4chan archive /r9k/ (index)
similar threads
2013-01-14 05:34 5231385 Anonymous (u wot mate.png 318x290 89kB)
So, I just told somebody that I don't like sluts, and that I don't like the idea of people being "fuckbuddies". That's all. And I got treated to a barrage of "UGH STOP CAUSING DRAMA", multiple links to something called "slut shaming" (like that's a negative thing?), all her cohorts telling me to "grow up" and such... Am I really that alone in disliking slutty people? Is that unreasonable of me? I shouldn't think so, especially considering I've hung with you guys a while. So basically, I guess, what are your opinions on "sluts" and "slut-shaming"? I've never received backlash for this before.

3 min later 5231415 Anonymous
Welcome to 2013. It sucks. You're not allowed to shame a whore for being a whore, because that isn't accepting that your 'adult responsibility' is to care for her after she's been pumped and dumped for 15 years. That's why they tell you to 'grow up'.

3 min later 5231419 Anonymous
You insulted a slut, that's all.

4 min later 5231426 Anonymous (MY POST IS A FAILURE.png 360x388 112kB)
Blast. My thread is a failure.

4 min later 5231428 Anonymous
>Saying what you really feel to normalfag women Dude. You don't do that shit. I don't care one way or the other on female promiscuity, but I know enough not to be honest with people.

4 min later 5231437 Anonymous
Slut-shaming is based on the idea that being a slut is some kind of value judgement. Like being a slut automatically makes someone some kind of sex hitler. c I don't care if a girl is a slut, as long as shes honest about it. To me thats more important than anything.

5 min later 5231439 Anonymous
>>5231426 3 posts in like 5 minutes ain't bad, son. Patience is needed outside of /b/.

6 min later 5231449 Anonymous
Being fat is bad, but you can't call girls out on it without taking shit. Same goes for being a slut.

6 min later 5231450 Anonymous
Last night, at a party, this girl showed me a picture. It had 5 guys on it. She then said she fucked all 5 of the guys. I was just like, okay do you want a fucking whore medal?

6 min later 5231457 Anonymous
>>5231428 this people tend to get butthurt easily in real life, best to keep opinions to yourself unless asked or drinking

6 min later 5231458 Anonymous (goodnews.png 303x296 106kB)
Well, I spoke far too soon! I figured I failed because it slipped off the front page, but I'm happy it didn't! >>5231415 Someone said "If a MAN posts his tits on the internet, nobody cares, so why should it be a problem if she does?" That seems a little silly a thing to say to me, considering breasts aren't sexual organs for males. Now, if a guy posted his dick for all to see...

7 min later 5231460 Anonymous
>>5231415 >You're not allowed to shame a whore for being a whore Because what does a girl sucking 50 dicks have to do with you and your life?

8 min later 5231469 Anonymous
>>5231460 Am I not allowed to say that I don't approve of it? Because it seems not.

8 min later 5231473 Anonymous
Because why is what someone does with their body any of your business?

8 min later 5231477 Anonymous
If you could get sex would you? Why does it make a woman a whore if she thinks the same way? I'm not a woman by the way. I'm also not a child and I realize that people other than myself have urges as well.

8 min later 5231481 Anonymous
on a scale of 1 to 10, how religious are you, OP? I'm guessing an 11.

9 min later 5231492 Anonymous
>>5231460 >Whore detected See >>5231449 .

10 min later 5231503 Anonymous
>>5231469 Who are you? >>5231492 Nope. Totally got a dick bro.

11 min later 5231511 Anonymous
I'd be a total whore if I were a woman. Then, when I was bored with just having sex with boys I thought were cute, I would find just one I could fall in love with. Until the day I died, I would tell him, "I've had sex with two other guys and neither of them were as good as you are." It would likely be a lie. But there's a lot more to a relationship than sex, and even if he was terrible at sex I would enjoy his enjoyment and help him improve to pleasure me one way or another. And I would watch porn and buy a vibrator. Then we'd have kids and life would be bliss. Fuck being a male.

12 min later 5231515 Anonymous (incoming stupidity.jpg 300x285 18kB)
Ah, my first negative posts. Maybe if I answer logically and rationally, nobody has to get upset. >>5231473 Directly nothing, but I have a mental illness that requires my to be honest and speak my mind. It troubles me often. >>5231477 Only if I was in a relationship with a woman and loved her. That's my point. >>5231481 Agnostic is 5, right?

12 min later 5231516 Anonymous
>>5231460 A lot, actually. Or have you been willfully blind to the fundamental changes in society over the last 50 years? Individual decisions that seemingly have no effect, in aggregate, have brought about the end of entire civilizations. Again I say, it's sad that with the sheer amount of information available on the internet, so few people know how to connect and interpret the data.

13 min later 5231537 Anonymous
>>5231477 >If you could get sex would you? Not with a different partner every weekend. Not OP, by the way.

13 min later 5231539 Anonymous
Why do you care whether or not someone is a slut?

16 min later 5231565 Anonymous
>>5231515 >Agnostic is 5, right? you're not religious? then why the fuck do you care about promiscuity? casual sex with random people feels great. the only reason people oppose it is because they're afraid of going to hell. if you're not worried about that, why would you deprive yourself of something that feels great? i mean, come on, use some common sense

16 min later 5231570 Anonymous
>>5231511 I probably would be a whore, too. Sounds like quite a life. If you're an attractive girl, sex is as easy as asking.

16 min later 5231572 Anonymous
>>5231503 This, pretty much. Who are you to approve of something someone does that's none of your business? I don't get the concept of "approving" of it or not. There's nothing to approve. How would you feel if I told you I don't approve of people who eat apples? It's pretty silly, isn't it? You're entitled to your opinion of not liking the idea of being fuckbuddies, sure, but "slut" is an awful term used by people to shame girls who aren't having sex with -them-. If you don't want people getting snappy, try not insulting them.

18 min later 5231607 eeyore
>>5231477 >you would do the same based off of this assumption that you don't even follow!

19 min later 5231617 Anonymous
>>5231539 Why do sluts care whether or not someone doesn't like them?

20 min later 5231625 Anonymous
>>5231385 I dislike those who sleep with many people if they have an STD or if they're a douchebag

20 min later 5231626 eeyore
Also it becomes an issue when whores say there's NOTHING wrong with lots of partners, then deny the legions of articles and graphs which prove direct negative consequences.

20 min later 5231633 Anonymous
>>5231565 >only religious people have morals Upstanding argument. I'm not religious, guess I should be okay with people stealing then. It must feel great, and they get shit for free. The only reason people oppose it is because they're afraid of going to hell.

20 min later 5231634 Anonymous
>>5231565 A slut is far more likely to be a hedonistic cheater. >>5231572 But eating apples says nothing of one's character.

21 min later 5231639 Anonymous
>>5231385 You're not alone. I don't mind sexually liberated women. It's a hard term to throw around because it's so muddied, but - a woman who feels free to have sex without being shamed into being guilty about it is... fine. I don't personally agree with it, but it's fine. My problem is the sluts. Now, sluts are just histrionic whores who blow up at the slightest provocation, flaunt their sexuality, and use it as a popularity booster, essentially standing on a soapbox and saying 'look at me, I have a vagina and I will fuck you if you have a heartbeat.' I shame the hell outta sluts. I do not shame women who enjoy sex discreetly and copiously.

21 min later 5231643 Anonymous
>>5231633 >inb4 but stealing hurts other people while whoring doesn't

22 min later 5231651 Anonymous
>>5231634 oh, ok. so you'd rather have a girlfriend that doesn't enjoy sex. well, if that's your thing, i'm not going to stop you, but believe me, i would get tired of that shit pretty quick.

23 min later 5231662 Anonymous
>>5231633 no, there's actual laws against stealing. there's no law against "sin," it's a purely religious concept

23 min later 5231664 Anonymous
I think sluts shouldn't be allowed to have abortions. The entire idea that you'd willingly fuck anyone and everyone without any consideration of the kind of consequences it can bring is heartbreaking.

24 min later 5231678 Anonymous
>>5231662 There's plenty of laws against "sin", go outside of America and see for yourself. Take your slut ways to the Middle East and enjoy being stoned.

25 min later 5231694 Anonymous
>>5231662 There used to be laws against being a slut. We should just revoke these laws against stealing too, since the only reason they're in place is because North America is still tied to its christian roots.

25 min later 5231696 Anonymous
>>5231651 I'd rather one who enjoys sex within a committed, long-term relationship with someone she cares for.

26 min later 5231699 Anonymous
Women have it wayyyy easier when it comes to sex. There was slut shaming to balance things out, now there is nothing.

26 min later 5231707 Anonymous (1358021251373.png 640x272 353kB)
>>5231572 >mfw I've called many a girl I've fucked a 'slut' because that's what they are. Stop white-knighting, this is r9k.

27 min later 5231714 Anonymous
>>5231572 >slut" is an awful term used by people to shame girls who aren't having sex with -them- Why the hell would straight girls call other girls sluts then?

27 min later 5231715 Anonymous
>>5231469 It depends on how it comes up in conversation, if you are constantly ranting about GODDAMN SLUTWHORE SKANKS MANG or you start the conversation about it in a sanctimonious or holier than thou way it's going to annoy people, especially sluts, but if its just coming up in conversation and you just say "well I don't like it personally" then nobody can bitch about your fucking opinions because they are YOUR opinions and this is MURRIKA

28 min later 5231729 Anonymous
>>5231385 >sluts Don't want to date or fuck them. >slut-shaming Exists, but nowhere near as much as people get butthurt about it. >ever say you don't want to date a girl who fucks around a lot >WOW SLUT SHAMER FUCK OFF YOU'RE OPPRESSING WOMEN, HELP I'M BEING OPPRESSED! >various other insults, "prude," "fag," "woman hater," etc. etc. >not allowed to have your own opinion if they disagree with it I don't care how many people another woman has had sex with, but I can certainly choose not have sex or be in a relationship with her, that's my choice. Also, more women insult other women for being virgins or not going out etc. than they insult women for being 'sluts.' It's the same stuff you put up with when you were in high school, after a certain point you're expected to have had sex with at least one person and it's "weird" if you don't or don't want to

28 min later 5231730 Anonymous
>>5231572 Whatever whore

29 min later 5231732 Anonymous
>>5231715 >then nobody can bitch about your fucking opinions because they are YOUR opinions and this is MURRIKA But because this is MURRIKA they CAN bitch about your opinions. Freedom of speech and all that. And opinions only go so far; if it's considered a hate crime, prepare to pay for your OPINIONS. Great country.

29 min later 5231736 Anonymous
>>5231707 Yeah, they all love being called dirty sluts while in the heat of it. Feels nice to have that moment to not only get away with it, but get them off from it.

30 min later 5231746 Anonymous
>>5231732 >tfw slut-shaming will soon be considered a hate crime

30 min later 5231748 Anonymous
that's odd, because all of my female friends are into the whole "throwing bricks at sluts" jokes thing. then again, there's a definite lack of "acceptance movements" in australia. the only mass movement that ever happens in this country is to the bottle-o whenever there's a public holiday coming. >tfw fat acceptance, slutwalk, DIE CIS SCUM and all that cancerous liberal bullshit is a bare minimum here >feels good man

31 min later 5231756 Anonymous
>>5231651 >dating a slut The only sluts that are in relationships are cheating on the guys, otherwise they aren't sluts, your premise is flawed you can't be a monogamous slut

32 min later 5231766 Anonymous
>>5231748 On your knees peasant, it's time for your daily dose of lebo dick

32 min later 5231769 Anonymous (1355896038706.png 770x696 255kB)
>>5231748 These movements seem to exist only online and the few hipster girls that carry it off of tumblr. I've honestly never met anyone who has heard of half of the tumblr movements going around. >my friends face when explaining "transfat" to them

33 min later 5231776 Anonymous
>>5231385 i dont understand "slut-shaming" are they implying that having sex with lots of different people is not a bad thing? tell that to any fucking doctor. even with condoms and the like, there is still a chance to catch a disease if someone is carrying it. the only true way to lower the chances of such things is to avoid behaving in that way. its like these sluts never listened in sex education classes.

33 min later 5231779 Anonymous
>>5231572 >yfw I've called girls sluts in bed mid-sex and they were like "oh yeah baby I'm a slut!" or words to that effect Don't even deny it ladies you love being slut shamed

34 min later 5231801 Anonymous
>>5231736 Did I say 'while having sex with'? I had had sex with them, was in a relationship, and I called them a slut. If they were, of course, sluts. The point being, we don't call girls sluts because they don't sleep with us. We call them sluts because they're awful people. It's a label, and as much as 'labels hurt feeligns wah wah wah' we will always have labels, and they will always be useful.

36 min later 5231822 Anonymous
>>5231776 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23574940/ns/health-childrens_hea lth/t/teen-girls-has-sexually-transmitted-disease/#.UPOTJG80 WSo They don't care.

38 min later 5231856 Anonymous (loads of money is the shout I utter.jpg 200x200 5kB)
Hold on a minute, I've been told that I'm a huge jerk! Can I start the movement against "jerk-shaming"? I should be allowed to be a cunt if I want to be and people should respect my right to be a total asshole if I want to be.

38 min later 5231858 Anonymous
>>5231801 This. Someone who exemplifies black culture at its worst is a nigger. Someone who does nothing all day is lazy. Someone who gets worked up over nothing is a pussy. Someone who fucks around indiscriminately is a slut.

38 min later 5231861 Anonymous
>>5231776 its just women passing on responsibility again. they dont want to feel bad for bahaving like sluts, so instead of changing their ways they attack those who call them out on their slutness and claim it is THEY who have the problem. textbook modern feminism. enjpoy your empowerment ladies. and your gonorrhea.

43 min later 5231927 Anonymous
i don't give a damn what kind of sex ppl do in their own time, but i neither want to have to hear about it nor be made to feel bad for not being super supportive when they insist on telling me anyhow. former friend told me a while back about how he was dumping his wife of 20+ years because she had a car accident and some mild brain damage (she still works, but occasionally forgets things)...and that by "dumping" he meant that he had asked some guy he met in a bar to come move in with him and his wife, and she was going to move out the garage. he expected me to be all happy for him coming out as gay or bi or whatever, and got really pissed when i asked how evelyn felt about it...which meant i heard all about how she wasn't as fun in bed since the accident, and all about his gay sexcapades. i didn't need or want to hear any of this shit. i don't care if you have sex with a sheep and 1962 mercury every night, just don't fucking tell me unless i ask. femanon if that has any relevance in this thread.

45 min later 5231942 Anonymous (1358042700315.jpg 800x542 440kB)
>>5231856 I, too, have been called a huge jerk! Let's start this 'jerk-shaming' movement! How dare they look down on us for doing terrible things? >mfw

45 min later 5231948 Anonymous
>>5231927 >former friend told me a while back about how he was dumping his wife of 20+ years because she had a car accident and some mild brain damage (she still works, but occasionally forgets things)...and that by "dumping" he meant that he had asked some guy he met in a bar to come move in with him and his wife, and she was going to move out the garage. he expected me to be all happy for him coming out as gay or bi or whatever, and got really pissed when i asked how evelyn felt about it...which meant i heard all about how she wasn't as fun in bed since the accident, and all about his gay sexcapades. And here I was enjoying the thread. Damn, what a downer. That's a real fucking shame, and a little disgusting as well. At that point, you've got a responsibility to care for that person, you can't just shove them into your garage while you bang other dudes. Not cool, at least send them off to a home where they WILL be cared for and visit every so often.

45 min later 5231952 Anonymous
>>5231385 Why do you think women are called sluts when they sleep around? Because everyone dislikes them. A tiny part of modern day feminists think 'slut shaming' is a thing and they want to get rid of it. You dont have to take them seriously. Just laugh at her, call her a slut and then cut off contact. Then tell all your friends about how retarded she is and post screencaps of what she said/the website. That's what I would do.

47 min later 5231976 Anonymous
>>5231927 If you're gonna end your post with 'femanon here lololol' you might as well put Fembot or Vagina-Owner on your name field so we can ignore your irrelevant attention-whoring in peace. I don't give a flaming fuck about your gender. I mean christ, it's like you don't even know that 'femanon' is a total oxymoron.

52 min later 5232024 Anonymous
>>5231415 >Welcome to 2013. It sucks. I know that feel. Just the existence of this time period makes me wonder if I've been placed in my own personal hell.

52 min later 5232031 Anonymous
>>5231976 Fuck off, you hyper-sensitive cunt. Jesus. Only a woman could get that worked up about something so trivial.

55 min later 5232074 Anonymous
>>5231927 >he expected me to be all happy for him coming out as gay or bi or whatever I know this feel. Why the fuck do I need to know this? Do I tell you how big a shit I took this morning?

58 min later 5232093 Anonymous
>>5232074 It's kind of a big deal and could change how you think about a person. Some people would feel cheated if someone doesnt tell them such a thing and get all defensive if they find out later on. That said, the one you were quoting actually had a valid reason to be pissed off at the guy.

1 hours later 5232126 Anonymous
>>5231927 >makes his brain damaged wife live in the garage while his gay lover moves in Faggots are monsters

1 hours later 5232131 Anonymous
>>5231572 >Stop offending me!

1 hours later 5232142 Anonymous
>>5232031 >defending the femanon I hear swami needs some more bootlickers, faggot

1 hours later 5232175 Anonymous
>>5231477 Sex is a very broad term. It encompasses so many different possibilities. Under your line of reasoning, it sounds like if a random person walked up to you and offered sex, you would take it. Regardless if it's a man, woman, midget, or paraplegic. That can't be healthy for either of the two involved.

1 hours later 5232184 Anonymous (sexy giratina mkIII_crop.png 135x138 43kB)
>>5232074 >>5232093 I dunno, it's kind of A Thing. It's basically like admitting you're intrinsically not normal. The one time I overtly, obviously and purposefully let something slip around my friends, our Token Gay Friend (who's really really gay, even among our circle which has a strong lgbt presence) actually said "Aww" and this bi guy who I had been lusting after once rubbed my leg and everything it is A THING though obvs. if it comes with a lot of things about the person being a shitheel, you have no obligation to like them for being a shitheel. but at least don't go belittling them for liking dudes belittle them for being a shitheel

1 hours later 5232186 Anonymous
>>5231437 Except if she's a slut she's demonstrated an innate inability to contain her sexual desires and thus she devalues herself as a woman. A woman who has been a slut implies that it will take a great deal of effort to get her to stop being a slut and settle down. And a woman who's 'done with being a slut' is either a liar or used goods and thus not worth pursuing.

1 hours later 5232193 Anonymous
>>5231643 >inb4 whores spread diseases

1 hours later 5232199 Tumblina (xkw.png 644x480 785kB)
>>5231385 >"slut shaming" (like that's a negative thing?) Weren't you ever taught that if you have nothing nice to say, you shouldn't say anything at all? Apparently not, so listen up: You went out of your way to harass and manipulate a person into feeling ashamed. You received backlash. Funnily enough, freedom to express your opinion is a two way street. >mfw people don't understand this >inb4 slut for not wearing burka

1 hours later 5232205 Anonymous
I dont see why slut shaming is wrong. Sluts get tons of really hot sex, and yet they still complain about being called names. They have perfect lives, yet they are so ungrateful. Sluts want people like me to respect them, even though they dont respect us. The haves are basically accusing the have-nots of being oppressors. That is just stupidity

1 hours later 5232216 Anonymous
>>5232199 >tumblina lol. I am guessing you are a troll

1 hours later 5232231 Anonymous
>>5232199 >out of your way He was just expressing his opinion. And he wasnt even expressing his judgement on HER, but on sluts in general. She is the one that evidently identifies herself as a slut. And we're not discussing whether or not she had the right to say what she did to OP, but we're discussing her opinion.

1 hours later 5232237 Anonymous
>>5232193 It is not just diseases, it is also the fact that female sexual liberation means women would fuck only the hottest guys, and only consider settling down once they are in their thirties. Before the sexual revolution, it was reasonable for an average guy to get a cute college aged girl who was a virgin as his wife. Women would have adult children and still be relatively young and attractive. The current sexual regime is going to hurt women in the long run, however

1 hours later 5232319 Anonymous
>>5232237 It sounds like you're pissed because your chances of marrying a young virgin girl are lower. That's not a valid reason to hate sluts. Hate them because you don't agree with hedonistic ideology; not because they poison your dating pool.

1 hours later 5232360 Tumblina (polduck.jpg 1000x1000 74kB)
>>5232231 >He was just expressing his opinion "Slut" is not a descriptive word, it's an insult. He didn't express any opinion, he simply spat out a derogatory word (either because he's too stupid to understand it's a buzzword or to intentionally provoke). >he wasnt even expressing his judgement on HER, but on sluts in general. She is the one that evidently identifies herself as a slut. No, because as above it isn't a neutral term but an insult and when you insult someone they tend to get.... insulted. >And we're not discussing whether or not she had the right to say what she did to OP The post was quite obviously addressed to the OP, not you or the general discussion.

1 hours later 5232388 Anonymous
>>5232319 Drastically lower, it is extremely unlikely. Yeah, that's a good reason to be pissed off.

1 hours later 5232414 Anonymous (the hirigana just say 'haa'.png 430x500 239kB)
>tfw you freely call yourself a slut or ask others if you're being slutty because that's just how you do like it is it's negative but is still a word with meaning. it's still descriptive. you can call someone gay as an insult and rant and rave about how that's wrong, but it's still a word that describes a certain type of person. the issue is the type being offensive, not the word itself

1 hours later 5232416 Anonymous
>>5232388 Most women aren't promiscuous. But that doesn't matter. Your definition of a slut = non-virgin. Have fun being alone.

1 hours later 5232418 Anonymous
>>5232360 What exactly dont you understand? OP said he disliked SLUTS. It was supposed to be derogatory, because he was talking about the kind of people he disliked. He didnt say he disliked the girl he was talking with, but she chose to take it personally and actually attacking him instead of the point he made.

1 hours later 5232422 Anonymous
>>5232414 >because that's just how you do like it is What?

1 hours later 5232427 Anonymous
>>5232416 Yeah they are, and no, that's not my definition. I would consider that girl used goods, but that's different than being a slut. Slut = enter the gas chamber, used goods = unfortunate.

1 hours later 5232444 Anonymous
>>5232422 Nigga, you think it be like how one does like how it do, but really, you just gotta do like how you think you gotta be. You be how you gotta do, and do how you gotta be like. When you do like how it is, you are doing according to your personal belief of how it be. You are doing not how you ought to do, or how you should be, but you are just being like how you do and doing how you be. You are feeling, and not thinking. Be tanasinn, anon. Don't think; Feel.

1 hours later 5232460 Anonymous
Actually, I enjoy a slutty-looking woman. But, I guess that's just me.

1 hours later 5232478 Anonymous
>hang out with slut >she's giving me a handjob >she makes way to give me head >all good and well since I'm in the mood >finish let me guess I have some sort of STD now

1 hours later 5232519 Anonymous
>>5232444 You always do what you think is right. If you do something that you don't think is right, then you're lying to yourself. If you didn't think it was right, you wouldn't do it. Everyone has their own morals. What people don't realize is that what other people think has a great effect on them. Feeling instead of thinking means that you're doing what you think is right, and not what other people think is right.

1 hours later 5232535 Anonymous
>>5232478 There's a 50/50 chance that you've got the Purple Herples.

1 hours later 5232563 Anonymous (image.jpg 900x709 215kB)
This image explains all. Sluts exist because a woman who can't control herself is not considered a women worth any time. Being a slut shows no rewarding qualities for a normal relationship, that's why people hate sluts and why sluts are called sluts and looked down upon in society.

1 hours later 5232584 Anonymous
>>5232563 >What is birth control: The Picture

1 hours later 5232615 Anonymous
>>5232584 You're an idiot It's based on biological instinct, birth control or not its still relevant

2 hours later 5232687 Anonymous
>>5232615 We're not slaves to our biological insticts anymore. Society changes, people change. We into empathy now, for one.

2 hours later 5232727 Anonymous
>>5232687 >We're not slaves to our biological instincts >Women have tons of sex because it feels good We may not follow biological imperatives, but that doesn't mean that we aren't primitive.

2 hours later 5232738 Anonymous
>>5232687 No amount of technology in the world would cause an animal(us) to lose the biological tendencies.

2 hours later 5232758 Anonymous
>>5232615 >We're not slaves to our biological insticts anymore. >Hey, sex feels good, so we should all have it.

2 hours later 5232779 Anonymous
>>5232738 We arent the same as every other animal. Fact is we dont understand why we do things. It's all speculation. There's been a lot of rapid change in the world. Pretending you know where this comes from and hiding behind evolutionary biology is a lousy attempt at trying to justify your own gut feeling.

2 hours later 5232818 Anonymous
>>5231385 I think the real reason many people are against slut-shaming is because of the obvious; women are shamed for promiscuous sexual behavior and men are not. Its kind of an all or nothing kind of thing. You either shame both men and women for promiscuous behavior alike, or you cease to shame only women.

2 hours later 5232819 Anonymous
>>5232687 If that were true then the concept of attractiveness wouldn't exist anymore, since it is built entirely around how successful a person's offspring would be. >>5232779 Evolution produces gut feelings, though. It's an entirely correct justification.

2 hours later 5232857 Anonymous
>>5232819 >since it is built entirely around how successful a person's offspring would be. Yet women go for attractive looking loser drug addicts all the time. That certainly wouldnt make for good offspring. >Evolution produces gut feelings, though. It's an entirely correct justification. Or maybe we're in the process of adapting to the society we created and have mixed emotions about it all and dont know how to deal with it. Saying: 'every other animal does X aswell!' is kind of stupid. Does every other animal have thoughts and emotions as complex as we do? When did any other animal every build a car so they could get to their destination faster? We're much more advanced than that and we're much more advanced than that picture implied we are.

2 hours later 5232881 Anonymous
>receiving head from slut >cum >guess she swallowed >not sure how much or little I came because it was too difficult to gauge from just feeling >still curious

2 hours later 5232935 Anonymous (Not amused.jpg 165x166 4kB)
>>5232758 Thus proving we still suck at moderation.

2 hours later 5233043 Anonymous (aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa fuck.gif 245x294 739kB)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUGH

2 hours later 5233059 Tumblina
>>5232418 >What exactly dont you understand? Insults are insults regardless of whether you thinly veil them by pretending you're just offhand mentioning how much you hate a third party. It's you who doesn't understand.

2 hours later 5233073 Anonymous
>>5233059 >my paranoia about how everyone is out to insult and get me is completely justified and not a fault in my character at all Okay then. That's clear.

2 hours later 5233110 Anonymous
>>5232319 I dont want to marry a virgin. I want to marry a slut, but without slut shaming, said sluts just chase after hot alphas who only see them and pump and dump material, instead of betas who admire their sluttiness

2 hours later 5233127 Tumblina
>>5233073 >my paranoia about how everyone is out to insult and get me is completely justified and not a fault in my character at all Lol, some people are just complete fucking idiots

3 hours later 5233197 Anonymous
>>5233127 >no argument are you the newest femslut trip?

3 hours later 5233220 Tumblina (1356751563662.png 500x500 49kB)
>>5233197 Whose argument am I supposed to be responding to, the person who avoided the argument and attacked my character instead??

3 hours later 5233262 Anonymous
Lel, yall betas is so delusional

3 hours later 5233270 Anonymous
I told somebody the same thing and he said "it doesn't hurt anybody." I guess living in a morally bankrupt society is completely harmless. When did everybody become such degenerates?

3 hours later 5233295 Anonymous
>>5233262 Why are cumdumpsters the absolute worst posters in every thing?

3 hours later 5233330 Anonymous
>>5232360 >"Slut" is not a descriptive word is this swami's new persona trying to be all edgy and shit on purpose? slut is very descriptive

3 hours later 5233429 Anonymous
>>5233262 Not a cum dumpster. Just a dude who understands how to get laid. PROTIP: Girls can tell if you judge them as sluts via subtle subconscious cues and body language. Bitches are the experts at reading in between the lines. If you can manipulate this to your advantage, you're good. If you think she's a slut, she's not going to fuck you. Sorry, but girls don't put out for sexually judgmental dudes.

3 hours later 5233496 Anonymous
>>5233270 Every generation is considered to be worse than the last. The generation before you thinks that you are a piece of shit.

4 hours later 5233619 Tumblina (the skinning.jpg 444x346 31kB)
>>5233330 No, slut is: x Subjective x Derogatory x Vague in common usage Those three things make it an insult or a buzzword. Work on your vocabulary, m8.

4 hours later 5233750 Anonymous
>>5232857 The women who go for loser drug addicts are usually loser drug addicts themselves thus relying on their basic biological trait to procreate because no serious male would go for her. Also Other animals do have thoughts and emotions just not as complex or as advanced as us, but to say that we are so superior and have lost all our basic instincts because of society is just ignorant.

4 hours later 5233772 Anonymous
>>5233750 Attractive looking COMPLETE loser drug addict here. I've had attractive married women cheat on their hard working successful husband with me. They did not use drugs. And turned down drugs when I offered them.

4 hours later 5233783 Anonymous
>>5233059 >oh no I did something bad but don't insult me because it hurts my feelings. People get insulted all the time because they did stupid shit, instead of trying to place the blame on something else why don't you just accept it and try to better it?

4 hours later 5233830 Anonymous
>>5233619 It still doesn't make it a non-descriptive word. How fucking dumb are you. If you are promiscuous then slut would describe what you are. It's not a hard concept

5 hours later 5234015 Tumblina (nup.png 246x434 4kB)
>>5233783 You're a niggerfaggot. ^why don't you accept it and try to better it? Because it's a meaningless insult. >>5233830 >It still doesn't make it a non-descriptive word When you're applying a descriptive word to designate a population, that population needs to actually be defined. It's useless in the context OP was using it because it can't do this.

5 hours later 5234093 Anonymous
>>5234015 If its a meaningless insult then why are you acting like saying it is the end of the world? And that goes for the people in OP's post as well.

5 hours later 5234132 Anonymous
>>5234015 The definition would be promiscuous...?

5 hours later 5234174 Anonymous
>>5231662 >laws = morals hilarious

5 hours later 5234308 Tumblina
>>5234093 >If its a meaningless insult then why are you acting like saying it is the end of the world? I'm not, just correcting him. P.S You don't get to run away and claim the argument doesn't matter after spending time debating it, lol >>5234132 How would you determine who was promiscuous and who wasn't?

5 hours later 5234386 Worth
I don't like sluts either. One night stands gross me out. Fuckbuddies I'm kind of okay with, it's just sex between people that don't know each other well is weird and gross to me. As far as slut shaming goes... well, I don't like sluts but they're free to do whatever they want and shouldn't be shamed or hassled about it. However they also shouldn't expect everyone to be totally comfortable with their behavior and bend over backwards to tell them it's okay for them to do what they do.

5 hours later 5234403 Tumblina
>>5234386 >However they also shouldn't expect everyone to be totally comfortable with their behavior and bend over backwards to tell them it's okay for them to do what they do. There's a difference between expecting a lack of abuse from other adults for doing something you have a right to do, and expecting others to pretend to agree with the thing you're doing.

6 hours later 5234438 Anonymous
>>5234403 >There's a difference between expecting a lack of abuse from other adults for doing something you have a right to do, and expecting others to pretend to agree with the thing you're doing. I have a right to wipe a booger on my dinner plate, but I'd expect some abuse for doing it.

6 hours later 5234478 Anonymous
I call my best female friend a slut when ever she well, sluts it around. She's still fun to hang around with, and has sex with me. But, she by definition, is a slut. When she tells me she cheated on her boyfriend? I'll tell her to stop being a fucking slut. When she fucks 3 different guys in a week, or perhaps the same night and then bitches about why guys just use her for sex? I'll tell her that if she stopped being such a slut, maybe guys would take her seriously when it came to relationships. She wanted to be my girlfriend but I told her no because she's a cheating slut. Girls FUCK A LOTA DUDES are by definitions, sluts. Doing this and thinking you're not a slut is like a heroin addict shooting up then screaming >IM NOT A FUCKING JUNKIE I won't hate you as a person for being a slut. But you are not someone I'd be in a relationship with, or ever fall in love with. And no, I don't expect women to be virgins, or close to it. I am not bothered by 'cum on face' or anything of the sort. But, I see girls that fuck lots of guys, not good relationship material. They like strange cock just a bit too much to be taken seriously. I'd sooner date a prostitute who was willing to quit her job than a slut. The reason being, she was doing it because she doing it for money to support her drug addiction/college education/children/just wanted easy money. The slut does it soley because she is >bored >needs male validation >not satisfied with a single partner

7 hours later 5234877 Anonymous (i'dliketosolvethepuzzle.gif 384x286 245kB)
>>5234478 I have a handy guide for this. >A girl that only fucks one guy Normal. >A girl that fucks two guys Gets around >A girl that fucks three+ Slut. Plain and simple. I believe that the more you have sex out of lust and not love, the bigger the slut you are. If two people love one another and fuck a lot, sure they're raunchy bastards, but neither are a slut. It isn't a case of how often you have sex, but with how many people and why.

7 hours later 5234927 Anonymous
>Am I really that alone in disliking slutty people? No. >Is that unreasonable of me? You'd get different answers to that one, I'd say since it's an emotional thing why would it even have to be reasonable? >I shouldn't think so, especially considering I've hung with you guys a while. However, having people agree with you on here (especially if they don't in the outside world) isn't necessarily a good sign at all. My own opinion on sluts, I don't mind them. I think some are truly happy with "expressing their sexuality" this way, I think there are also quite some who actually don't feel happy with it at all. Slut-shaming, I don't think there's anything wrong with feeling uncomfortable about the idea of this or similar things, but I agree with the girl on the "grow up" comment in the sense that other people doing things that don't harm anyone directly shouldn't be a concern of yours. If you don't like the concept, sure, if you don't want to date one, sure. If you dislike people because of their sexual behaviour, that's odd at most with me, not more morally rejectable than disliking them because of other behavioural aspects. However >"slut shaming" (like that's a negative thing?) these girls want to fuck a lot. They have people who want to fuck them. The story ends there, both parties are okay with that (not going to use the term happy because of what I said earlier), I don't see why you should feel in the right position to judge them for it - vocally, at least, do whatever you want inside your head. >inb4 "but sluts undermine society" - possibly, lots of stuff does, lots of people do, most don't get nearly as much shit for it, people just feel more morally adversed towards sluts and that's not a legitimate motive for a hate campaign imo

7 hours later 5234956 Anonymous
>>5234927 >vocally, at least, do whatever you want inside your head. Forgot to add but I was referring to actual slut shaming campaigns or whatever, not your comment from the OP. I should've said publicly instead of vocally.

7 hours later 5235015 Anonymous
>>5234877 This. Theres nothing wrong with sleeping with someone youre dating and you care about. Loveless sex just seems.. i dont know. Pointless, childish? I know a guy who has slept with a lot of girls and says he never loved any of them. 8 plus loveless relationships and slept with all the girls within a week of dating. But he says im dumb for being grossed out because he was in brief relatinships and didnt cheat. You might as well just be fuck buddies. Im a shy person and that sort of thing is intimate and personal to me, id be disgusted in myself if i did the sort of things he did.

7 hours later 5235042 Anonymous
I have really mixed feelings on sluts. Part of me finds the idea of a women sleeping with lots of guys disgusting, then the other part of me doesn't give a fuck. I was on a date with a girl when we got to the topic of sex and suddenly I was like "What if she's slept with 2 dozen guys?". I don't know what to feel robots.

7 hours later 5235063 Anonymous
>>5235015 I think I'm onto something with the love tieing into sex thing. Everyone I know says it's much better if you're in love. If sex was limited to this, we wouldn't have so many sluts.

7 hours later 5235082 Anonymous
>>5235063 Not the anon you were responding to, but in that case how do you feel about a girl who's had sex with four people she genuinely loved? Over the course of ten or even fifteen years, that's very much possible.

7 hours later 5235108 Anonymous (feminists and nazis.jpg 500x500 138kB)
>>5235082 I'd find it somewhat difficult to believe, but if she was telling the truth, then I wouldn't call her a slut... But I would chide her for falling so easily.

8 hours later 5235120 Anonymous
OP you obviously need practice dealing with normals. You have to learn to hide your real feelings and opinions if you don't want to be ridiculed. There are just too many of the normalfags and they will do anything to protect their way of life.

8 hours later 5235125 Anonymous
>>5235108 Mm, alright, I guess our definitions of easily vary... if you say she's been sexually active from 15 to 30, for easy numbers, then she could've had four relationships, two of two years and two of three, and still take a year to fall in love with every guy.

8 hours later 5235137 Anonymous (whyy.jpg 198x237 5kB)
>>5235125 The hypothetical woman you're talking of seems to be finding the wrong men. Assuming she did genuinely love each and every one she slept with, that's sweet but depressing to think about. Imagine how often this hypothetical woman thinks about them and how much it hurts. Someone, somewhere might have been through this. She's better than a slut, though.

8 hours later 5235152 Anonymous
>>5235082 I'm think I'm pretty reasonable, and normal when it comes to views of sexuality. 3 partners doesn't make a girl a slut. I'd say 10-15 is maximum by the time college is over. A girl who has sex with a guy, then doesn't like him. Then finds a new guy, and doesn't like him, and etc... is fine. I'd be fine with a girl like this if she fucked 30 men. A girl who has sex with more than one man at once (As in, 2 or more fuck buddies at the same time) is a no good slut in my opinion and is prone to cheating since she likes mulitple partners at the same time.

8 hours later 5235159 Anonymous
>>5235137 I don't know, sometimes love just fades away. I am not really the right person to even say that but my mother has been married before, I'm quite positive she loved that man (if only for the trouble she went through for him) but at the same time don't feel like she misses him at all. She knows he has a wife who's better suited to him and that she's better off with my father. (The main thing that caused my mother to divorce him was that he'd said before that he wanted children, but once married changed his mind, and she really wanted them.)

8 hours later 5235182 Anonymous
>>5235152 Yeah, I'm aware his view isn't the most common one, I just wondered because the number thing seemed rather rigid to me for someone who said to focus on love vs lust mainly. Huh, I have to say your last point surprised me, I don't really think liking two partners at the same time sexually says much about whether you'd want that in a happy relationship, let alone whether you'd seek it out and. There are cuckolds who are actually very jealous of their girlfriend and can't even roleplay to her doing stuff with someone else, despite fantasizing about it.

8 hours later 5235233 Tumbleequa (oh girl.jpg 1268x1456 136kB)
>>5234438 >I have a right to wipe a booger on my dinner plate, but I'd expect some abuse for doing it. Argue the point we're talking about, goober >>5235015 >Loveless sex just seems.. i dont know. Pointless, childish? It's embarrassingly childish that people actually look down on others for engaging in pleasurable activity without self-flagellating, god forbid someone actually enjoy themselves without equal measure of suffering and guilt.

8 hours later 5235235 Anonymous
>>5235182 Enjoying two different partners at once means you're not satisfied with monogamy deep down. I've had two FWB at once, and I much prefer having a single girl I like. A girl with the same mindset is ideal. Girls who aren't satisfied with one guy at a time, are the type of girl who grows bored of people and cheats.

8 hours later 5235245 Anonymous
>>5235233 >It's embarrassingly childish lol irony

8 hours later 5235250 Anonymous (science.png 967x478 162kB)
>>5235120 >There are just too many of the normalfags and they will do anything to protect their way of life. This. Every normalfag is a subhuman retard.

8 hours later 5235277 Tumbleequa-na-deshawn (the skinnington.jpg 444x346 32kB)
>>5235245 I was criticising his childish and idiotic worldview, the fact I used a word he did while disagreeing with him does not imply irony. Idiot.

8 hours later 5235290 Anonymous
>>5235277 your whole argument is based on the idea that insults are subjective and meaningless you're fucking inconsistent and it's ironic that you're doing to him what he does tosluts

8 hours later 5235300 Anonymous
I don't agree to slut shaming. People can do what they want in private. But I don't hold promiscuity and having a lot of sexual partners in high regard. It's an issue if you feel that way about women only though. A man who sleeps around a lot is same a woman who does.

8 hours later 5235307 Anonymous
>>5235300 mansluts are generally shamed too also there's a reason the double standard exists

8 hours later 5235309 Anonymous
>>5235235 Your example makes more sense to me, especially as the way I see it "threesome lust" wouldn't be solved by fucking two men separately as that's obviously not the same experience, so then I guess she'd have to cheat on you with two guys. I don't know, I don't think I even know anyone who's been in one but I guess it always seemed possible for me to enjoy it just for the experience and not necessarily need to have more. Like a lot of people do with psychedelic drugs or something.

8 hours later 5235315 Anonymous
>>5231385 Sounds like you know a lot of sluts.

8 hours later 5235323 Anonymous
>>5235307 The only reason it exists is because "men are biologically programmed hurrrr" In which case, if we're talking about biological programming, women should be allowed to get pregnant by an alpha then settle for the beta to support her without being shamed. OR, leaving her partner for someone better, without being shamed. But don't use the fucking biological programming excuse, fucking don't, it's dumb, just admit you don't like sluts. And man sluts are only shamed if they treat girls bad.

8 hours later 5235331 Anonymous
>>5235323 >In which case, if we're talking about biological programming, women should be allowed to get pregnant by an alpha then settle for the beta to support her without being shamed. are you retarded? in what context is support biological?

8 hours later 5235333 Anonymous
>>5235309 >not need to have more >comparing a sexual experience (similar to a hard drug high) to a psychedelic experience >implying you don't gain a 'tolerance' to porn and more extreme/wild/taboo sexual activities just like hard drugs Seeing two people at once or a threesome (or more) = slut that's no good for anything but pumping and dumping

8 hours later 5235338 Anonymous
>>5231460 What does what comes out of my mouth in regards to whores being whores have to do with any whores?

8 hours later 5235351 dudebro
Unless they've done something particularly wrong to you its better to go with 'I'm not into sex outside of committed relationships' than 'I don't like when other people have sex outside committed relationships' The former is fine cause its a personal choice, the other is questionable cause you're trying to dictate a moral standard to others in an area where most people agree everyone is free to do what they want

8 hours later 5235353 Anonymous
>>5231477 No, I wouldn't because I would prefer just to look at porn and avoid the whole relationship/ drama of it all.

8 hours later 5235373 Anonymous
>>5231565 >implying religion is the only reason to abstain from sex.

8 hours later 5235382 Tumbleequa-na-deshawn (hue hue hue.jpg 361x385 142kB)
>>5235290 >insults are subjective and meaningless ...when expressing one's beliefs and opinions Sheesh, you fail basic reading comprehension, 99% chance you're North American

8 hours later 5235410 Anonymous (back to the shithole.png 448x421 225kB)
People, just stop replying to the reddit whore. He (for shame if that's a she) knows how controversial his opinion is here and is fishing for replies. You know, "trolling". Have the good sense to ignore it. Meanwhile, gb2reddit you tumblr slut.

8 hours later 5235411 Anonymous
>>5235333 Comparing sex to a hard drug? In that case having sex would cause you to keep wanting to have more sex until you die from dehydration or something, that doesn't seem like a fitting analogy. And resistence to porn usually happens if you watch the same shit for god knows how many weeks, months or in some cases years, not because you watched "deflowering of Amanda" once and now need "fistfuckers hardcore" to get off.

8 hours later 5235425 Anonymous
>>5235411 I'm talking about pleasure levels. You know once you shoot dope you can never sniff it or smoke it and be truly satisfied with the high? Girls getting fucked in all holes at once is a similar concept. Or different types of men depending on her taste that day of the week.

8 hours later 5235458 Anonymous
>>5235382 you're doing the same thing >insults only work for me because I said so stop being retarded

9 hours later 5235499 Anonymous
>Am I really that alone in disliking slutty people? Is that unreasonable of me? It's an instinctive male response. Sluts provide absolutely no protection or guarantee that when said slut ends up pregnant that the offspring will be yours, and even in a world with widely available birth control, men still instinctively find slutty behavior to be repulsive when it comes to developing respect or forming emotional attachment. tl;dr sluts are for fun, not for family, and that's how it's always going to be in the eyes of men.

9 hours later 5235502 Anonymous
>>5235425 I guess that only works if you think it's objectively better. Can't say I have personal experience but I find that hard to imagine, I think whether or not it feels better really depends on the people and circumstances more than on the sex act itself.

10 hours later 5235867 Tumbleequa-nah-deshawn (Drone1.jpg 980x705 39kB)
>>5235410 >she's schooling me too hard >G-GO TO REDDIT! Reaction memes trump logic! pic related, describes you well >>5235458 I'm criticising his point, not expressing an opinion nooblet

10 hours later 5235893 Anonymous
It's your opinion and isn't ridiculous enough to be invalid. I personally don't have an issue with sex that isn't intimate. Sex is fun, and if you can have sex with your friend, why not? Me and my best friend have threesomes with his girlfriend on the regular.

13 hours later 5237049 Anonymous
>>5235893 I could argue with you over that, but I don't see the point. The best perceivable result would be agreeing to disagree. >>5235867 Tumblr, pls go, your embarressing you'reself

4.168 0.378