter if you're the most physically attractive guy on Earth, you're not getting anywhere with any woman unless they perceive you as socially successful and charismatic. Women are in fact much more shallow than men, even though men judge based more on looks and don't care at all about status. Because you can change your looks, you can lose weight, you can wear different clothes, you can get a different hairstyle, etc. and so even if a man views a woman as "ugly" at one stage in her life she can very quickly become beautiful if she just changes a few things about her appearance. But you can't change your core personality, and so women automatically shut out thousands upon thousands of men from ever having the chance to date them simply because they weren't raised with enough positive reinforcement to give them the self-esteem they need to be a confident alpha-male.

18 min later 6017658 Anonymous
Women want a fucking grunting caveman alpha who could beat the shit out of all other males.

19 min later 6017666 Anonymous
>>6017574 >Height, muscle and dick size in 5th place Tiny dicked skinny fat manlet detected It goes like this 1. Looks (height, muscle, dick size all fit into this category) 2. Money/power 3. Other stuff (confidence, personality, kindness, etc.)

22 min later 6017705 Anonymous
>>6017574 >>6017594 You guys are waaaay off. This isn't how attraction works. All of those factors are mixed around and each of them criteria and degrees of such that is attractive to them. Obviously, things that are more attractive in a person than not leads to more attraction. Looks are simply much easier to recognize as being attractive or not. Status is generally how successful you are, which is a good thing regardless of who you are.

25 min later 6017742 Anonymous
>>6017705 >Status is generally how successful you are, which is a good thing regardless of who you are. Not if you're an unsuccessful person, like me.

27 min later 6017759 Anonymous
Why is this thread making me so depressed?

28 min later 6017784 Anonymous
>>6017658 this. you're one of them aren't you, a woman they call you?

29 min later 6017791 Anonymous
>>6017759 If people making shit up and pretending to have unlocked the secrets behind attraction makes you depressed, then that makes sense.

29 min later 6017792 Anonymous
>>6017574 Eh. I feel this list only applies to high school/ early college bitches. Here's the ranking of what actual WOMEN care about- 1. Confidence 2. STABILITY (This includes money, along with your career, how well you keep yourself and home) 3. Looks (This is really only slightly about number 4) 4. Personality (Yes, women actually care about your personality) 5. Physical Fitness (Yes, dick size, muscles, how healthy you are.) I'd say that's the power ranking for women who have stopped being bitches. Inb4 all women are evil manipulative whore succubi, they really aren't. Some are, but hey, some guys are complete selfish assholes too. Source on this power ranking: My gf

30 min later 6017803 Anonymous
>>6017792 Whoops, I kept Confidence at number 1. Pretend confidence is number 5 and move everything else up one rank.

30 min later 6017806 Anonymous
>>6017367 This. Motherfucking women would love anything out of a man if in return they know they're financially secure with a guy.

31 min later 6017814 Anonymous
u need to have both. women are always looling for someone better so u better keep up with her faggot

31 min later 6017817 Anonymous
>>6017759 Because you beta bro. >Them feels

32 min later 6017826 Anonymous
>>6017759 Because it's a godless pandemonium of wrong opinions, generalizations (wrong ones), /r9k/ level pseudo intellect and internet rhetoric. Just for the record, women care about looks as much or more than men.

33 min later 6017837 Anonymous
>>6017759 Perhaps it's because you don't meet the requirements of this list: >>6017574

33 min later 6017845 Anonymous
>>6017792 You're right to some extent. Your list is the beta list, while mine is the alpha list. When women are looking for a beta to marry and have kids with, the criteria they use is closer to what you posted. When they're looking for alphas to have one-night stands or short relationships with, they follow the criteria more based on what I posted.

35 min later 6017871 Anonymous
>>6017845 While I wouldn't categorize one list as beta or alpha, I do agree. I'd say my list applies more to women looking for long-term relationships, and yours applies to women looking for a guy to fuck.

36 min later 6017883 Anonymous
>>6017357 In a way yes, but they like dominant, life affirming, masculine, and powerful personalities, not sensitive, caring and loving personalities. Nietzsche and Roissy are right Link related, this is what women actually want: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_N S0vAYGVk

36 min later 6017887 Anonymous (35.png 320x240 123kB)
Personality > looks, anon.

41 min later 6017958 Anonymous
It's laughable when guys actually believe the bullshit that women spout. Two guys can act exactly the same, and if one is hot and the other isn't, women will fawn for the former. I've seen really attractive guys that weren't that confident, who were more shy and quiet and women still really fall for them. Looks are always more important than vague terms like "confidence". And don't believe otherwise. Women are just lying to not seem shallow.

44 min later 6017996 Anonymous
>>6017958 in your eyes "some" = "all" You're inexperienced, ignorant, and a little slow, I conclude from your point.

45 min later 6018011 Anonymous
>>6017958 I really hate you "all women are shallow, callous whores" people. You're fucking retarded. I bet you love your mom and cried like a little bitch when your grandma died. Shut the fuck up you fucking retard.

47 min later 6018044 Anonymous
>>6017887 are you the dude with the hot latina gf? You are my hero

50 min later 6018080 Anonymous
>>6017523 >Money with make you grow multiple dicks made of money >This is what /r9k/ believes

50 min later 6018090 Anonymous
>>6017887 we're married anon. she's in the background but censored at her request. Buy hey anon, anything I can do, you can too.

51 min later 6018096 Anonymous
>>6018011 I never said women were shallow whores, I said they lie to not APPEAR that way. There is nothing wrong with placing importance on looks. I'm simply saying women lie because they don't want to seem like they place importance on looks.

51 min later 6018104 Anonymous
>>6018044 oops meant to quote >>6018044 >>6018044 sorry for the confusion anon

52 min later 6018112 Anonymous
Her eyes would be nice if they weren't so fucking dark. Just ruins them completely for me.

52 min later 6018113 Anonymous
>>6017367 That's total bullshit. Yeah they'll marry a guy with money but still be craving some hot guys on the side

53 min later 6018126 Anonymous
No, it's not true. Why do people believe otherwise?

54 min later 6018132 Anonymous
>>6017958 No shit they LIKE attractive guys. That doesn't mean it's the most important thing, or that they value it more than men. But confidence absolutely surpasses looks. Legitimate confidence though, not betas trying to fake it. When confidence comes with being charming, outgoing, and entertaining, it works perfectly.

55 min later 6018147 Anonymous
Yes, but don't make the mistake of thinking they care about 'personality' meaning a good, upstanding personality. It means money, social status, etc.

55 min later 6018151 Anonymous
>>6018132 not confidence, aggression.

56 min later 6018163 Anonymous
It's kinda like with men. Men can find a woman hot, but if she's really stupid or acts like an airheaded bimbo, it's a big turn off. Does that make sense? Looks are still huge, but when it comes to wanting to be around them for longer personality matters. But that's already really obvious. To act as if women don't care about looks that much is silly, though.

56 min later 6018167 Anonymous
Women are basically as shallow as men. A woman who marries a wealthy older/basically elderly man is no less shallow than he is.

57 min later 6018169 Anonymous
Women are hooked by looks, personality is what seals the deal.

57 min later 6018174 Anonymous
>>6018151 Assertiveness works best, but being aggressive does work

58 min later 6018190 Anonymous
When it comes to one-time things, women judge completely off looks, which makes sense. Like let's say your group of guy friends meets a group of girl friends. What happens (who hooks up with who) depends on looks.

59 min later 6018197 Anonymous
>>6018169 can't you say the same thing for men

1 hours later 6018211 BillBates
>>6017357 If 'personality' entails status, confidence and affluence, then yes. A handsome man is nice to look at, but if he has a shit-tier personality then he'll be no good as relationship and husband material. Girls want somebody who shows his paternal instincts. Not just the girls with the daddy issues either.

1 hours later 6018250 Anonymous
>>6017357 Yes and no. Women care about status. You can be skinnyfat, you can be /fit as fuck, doesn't really matter. As long as you have an aura of confidence/charisma, they will come to you with little to no effort.

1 hours later 6018303 Anonymous (IMG064.jpg 1944x2592 964kB)
>>6017887 oh and here is a pic I took this morning

1 hours later 6018318 Anonymous
>>6018211 >Girls want somebody who shows his paternal instincts. i have a hard time believing this.

1 hours later 6018336 eeyore
>>6018197 >tfw hooked by personality and looks are just a bonus

1 hours later 6018340 Anonymous
I think, as a whole, women care less about looks than men do, but it's still important.

1 hours later 6018374 BillBates
>>6018318 I'm being serious. A handsome guy is desirable if a woman is looking for a quick fuck, but for a partner evolution has designed her to look for certain 'fatherly' traits.

1 hours later 6018404 Anonymous
>>6018340 It goes like this for men: >I'm ugly as fuck, look like shit and I'm boring. No girl would ever want me. For women: >I'm intelligent, have a great personality, dress nicely, why do men don't come to me?

1 hours later 6018447 Anonymous
>friends with this girl who you never saw as a whore >Seems like a classy broad >One day shows me this picture of some guy she knew from highscool on instagram with his top off posing in the mirror and tells me how horrible it is >She says "The only thing attractive about him is his money" >tfw

1 hours later 6018452 Anonymous
>>6018113 Women are human (according to scientists, who also say that blacks are people), and thus have both financial and sexual needs. Some just go the route of snag one poor, rich sap to pay for all of her shit, and then uses the bed he provides her to fulfill her sexual needs as well. Note that all women DO NOT do this. Also note that all of them DO wish they could. All women are whores. (Note to any women reading this: Don't try to tell me you're not a whore. If you're here, there's something wrong with you and feigning anger at being called out on what you are by nature is degrading to the both of us.)

1 hours later 6018477 Anonymous
>>6018374 So basically she'll be with you for financial support and emotional support without actually loving while she fucks handsome guys on the side right? I'd rather be celibate all my life than be a cuckolded bitch.

1 hours later 6018493 Anonymous
>>6018452 >Women are human pff, actually believin- wait >who also say that blacks are people I like you anon, you predict my thought pattern very well.

1 hours later 6018494 Anonymous
Does everyone on this board have severe emotional issues or is it just the vocal majority? >>6018447 How is having money not an attractive trait?

1 hours later 6018507 Anonymous (1342762325377.gif 226x148 2090kB)
>>6018477 And now you understand out plight.

1 hours later 6018511 Anonymous
>>6018447 So women aren't supposed to find wealth attractive at all? Even I think being rich makes a girl more attractive as long as she doesn't have kardashian attitude.

1 hours later 6018515 Pachacutec
>>6018169 Yup. If you're ugly, you just gotta work a lil bit harder to impress them, that's all.

1 hours later 6018519 Anonymous
>>6018494 It isn't what I look for in a girl. Just admit you are a prostitute with a middle man.

1 hours later 6018536 Anonymous
>>6018477 You're misunderstanding something. It's rich and beta guys who end up cuckolded, the rich and alpha guys are the ones who have loyal wives. If you are a bitch then you attract bitches willing to use you. Simple as that.

1 hours later 6018545 Anonymous
>>6018519 I'm not a chick, but in this >>6018447 post you basically said that any woman that finds money attractive is a whore

1 hours later 6018560 Anonymous
>>6018545 Well done you can read. That is exactly what I said.

1 hours later 6018581 Anonymous
>>6018560 Then it's clear you have no idea what a prostitute is.

1 hours later 6018594 Anonymous
>>6018545 Not that guy, but I think there's a difference between stability and wealth. Stability is a good thing to look for for both men and women. Stability meaning the ability, financial and otherwise, to take care of the other person and of yourself. Then there's wealth, which is having a lot of money and being able to spend lavishly. If you look for someone who's stable, then that's fine. But if you're with someone because they're wealthy, then man or woman you are a whore. If this idea offends you then get over it. >inb4 b-but he's got a great personality >inb4 b-but I'm wouldn't date someone just for their money

1 hours later 6018596 BillBates
>>6018477 Well this is drawn on the assumption that all women are inherently disloyal in relationships, which does not hold in reality (to many robots' disbelief.) There's no saying whether she'll fall in love with you as long as you provide financial/emotional support in a relationship, 'falling in love' is where it all falls down to personality/temperment and common interests/views. Some girls would take advantage of the support you provide for them, and others will appreciate it and stay loyal in a relationship.

1 hours later 6018606 Anonymous
>tfw I'm an ugly, poor guy with a qt gf I should not exist.

1 hours later 6018616 Anonymous
>>6018452 >If you're here, there's something wrong with you Really? Define "wrong". Tell me what is wrong with me. You say all women are whores. Then you say if they are not a whore, something is "wrong" with them. You start off by saying that being a whore is wrong, but to not be a whore is also wrong. Which one is it? All women do not desire to trade sex for money just as all men do not desire to trade money for sex. Both would rather be able to live in abundance of both that is unrelated to their supply of either. The real world does not work this way, so people resort to what they must to satisfy themselves.

1 hours later 6018625 Anonymous
>>6018596 Why is it a matter of "some" and "others". I'm not gonna be the one to say that all women are disloyal (or would be if they had the opportunity), but even someone like you has to admit that the number is startlingly high, much, much higher than it should be. ..and before you go off saying that I hate women, I think the same standard should be applied to men, and I'm ashamed of my own gender for contributing to this trend.

1 hours later 6018630 Anonymous
>>6018616 You are presuming that he was saying if you are here then you are not a whore, when in fact he was basically saying the exact opposite.

1 hours later 6018635 Anonymous
>>6018594 >But if you're with someone because they're wealthy, then man or woman you are a whore. Lol...so it's only whoredom if you want 'more' than stability. This is an arbitrary line you have drawn. It's not whoredom if you want to be able to go for a swim when you want, but it's whoredom if you want to own the pool.

1 hours later 6018650 Anonymous
>>6018630 >You are presuming that he was saying if you are here then you are not a whore Then what is the significance of >If you're here, there's something wrong with you ?

1 hours later 6018659 Anonymous
Women want a socially powerful man who has lots of money, looks nice, and is very dominant-assertive. Think of it this way; women want a replacement father.

1 hours later 6018662 Anonymous
Yes it's true. But a good personality is being confident, funny, strong, dominant, entertaining. Not having 4chan humor, great culture in obscure domains, being shy.

1 hours later 6018663 Anonymous
>>6018650 it's a post tailored to ignite maximum butthurt rather than an actual argument

1 hours later 6018674 Anonymous
>>6018635 >but it's whoredom if you want to own the pool. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? I don't see any difference between those two situations. It's still whoredom if you're with someone because of their wealth.

1 hours later 6018704 Anonymous
>>6018674 >It's still whoredom if you're with someone because of their wealth. Wealth is part of stability unless we're talking about being consistently poor or homeless.

1 hours later 6018711 BillBates
>>6018625 I agree. It's easier to be disloyal than to be loyal, so the numbers of disloyal women/men will be greater than the numbers of their loyal counterparts. Loyalty requires self-control, it's up for debate as to which gender may 'have more of it'.

1 hours later 6018719 Anonymous
>>6018616 I never said that if they are not a whore something is wrong. All women are whores. By wrong I meant you're psyche is damaged in some way, as normal, undamaged human being do not stay on r9k for long. And there's a difference between not wanting to do something and not acting on the urge. All women desire power over men. Some more than others, just like in everything. All women like to feel dirty. Some more than others. There are certain things all men want, in the same fashion. For instance, all men want to breed with as many young, fertile women as possible. >>6018674 Just to clarify this to everyone: It is whoredom if money is the primary reason for the woman to be in the relationship. If there are other factors, and money is simply a bonus, it is a lucky woman, but not a whore. Here's a simple test: Would you leave your man for a better looking man with the same amount of money? If yes, you're a whore. If no, you're a whore, but that isn't why.

1 hours later 6018724 Anonymous
>>6018659 >Think of it this way; women want a replacement father. This is really accurate based on my personal experiences.

1 hours later 6018750 Anonymous
>>6018674 >Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? 1. meat and leather when the cow passes away 2. breed the cow 3. chance the cow's diet and other things

1 hours later 6018764 Anonymous
>>6018719 >It is whoredom if money is the primary reason for the woman to be in the relationship That was exactly what I was saying. The major problem with saying that though is that women will make up other reasons that they stay with someone in order to justify it to themselves so they won't be seen/see themselves as a whore. >>6018750 It was a turn of phrase, autist.

1 hours later 6018781 Anonymous
>>6018659 I must agree with this. Father figure is the first image of a man they acquire. If her father appears weak, far too emotional (in relations/comparison with her mother), she will often start pursuing "assholes", since they have that incredibly appealing (for her) strength she didn't know before. Another face of that is when she sees her own father as a perfect man and thus develops feelings for him. Such girls deeply desire their fathers and at some point make advances. Obviously, they are refused most of the time and they forever seek someone like him. Sometimes, they are not refused... you can guess what happens.

1 hours later 6018798 Anonymous
Women are able to look past appearances, yes, but not for such noble reasons. Women like strong, aggressive personalities. Kind actions may only be presented sparingly and with the appearance of indifference. You must always present yourself as in charge. Women respect a man that does not weaken when they challenge him. Money is the main thing they look for. A partner with money can keep them safe, provide families for them, keep them from having to work, allow them to be full time mothers and to be extremely spoiled. Women thrive on status.

1 hours later 6018807 Anonymous
>>6018711 I'm definitely with you on that, I just always wish that this wasn't the case. That I could count on loyalty. Maybe someday people will start instilling good moral values into kids once again.

1 hours later 6018861 Anonymous
>>6018719 >By wrong I meant you're psyche is damaged in some way Define "damaged". Normal, undamaged women are having sex premarital sex regularly. Normal, undamaged women are waiting until their late 20s and early 30s to have children. These are women who are normal and undamaged by clinical standards. Trying to tell me what the healthiest state of mind is will be a dangerous game. >normal, undamaged human being do not stay on r9k for long Should I take this at face-value? Please demonstrate how you've come to this conclusion. >And there's a difference between not wanting to do something and not acting on the urge. >Also note that all of them DO wish they could. See >All women do not desire to trade sex for money just as all men do not desire to trade money for sex. Both would rather be able to live in abundance of both that is unrelated to their supply of either. I will edit my statement to the majority of women* and the majority of men* because the rest of the statement stands. >If there are other factors, and money is simply a bonus, it is a lucky woman, but not a whore. But you said >All women are whores. ?

1 hours later 6018875 Anonymous
>>6018764 >It was a turn of phrase i realize, but what you are trying to prove with the analogy is just as shaky

1 hours later 6018886 Anonymous (1362599920568.jpg 330x253 22kB)
Yes and No OP The main thing woman want in a man is a certain personality that they love, but at the same time they are vain and shallow as fuck so they want someone who is incredibly good looking. It takes most woman years upon years to realize that guys that are attractive usually are horrible people(they figure this out most of the time after the heaps of good looking guys they have dated had shitty personalities and whatnot) The female gender wants a man that is an amazing person but also incredibly hot, they have near impossible standards and are not willing to bend for them. They believe that jsut because they have a vagina means they can get the best of both worlds and won't stop until they find sed person. This is why woman go through so many men because they are looking for something that is incredibly rare and most don't find it because they are vain as fuck looking for someone who hates vanity. >inb4 I get slammed by butthurt fembots who think they are an exception to this type of woman Yes msot woman are like this but there are those who aren't(and most of them are ugly) They are a personable person someone like myself would look for in a relationship because they haven't been coddled and told how beautiful they are all their lives so they don't have massive egos and lack vanity. >If you are not a vain person think of yourself lucky

1 hours later 6018950 Anonymous
>>6018861 All those women you talked about generally have never heard of r9k. Yes. You should take it at face value. How many complete normalfags do you see on r9k? Everyone here is a little screwy No. All women desire to trade sex for money. Some women less than others. But the urge is always there. It's an evolutionary thing. I don't begrudge women the urge, I begrudge them the act. You seem to think I hate all women because I say that all women are whores. This is not so. To quote Paarthurnax, "What is better - to be born good, or to overcome your evil nature through great effort?" women who manage to keep themselves from being whores deserve respect and I give it to them. as far as >If there are other factors, and money is simply a bonus, it is a lucky woman, but not a whore. goes, see the rest of that sentence for an explanation.

1 hours later 6018960 Anonymous
>>6018861 His post is the epitome of r9k idiocy. Shame on you for trying to reason.

2 hours later 6019117 Anonymous
>>6018960 How so? I mean, the part about everyone on r9k being damaged is more or less a joke, but let's be honest here. How many people come here and aren't NEETs, Sperglords, foreveralones, betas or some form of autistic? We need a place on the internet to be ourselves, and this is just as good a place as any.

2 hours later 6019152 Anonymous
>>6018950 >Everyone here is a little screwy When the common form of sanity is in its current state, being screwy can be an improvement depending on which direction it takes. >All women desire to trade sex for money. They don't. You insist upon it, but you never explain. I have explained why they do not >Not all women desire to trade sex for money just as all not all men desire to trade money for sex. Both would rather be able to live in abundance of both that is unrelated to their supply of either. and you fail to even address that explanation. >But the urge is always there. There is no urge. There is only the realization of a last resort. Do you really think most prostitutes felt urged to go through with their first bout of whoring? It is not like hunger or any other biological drive. It is the realization that you have no better alternative. >You seem to think I hate all women No, I think that you are an idiot who does not understand what people ultimately want. Important question: does this have anything to do with a video about Capuchin monkeys?

2 hours later 6019155 Anonymous (sdf2342dsf.jpg 700x875 232kB)
being tall and good looking will help get girls interested at first, but it wont seal the deal take me for example. im 6'2", apparently good looking (ive very often received compliments/praise about my looks from non-relatives, and lots of desirable girls have approached me and flirted with me, etc), i also put some effort into my appearance and have a good hygiene. hell im also not shy and have a sense of humor. however, since im not "alpha as fuck", almost underweight, lack status, was diagnosed with ass burgers when i was very young, never played sports, not even into watching them, "hobbies" involve being in my bedroom (vidya, internet, computer shit, etc), am the type of person who would discover 4chan in early 2005, did shitty in school, dropped out of high school, live at home, NEET and leech off of social security, they always changed their minds before a relationship, sex or a kiss happened. now im a 26 year old kissless virgin. if i lowered my standards and went after hambeasts and ugly girls then they would probably go through with it, but since undesirable girls have shitty self esteem issues they like to nitpick flaws even out of desirable guys to make themselves feel better about themselves when youre tall and good looking, girls will have REALLY high expectations for you and make assumptions about you, so if youre like me or even just slightly better, they will extremely disappoint themselves

2 hours later 6019195 Anonymous
>>6017413 She is not pretending to be "innocent". There is a very big chance that she has not had cum in her face, and even if she has that wouldn't make her a slut or a whore

2 hours later 6019227 Anonymous
>>6019195 >any woman after 25 >nhot having cum on face

2 hours later 6019229 Anonymous
>>6017501 turning >a dick into >whoresluts who have been fucked by a billion alpha males in every orifice by the age of 16 retard logic

2 hours later 6019237 Anonymous
>>6019227 that girl isn't older than 25

2 hours later 6019259 Anonymous
>>6019237 I mean younger than

2 hours later 6019263 Anonymous
Um, the answer is obviously no. Why do you think they call ugly guys creepy but attractive ones not, even if they do the exact same thing

2 hours later 6019265 Anonymous
Good looks is everything when you want a girl, as that's the first impression. Good looks leads to good personality because an attractive guy is always confident Confidence = good in job interviews = financially secure Therefore, I'm sorry to say this but good looks is the de facto.

2 hours later 6019330 Anonymous
>>6018080 I think it should be revised like this Personality (Status + [money(dick + looks)]) = attraction

2 hours later 6019493 Anonymous
>>6019152 All I was saying about "normality" is that the people here aren't. I never implied it was bad or good. Who said all men desire to trade money for sex? No man WANTS to have to trade money for sex. There's a reason it's the BEST alternative for some women. There are a lot of women who would rather be sex workers than get a minimum wage job or two. You seem to think that most prostitutes are down on their luck and have nowhere else to go and nothing else they could possibly do. I would wager that very few whores are unhappy with their career, and the majority of those are probably in the slummiest parts of the slums, and actually do have to whore to eat. Perhaps urge is the wrong word. But, let me explain what I mean. Let's say there is a picture of you in some state of undress, perhaps in a two-piece bathing suit. Now let's say that this picture were posted on an anonymous imageboard that you frequent (like, say, r9k), by someone other than yourself. Now imagine someone posting something along the lines of "I would [drag my balls through a mile of broken glass just to watch her undress on a B&W t.v. with shitty reception]/[give my left nut to fuck her]/[pay a lot of money to sleep with her]. Would you not, even for the briefest of moments, feel better about yourself because there are men who would pay to fuck you? Do you not wish you had men lining up around the block to pay you large sums of money for a night with you, even if only in your deepest, darkest, most guilty fantasies? For men it isn't "I wish I could pay money to fuck such and such girl." That isn't the desire. The desire for men is to NOT have to pay for sex with you. As a man, I can say that if I were in a position to financially, I would be more than happy to support my wife/girlfriend completely, but not if she is only with me because I do so. It's a give and take for both sides, not a "the man gives and the woman takes". cont.

2 hours later 6019709 Anonymous
probably depends a lot on age. actually, no. Even old grandma is going to say "oh Sidney, are you going out in that outfit? Put some nice corduroy pants on and at least comb your hair..."

2 hours later 6019733 Anonymous
>>6019493 As a man (not much of one at the moment, but a man nonetheless), I would be more than happy to completely support a woman who loves me for whatever redeeming qualities she's managed to hallucinate. Would I be happier, even in the most minute way, if that same girl were financially independent of me? Of course I would. Even still, would I always be wary of her finding someone better? Of course. I can understand the urge to attach yourself to the most powerful male you can get your paws on. Like I said, it's evolutionary. Does that mean I'd just accept it or be fine with it if I caught her schmoozing up to someone else, or god forbid already in the process of leaving me? Definitely not. Also, this discussion was started on the back of a 90% joking statement I made off hand. Or do you think I'm actually a horrible misogynist and racist?

2 hours later 6019739 Anonymous
>>6019493 >Who said all men desire to trade money for sex? I never said they did. I stated that they don't want to. >No man WANTS to have to trade money for sex. There is a small number of men that fetishize the act, so they do want to, but they're not most men. >You seem to think that most prostitutes are down on their luck and have nowhere else to go and nothing else they could possibly do I'm not under the delusion that most prostitutes are high-end. >I would wager that very few whores are unhappy with their career That's a risky wager. >Would you not, even for the briefest of moments, feel better about yourself because there are men who would pay to fuck you? This doesn't indicate a desire to engage in prostitution. Men and women alike would usually be flattered to know that someone would pay a large sum to have sex with them, but it doesn't mean they would do it. It's the thought that someone has judged them to be of that worth that they are flattered by even if it is crude.

2 hours later 6019755 Anonymous
>>6017357 If woman didn't care about looks, then why would they skip dating an ugly guy? Check mate.

2 hours later 6019767 Anonymous
This just in: Different girls have different varying degrees of wanting different things in a male

3 hours later 6020167 Anonymous
>>6019739 You're right, I'm just full of shit for the most part. I was kidding in the beginning. Not all women are whores, and everyone knows that at some level. Do I trust women? I'd be a fool to. Would I trust a specific woman? To a point. There's a saying that I'm not sure of the origin of: "Forgive, never forget." I forgive women as a whole for the horror stories that I've heard, but I'll always be wary of it happening to me. Not paranoid, mind, just mindful of the possibility. Like I said, I'd be ecstatic to support a woman who genuinely loved me and our potential children. Not only because I'd have a woman who loves me, but because I'd be financially independent, which is always good to be. The other point I made in my first post is that it's stupid and at some level even a little bit mean for people who are able to function in society and have relationships to come to a place renowned for it's socially awkward, foreveralone inhabitants, and then rail on them for complaining about having no gf. I may be the only one who can tell I made it, but I've made it again here for those who aren't me. If you come to r9k and don't like the "all women are bitches and whores" threads, don't read them or don't come here.

7 hours later 6023728 Anonymous
>>6017413 dude, I'm a guy, and I put flowers in my hair. flowers are fucking awesome. don't judge people. If you do I will break an overripe banana and throw it at your face. Would you eat an apple, if you knew that I had ejaculated on the bee that had pollinated the flower that had grown into the apple?

7 hours later 6023937 Anonymous
what about a man who doesn't have much money, but is able to cut down trees and build his own goddamn log cabin? ALSO DON'T FORGET: the expectations can change based on culture. obviously money is simply a social construct. Personality is not really a social construct - conflicting personalities can cause strife in a relationship. look, there are countries in which the people have lost their faith in things like money because historical inflation has devalued the currency to be useless, leading to a culture that values other things, like the ability to work hard, obedience to family values, and intelligence. Just because American woman have tended to lose this (you can blame out television and our media etc.) doesn't mean that there aren't women who actually do have real values, and a pride in themself. Status is always going to be important; but how status is defined can change. Looks will always be good, but what is considered desireable changes as well. srsly guys. like, I've found it strange, that most of the females that have found me attractive turned out to have a similar ancestry, and I would guess that this might be for a reason. just look at this webpage: http://hungarianbeauty.com/why-marr y-a-hungarian-woman/ I mean, really guys? you are so dumb

3.706 0.278