4chan archive /r9k/ (index)
similar threads
2013-01-13 03:56 5221576 Anonymous (kjgldsiuasgfkl.png 848x485 1063kB)
Why do you believe that a woman's worth is inversely proportional to the amount of men she has been with? It just makes women more selective with whom they choose to sleep with. You don't measure up. You are not an alpha male. But you still think you deserve a virgin, for a multitude of possible reasons- maybe you think you are a nice guy. You hate the fact that she only wants to sleep with 'assholes', but these assholes obviously have more to offer in her eyes than you do. You men call women sluts for having sex, but it's really only because she won't sleep with you. You feel entitled to her body. And the fact that she won't give her prized virginity to you is the reason for your bitterness. But you can't be surprised by this, because your gender created this problem for you. Where you want women to not have sex, and yet you hate them for not choosing you as their sexual partner. What do you expect? If a woman's sexual value is controlled by how many men she has been with, then of course she is going to be picky. Of course she won't choose you. Because you aren't an alpha male. You don't deserve to take the thing from her that society dictates controls her value, no matter how much you want it. Your gender created the rules. You're just mad that women follow the rules your gender created, and you come out with nothing. So please, /r9k/. Remind me why you hate feminism. Remind me why you keep using words like slut and whore and cum dumpster, when it does nothing to help you or your breed of men. Remind me why you continue to slut shame women, when all it results in is less women choosing to have sex with you. Remind me why it would be a bad thing for women to be more sexually liberated.

2 min later 5221592 Anonymous
finally. i agree, OP. women need to be EVEN SLUTTIER. then i might have a chance of getting laid. thanks for this post.

4 min later 5221602 Anonymous
Realistically, I just hope women want what I want - a nice, quiet monogamous relationship punctuated by interesting bits. Despite what /r9k/ thinks, I'm pretty sure most of them DO want this.

7 min later 5221625 Anonymous
>>5221592 Judging women as sluts is part of the problem, though. Slut is a negative word which basically puts a negative implication on the idea of women being able to have more sex without being judged by society. If men kept calling women sluts, women would just continually respond by withholding sex from the majority of the male population. After all, if you can only have a little, you may as well have the best males right?

8 min later 5221633 Anonymous (teachman3.jpg 381x395 43kB)
I don't hate these women. I wouldn't be friends or have a relationship with someone who easily lets other people(strangers) into their personal space on a daily basis, truly this is the behavior of a sick animal. Not to talk about diseases and whatnot.

8 min later 5221642 Anonymous
>>5221625 sorry, i meant to say women should be more Free Spirited.

10 min later 5221655 Anonymous
>>5221576 >This much projecting. HOLY COW

11 min later 5221660 Anonymous
>>5221642 sorry, I didn't mean to say anything at all, I just wanted to prostate myself on the ground with my arse in the air and my wallet held above me yelling "FUCKING PEG ME AND BUY YOURSELF A NEW DRESS DEAR"

11 min later 5221661 noko
because feminism is based on hate against males and do not ask for equality. i won't argue with the rest cause its mostly true

11 min later 5221665 Anonymous
>>5221592 also I forgot to say, it's not your place as a male to tell women what they can and can't be. It is your place, however, to stop socially alienating them for making their own decisions, especially in regards to sex and gender.

11 min later 5221671 Anonymous
The difference between a male and female slut is obvious. The average looking women has no problem getting laid, if you taped a sign saying "free sex" to her, and made her stand on a busy street, she would get a lot of offers, plenty from good looking man. Put an average looking man in the same scenario, and aside from hamplanets and uggos, he would not get nearly the same response. A man actually has to work at getting laid, or have something to offer. It's an actual accomplishment for a man. When a woman does it, it's just sort of indulgent. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with a woman sleeping around, but don't try to pretend like it's admirable or anything.

13 min later 5221688 Anonymous
>>5221633 >truly this is the behavior of a sick animal. How so?

13 min later 5221689 Anonymous
>You men call women sluts for having sex, but it's really only because she won't sleep with you. You feel entitled to her body. Wow, women logic 101? Lol you're just jealous? Yeah, that might have worked in middle school, but come on. I don't feel entitled to a whore's body. I could go out and hook up with random gutter sluts if I wanted to. But that's disgusting, and I don't want a girl who is a poor judge of character/is so needy and in constant search of attention that she needs to have sex with a different guy every night. Sluts are shamed because they are fucking stupid, not because hurr the bible or hurr why can't I have that? It's not hard to manipulate a slutty girl.

14 min later 5221696 Anonymous
>>5221671 >it's an actual accomplishment for a man Yeah because women don't have the privilege of being able to sleep around and be hailed in society for doing so. Because men decided that women aren't entitled to the same freedoms as men. Men started this.

15 min later 5221704 Anonymous
>>5221665 Just because you made this thread. I'm gonna join in with the rest of my normalfag friends when they ridicule the cumdumpster they make fun of and occasionally fuck.

16 min later 5221716 Anonymous
>>5221704 Ok you do that, have fun with your ever lasting virginity xo

17 min later 5221723 Anonymous
>>5221696 No, because like i said before, it's not nearly as difficult for an average looking woman to get laid than it is for an average looking man.

17 min later 5221726 Anonymous
>>5221696 >Men started this. Yes, thousands of years ago when none of us were alive. Here, right now, a number of women are taking their revenge against a generation of men who haven't really done anything wrong.

18 min later 5221728 Anonymous
>>5221689 >completely missing every point made in the OP >2013

19 min later 5221738 Anonymous
>>5221689 What if said girl just enjoyed sex, like another person enjoys a good run?

19 min later 5221739 Anonymous
>>5221576 >Why do you believe that a woman's worth is inversely proportional to the amount of men she has been with? It's basic math/economics. Demand and offer. A promiscuous person increases the offer for their sexual organs, thus reducing their value. The easier it is to get a certain vagina, the less valuable it becomes (to the point of being repulsive). The more rare and difficult to obtain the more valuable the vagina (because of the demand/offer law). Stupid people don't grasp this basic concept, and devalue their properties, BAD investment, given that there's no turning back, the value of a vagina can only fall (with the number of partners and the age of the owner).

19 min later 5221745 Anonymous
>>5221716 yes because treating women with respect and dignity gets you laid.

20 min later 5221751 Anonymous
>>5221723 YEAH BECAUSE WOMEN HAVE TO BE SELECTIVE SEXUALLY, NO ONE WANTS TO BE CALLED A SLUT DO THEY BECAUSE MISOGYNISTIC MEN AND SOCIETY HOW DO YOU NOT GET THIS i didn't mean to write in caps, but i coundn't be bothered retyping

20 min later 5221756 Anonymous
>>5221696 >Yeah because women don't have the privilege of being able to sleep around and be hailed in society for doing so. >Because men decided that women aren't entitled to the same freedoms as men. Men started this. Haha oh wow you sure are dumb. Do we have to go over the shitty locks and keys example again? Do you think us men say, wow that guy has a lot of sex hes pretty cool? Nope. If you're a guy bragging about it that's a whole different thing. Nobody likes it when you brag about how much sex you've had, regardless of gender. Again, all a woman has to do to get sex is not be hideous. But it's males who are privileged, surely.

21 min later 5221762 Anonymous
>>5221745 Not judging women based on their sexual history helps.

23 min later 5221772 Anonymous
>>5221756 >actually believing the lock and key analogy >having an IQ of 55 and thinking any of your opinions are valid In your case, pick both

23 min later 5221773 Anonymous
>>5221762 Not judging the lack of dignity in fucking a donkey helps you get laid by the donkey.

23 min later 5221776 Anonymous
>>5221751 >Implying women are sexually selective in order to hold the upper hand in the dating world

24 min later 5221780 Anonymous
>>5221728 >>5221738 Don't see how I missed any points, actually. You're blaming men for not liking whores. Almost everyone enjoys sex, doesn't mean they have to fuck everyone who looks at them.

25 min later 5221783 Anonymous
>>5221776 >implying that's not true If most of your worth in the eyes of men revolved around that, you'd keep a pretty tight grip on it as well, wouldn't you?

25 min later 5221787 Anonymous
>>5221772 The lock and key analogy is fucking perfect, I don't see how you can't understand it, and way to not rebut anything...

25 min later 5221789 Anonymous
>>5221780 They don't "have to", but what if they just enjoy doing it? Like another person might enjoy going for a run?

25 min later 5221790 Anonymous
>>5221783 That's what I meant, i typed are instead of aren't

26 min later 5221795 Anonymous
>>5221780 >he doesn't understand why there's something wrong with judging a woman to be a whore Enjoy being a bad person

27 min later 5221799 Anonymous
>>5221772 It's pretty valid actually.

27 min later 5221801 Anonymous
>>5221787 >The lock and key analogy is fucking perfect Not really, no.

27 min later 5221802 Anonymous
>>5221787 Because it reduces a woman's worth to being nothing more than an object.

28 min later 5221808 Anonymous (2459040042_3590fbe0bc.jpg 496x500 162kB)
>>5221576 >Why do you believe that a woman's worth is inversely proportional to the amount of men she has been with? Women generally tend to be the sexual gatekeepers, an average looking woman can walk up to 99% of (straight) males, overtly ask for sex, and they'll agree. By and large women, half-attractive women at least, can fuck as many people as they want. Promiscuity will therefore be frowned upon. However the general perception for men is that they have to use some kind of skill or talent to get women to like them and sleep with them, sleeping with lots of women is seen as an accomplishment. Also theres the evolutionary baggage we carry that a woman has sex and bears children, wheras a man can fuck around if he wants. A man who sleeps with a lot of women would be able to have more offspring, which is a sign of success. It's a kind of metric for success that runs deep, it's primal, evolutionary programming, and has been dominant for millions of years. It isn't going to budge for some fancy new feminist ideas about gender equality. I have slept with a self confessed slut. She once told me that she sometimes used sex because she had low self esteem, and thought that sex was the only way she could feel affection or be wanted by anyone. It was quite sad really. And it turns out she was really fucking crazy. Now I'm sure there are people who are of sound mind and just really love sex and will be promiscuous for that reason, that's fine, but it's probably an exception to the norm. TL;DR: Sluts are sluts. they can open their legs and get as much dick as they want, and they'll probably do it because they have emotional problems.

28 min later 5221814 Anonymous
>>5221802 No, it's an analogous representation of the gender roles in the dating world. Nobody believes females are literally locks.

29 min later 5221817 Anonymous
>>5221802 >your rebuttal My sides have imploded.

30 min later 5221823 Anonymous
>>5221795 >>5221802 Haha, oh females. Surely a man can be judged by only his actions and accomplishments but women can't be, right? How exactly does this reduce a woman's worth to an object? If anything, the same thing could be said about men. Sleeping with a lot of different guys clearly shows a lack of character, you could have sex 4 times a day in a committed relationship, why do you think we don't shame girls who do that?

31 min later 5221827 Anonymous
>>5221814 They are figurative locks.

31 min later 5221835 Anonymous
>>5221814 Well then why would you call a vagina a lock? other than the fact that they are both things shaped to accomodate other specifically shaped things.

35 min later 5221850 Anonymous
>>5221835 Because it's simple and enables a particular ideology. Ideologues like simplifying things.

36 min later 5221853 Anonymous
>>5221835 Because a lock is supposed to keep things out. Similarly, the average woman doesn't just sleep around, she keeps cocks out. When you "unlock" her, you get laid. If women want to sleep around they can, most college age women do and they don't catch any flak for it.

36 min later 5221855 Anonymous
>>5221576 >So please, /r9k/. Remind me why you hate feminism. > Remind me why you keep using words like slut and whore and cum dumpster, when it does nothing to help you or your breed of men. Because you keep using words like virgin or neckbeard or basement-dweller. > Remind me why you continue to slut shame women, when all it results in is less women choosing to have sex with you. It's indifferent if I slut shame some woman or not in their choice to have sex with me. They wouldn't anyway. I slut shame because you virgin shame. > Remind me why it would be a bad thing for women to be more sexually liberated. It isn't per se. Your brand that shames anybody who doesn't have the same sexual lifestyle than you is.

38 min later 5221867 Anonymous
Lol sex positive feminism is a weak offshoot of feminism that doesn't do anything but whine on the Internet about the "all heterosexual intercourse is rape" feminists. Meanwhile those feminists are the ones that fight forever for laws and systems that make men expendable money generators for women that never have to take responsibility for anything in their lives. And even the ones that support actual "sexual liberation" are completely blind to the phenomenon where they refuse to fuck anyone that isn't an unemployed degenerate or a physically abusive ex-con and then wonder where all the good men have gone. Even even with all that you're never getting laid, so whatever you do, don't treat women with respect. That makes you an asshole. Just tell as many women as possible you want your dick inside them, apparently nothing else matters except being forward.

45 min later 5221909 Anonymous
>>5221576 >Why do you believe that a woman's worth is inversely proportional to the amount of men she has been with? Why do you keep asking this question when it has been answered a million times already? >You don't measure up. You are not an alpha male. There is no such thing as an "alpha male." >But you still think you deserve a virgin. So you admit that virginity is a very positive quality in a woman that greatly increases her value. >You men call women sluts for having sex, but it's really only because she won't sleep with you. Except, you know, I'm against promiscuity and have no interest in it. >You feel entitled to her body. I'm not sure I want to have sex even in a relationship. Looks like you failed again. >Your gender created the rules. Biology created the rules. >Remind me why it would be a bad thing for women to be more sexually liberated. They already are, and it's bad thing because it results in more STDs, single mothers and broken homes, and less marriages.

45 min later 5221910 Anonymous
Meh. I once had a beautiful virgin gf, we were both 21. She broke up with me because she didn't want to lose her virginity to me. Years later I'm still bitter about it.

48 min later 5221928 Anonymous
>>5221696 >Yeah because women don't have the privilege of being able to sleep around and be hailed in society for doing so. You should really ask yourself why you want to be hailed for doing something very negative. >Because men decided that women aren't entitled to the same freedoms as men. Men started this. Then why don't you start shaming and rejecting men who sleep around?

56 min later 5221982 Anonymous
"the rules" i.e. the social protocols arose naturally out of the the behavioural predispositions of most of the population. traditional gender dynamics are a natural division of labour between the on-average different mindsets possessed by males and females, and the selection pressures which have existed for nearly all of human history and the behavioural predispositions that still exist within our brains as a consequence. WOMEN shame sluts because they are effectively flooding the market with easy sex. Women don't want to have to compete conventionally by giving out sex as easily, so they naturally try to inhibit slutlike behaviour by shaming and bullying and ostracising sluts. Men on the other hand have similarly rational reason for the predisposition to value female chastity in a long-term partner and avoid female promiscuity in a long term partner. The reason being that a woman is always sure that any child she gives birth to contains her genetic material, whereas a man is not necessarily sure. So unless he tries to make sure of this he could easily end up raising another man's child without ever giving creating one of his own. That's all there is to it. That's why it's natural for human beings to possess those behavioural predispositions. If you want to cry to something, then cry to biology.

58 min later 5221994 Anonymous
>>5221801 yes, really, yes

1 hours later 5222395 Anonymous
It's pretty simple OP, a woman that goes through a multitude of guys in a short span of time is not as attractive to me as a woman that has had fewer partners. If she goes through men really fast that just tells me that she is not the committed type, that she will most likely leave me really quickly and that I will feel like shit at the end. This is the same when applied to males. Why would you choose a partner that is incapable of settling down with you, when you can go for someone that is much more stable? I don't think I deserve anyone, but I do have a right to choose, and a right to say no to someone based on the amount of partners they had.

1 hours later 5222519 Anonymous
>"Having previous sexual partners greatly increased the likelihood that a woman would have a secondary sex partner. In particular, a woman with 4 or more male sex partners prior to her primary relationship was about 8.5 times more likely to have a secondary sex partner than a woman with no previous sex partners." (Forste, Renata and Koray Tanfer. "Sexual Exclusivity among Dating, Cohabiting, and Married Women." Journal of Marriage and the Family 58, no. 1 (1996): 33-47) >"The relationship between virginity status and the risk of divorce remains strong even after differences in family background characteristics are controlled (Models 3 and 6). Surprisingly, once we control for virginity status at marriage, Catholics and fundamentalist Protestants are no different from any other respondents in the probability of divorce." (Kahn, Joan R. and Kathryn A. London. "Premarital Sex and the Risk of Divorce." Journal of Marriage and the Family 53, no. 4 (1991): 845-845.)

2 hours later 5222569 Anonymous
Because everyone here who has ever said that or called anyone a "normalfag" is a bitter virgin who has had so little real world social experience that they have a distorted view of the outside world and think that everyone is out to get them. tl;dr Because /r9k/ is full of betas

2 hours later 5222635 Anonymous
>>5221576 /r9k/ likes long term women because they aren't comfortable approaching women. So they would prefer a world where you only have to do it a few times rather than a lot.

2 hours later 5222904 Anonymous (woman'sworth.png 533x293 13kB)
>>5221576 >inversely proportional >undefined if she is a virgin >not ranging from 0 for slutwhores and tending to infinity for pure virginal waifus

1.823 0.161