4chan archive /r9k/ (index)
similar threads
2012-12-29 06:05 5003646 Anonymous (rip white race.jpg 840x795 113kB)
You know, /r9k/. As much as I dislike your misogyny. Dont ever become like this. Please.

2 min later 5003679 Anonymous
reading that physically pained me

4 min later 5003710 Anonymous
Don't worry. You can single those people out on /r9k/ by the fact that they use tripcodes and post 10-100 replies to every misogyny thread.

5 min later 5003711 Anonymous
*cracks invisible whip*

5 min later 5003716 Anonymous
>filename you just know the fucker is white too, you just know it. Makes me ashamed to be white myself, unfortunately.

8 min later 5003753 Anonymous
That girl just needs a dicking

9 min later 5003759 Anonymous
That guy is the logical completion of the beta thought process. Give them everything, your dignity, your soul, and hope it's enough for something in return. Hail Womyn!

12 min later 5003798 Anonymous
Truly a tragic being

13 min later 5003818 Anonymous
>>5003646 He's sorta right about the war and violence stuff, and it's true that the average man is relatively stupid (compared to average woman). Still, that's no reason to hate yourself.

15 min later 5003842 Anonymous
>>5003818 Men only commit most violence and start most wars because women don't do anything at all. We have nothing to compare it to.

16 min later 5003846 Anonymous
I wish I could transcend the physical plane and become immortal just so I could leave this fucking planet and try to find actually intelligent life somewhere else.

18 min later 5003869 Anonymous
>>5003842 Does it matter why? The fact is that they do.

18 min later 5003873 Anonymous
Do you think he's a virgin? Or just gay?

18 min later 5003874 Anonymous
>>5003818 >the average man is relatively stupid (compared to average woman) [citation needed]

18 min later 5003878 Anonymous
>>5003818 You must be out of your mind. Have you been to a highschool, or any other place of education? Most of the females are fucking cunts who really don't give a shit, and expect to pass because they're female.

19 min later 5003891 Anonymous
>>5003646 Behold, the end product of cultural marxism.

20 min later 5003898 Anonymous
The goodest goyim of all.

21 min later 5003906 Anonymous
>>5003759 Seriously. As a beta, I would rather remain ronery than have whatever gf insane and ugly enough to take radical feminism seriously

22 min later 5003912 Anonymous
>Stormfags on /r9k/ Wow, have we hit a new low?

23 min later 5003922 Anonymous
>>5003912 You do realize the whole Happy Merchant thing is a joke right.

24 min later 5003935 Anonymous (1349390399888.jpg 481x497 160kB)
>>5003912 Defend that status quo, goy. The opinions that the majority hate are the opinions that you should hate - even on an anonymous forum where you will get nothing in return for it. Just practice your adherence to the party line. Cultivate that hatred of unorthodoxy.

24 min later 5003937 Anonymous
>>5003922 You know how jokes start as something funny and then someone takes them seriously? Well, that happened once and you know what happened that fucked the entire history up? Commies.

24 min later 5003939 Anonymous
>>5003818 the average PERSON is stupid. the gender has nothing to do with this.

25 min later 5003943 Anonymous
>>5003922 >imply Jewish control of the media, politics, academia, and finance is a joke

29 min later 5003988 Anonymous
Wow. Thats. Wow.

30 min later 5003999 Anonymous
>>5003988 Are you wowing about those dubs, because you should be. 14/88 for life.

31 min later 5004013 mystery.jpg
>>5003646 I love men. Without men I wouldn't have 4chan or my computer. Thanks, men.

32 min later 5004025 Anonymous (1355544873535.jpg 461x523 58kB)
>>5003999 Thread over. This is stormfag and dubfag territory now.

32 min later 5004028 Anonymous
>>5004013 If you love men so much, why wont you let me fuck you?

32 min later 5004029 Anonymous (snailio-hiding.jpg 600x412 81kB)
>>5003999 my godddddd.... trips

33 min later 5004034 Anonymous
>>5003999 holy shit trips

36 min later 5004074 Anonymous (1356565114850.jpg 373x319 62kB)
>>5004028 Well played anon. Checkmate, mystery.jpg.

36 min later 5004076 Anonymous
Just wanna point out one thing. >womyn I see what they're doing their, removing the innate connection with men and possible subcategory status attributed to females, but "womyn" looks terrible as a word. The guy seems beyond whipped and pretty blind himself, or as he put it "retarded." There is one thing I agree on, and it's that MANY -- not all -- men tend to do terrible things to females. Experience and history show this to be true.

36 min later 5004078 Anonymous
>>5003874 Google studies about iq spread in population, most geniuses and retards are male, the average female is smarter than the average male. Also I think females score higher on emotional intelligence tests. >>5003878 At my high-school, most of the top students were female and I don't remember one of the bad female students complaining that they should get good grades just because of their sex. Your mileage may vary though. >>5003939 Umm, no, the average person is, by definition, neither very smart or very stupid.

37 min later 5004096 Anonymous
>>5004025 Fuck off JIDF, I am Muslim.

38 min later 5004098 Anonymous (1332475213903.png 667x670 429kB)
>>5004025 Yup. it sure is /b in here. could have been a good thread.

38 min later 5004107 Anonymous
Also, inb4 "HURR you typed 'their' instead of 'there.'" I will wipe anyone who posts this off the face of the earth. >trained marine. Al'Qaeda. 100 confirmed kills.etc.jpg

38 min later 5004111 Anonymous
>>5004076 >womyn >I see what they're doing their, removing the innate connection with men and possible subcategory status attributed to females, but "womyn" looks terrible as a word. It's pretty retarded to, since I'm pretty sure 'man' in that context is for the human race, not the male gender.

39 min later 5004121 Anonymous
>>5004078 >iq >emotional intelligence

39 min later 5004126 Anonymous
>>5004078 >I think females score higher on emotional intelligence tests. No fucking way is that correct, not in a fucking lifetime. If that's true then my experience with women is a massive statistical anomaly.

40 min later 5004128 Anonymous
>>5004078 >Google studies >Based on demographic >Which is unbiased because there are far more women than men You're truly embarrassing yourself, I don't think you can go any lower at this po- >At my high-school, most of the top students were female I take my last statement back. You're a retard.

40 min later 5004134 Anonymous
>>5004098 You sound like a race traitor.

41 min later 5004143 Anonymous
>>5003646 You just KNOW she's cheating on him or he's one of those dudes who enjoy getting cuckolded.

42 min later 5004155 Anonymous
>>5004128 thanks. someone had to say it.

42 min later 5004170 Anonymous
>>5004134 I'm a race traitor because I don't like dub threads? what the fuck are you talking about?

44 min later 5004193 Anonymous
I am a male feminist and I want to punch that guy in the face. I strongly suspect that his girlfriend is the type of "radical feminist" who doesn't have any familiarity with feminist theory and just likes to rant about how men are the root of all evil and every aspect of society is carefully crafted to oppress women.

45 min later 5004196 Anonymous
>>5004078 Very few people are average.

45 min later 5004207 Anonymous
>>5004170 Ah nevermind, I thought you were implying the white race isnt supreme. Carry on.

46 min later 5004216 Anonymous
>>5004134 you sound like a /b/tard. Are you going to provide us pics of puppies taking a dick in their ass and out their mouth now or later?

46 min later 5004221 Anonymous
>>5004078 If you don't consider 100 iq retarded, then I'd hate to see what you consider stupid.

48 min later 5004232 Anonymous
>>5004216 You sound like someone who doesnt want to create a bright and healthy future for white children.

49 min later 5004239 Anonymous
>>5004232 you sound like JIDF

50 min later 5004250 Anonymous
Where did the spelling "womyn" come from? That bugs the hell out of me because it looks wrong. My spell check doesn't even recognize it. Are they accidentally misspelling it or something?

50 min later 5004251 Anonymous (1352684234838.png 500x432 233kB)
>>5004232 What he said. Think about the children you hearless swine.

50 min later 5004253 Anonymous
i used to be like that now i just wanna die.

51 min later 5004261 Anonymous
>>5004239 I just googled them, I cant believe this is actually a thing.

51 min later 5004265 Anonymous
>>5004250 English you second language? Womyn is the correct spelling in Britain. Just like tire is tyre here.

52 min later 5004274 Anonymous
>>5004261 >feigning ignorance Yes, yes. Good Goy...

53 min later 5004279 Anonymous
>>5004193 >associating in any way with modern feminism You're hurting your own cause. Find a new name that doesn't cause everyone to immediately associate you with the misandrist radical feminists that seem to be all over mainstream feminism these days. What year did feminism stop fighting for equality and start fighting for power? Can't we just have a human rights group catering to true equality? Affirmative action is fucking stupid. Nobody should get any special considerations, they should just be expected to do a job and whoever is the most capable gets the fucking job. No more of this "I shouldn't be excluded from a certain activity because I'm unable to do it" shit. Step up or go home, dick.

53 min later 5004288 Anonymous
>>5004250 It's so these pretentious bitches wouldn't have the word 'men' in 'women', because that's muh oppression or something idiotic like that. Odd that it's not oppressive for 'he' to be in 'she'.

54 min later 5004295 Anonymous
>>5004250 Women has "men" in it. Feminists want to be separate from men so they replace the e with y. Looks like you have some privilege checking to do.

55 min later 5004313 Anonymous
>>5004288 It is. I once read a butthurt manifest at uni that replaced she with "sxi" to "avoid the use of genres and avoid sexist violence across the campus".

55 min later 5004318 Anonymous
>>5004121 I was talking about both. Do you even reading comprehension? >>5004126 Well I was just stating my opinion. However I'm pretty sure that females are better at "reading" someone's feelings by looking at their face, I remember reading about a study that proved that. >>5004128 Do you even know what an average is? What are you even trying to say, other than insulting me? You're acting like a kid whose feelings got hurt. Get over yourself. >>5004196 About half, actually. >>5004221 100 is just average in the western world.

55 min later 5004322 Anonymous
>>5004279 They angled for power the moment they got the first drop of political meaning. NO political group EVER wants to give up power obtained. Ever.

55 min later 5004323 Anonymous
>>5004250 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Womyn "In Old English sources, the word "man" was gender-neutral, with a meaning similar to the modern English usage of "one" as an indefinite pronoun. The words wer and wyf were used to specify a man or woman where necessary, respectively. Combining them into wer-man or wyf-man expressed the concept of "any man" or "any woman." Over time, wer-man was simplified to man while wyf-man developed into woman.[3][4] Feminist writers have suggested that the less prejudicial usage of the Old English sources reflects more egalitarian notions of gender at the time.[2]" also; >Dark Ages >Egalitarian notions of gender

56 min later 5004331 decapode
>>5004128 1.01 male to 1 female globally. I've never seen a country with more women than men.

56 min later 5004333 Anonymous
>>5004193 I used to think that third wave feminism was better than second wave feminism. But then I realized that even third wave feminism did not give a shit about the average male. According to them, all men are privileged for being men, which is simply misandry by any other means. I used to be a male feminist myself, until I realized feminists did not give a fuck about low status men like me

57 min later 5004352 Anonymous
>>5004193 >doesn't have any familiarity with feminist theory and just likes to rant about how men are the root of all evil and every aspect of society is carefully crafted to oppress women. But that is EXACTLY what feminism is about. Seems like you're the one who doesn't have any familiarity with the subject.

58 min later 5004356 Anonymous
>>5004288 >>5004313 Wow... If that's true, then that's pretty much it. The world is literally over

58 min later 5004364 Anonymous
>>5004274 Silly Jews, its like they're afraid of openly going on the attack on these issues. Probably because they don't want to lose their victim status.

58 min later 5004368 Anonymous
>>5004318 >Do you even know what an average is? What are you even trying to say, other than insulting me? You're acting like a kid whose feelings got hurt. Get over yourself. Average is only fair if it's not unbiased. This isn't a 50/50. Of course there's going to be more "average women" than "average men". And you know what being the best at highschool means? Shit, because you only memorize useless data and most of that will be wiped out of your head in 5 years or less. So stop being such a retard and provide real facts. >>5004318 >100 is just average in the western world. What are you talking about? 75 is the average in western world, 65 being the lowest (And I think that was the US).

59 min later 5004374 Anonymous
>>5004279 Feminism was never about equality. What you're looking for is egualitarianism.

59 min later 5004375 Anonymous
>>5004323 >Feminist writers have suggested that the less prejudicial usage of the Old English sources reflects more egalitarian notions of gender at the time. That's stupid. I'll give it to her that during the Dark Ages women had a lot more freedom than any time before or after (until the last 100 years) but at the same time come on, stop being such a fucking faggot.

59 min later 5004383 Anonymous
>>5004374 Most of the feminist trips on /r9k/ hold that feminism IS egalitarianism and that men interested in equality should be feminists, not masculists. Masculists is nonsensical because feminism already has them covered.

1 hours later 5004392 Anonymous
>>5004368 I thought 75 was legally retarded?

1 hours later 5004405 Anonymous
>>5004352 Let's put it this way. There's a guy who works at researching physics, comes up with experiments for particle accelerators, the works. He runs a blog. There's another guy who read Layman's Guide to Physics and also runs a blog. Which one is the blog of a physicist?

1 hours later 5004406 decapode
>>5004352 Seems like you've never read feminist literature The SCUM manifesto doesn't count. >>5004383 No. Masculinism is great as it relieves the pressure on feminist to cater to men. Masculinists are better representatives than feminists. Men and women find common ground in the fact that their roblems stem from the same thing. >>5004392 the IQ scale is adjusted so that 100 remains the average on a yearly basis, I think.

1 hours later 5004413 Anonymous
>>5004392 it is, but don't tell the retard that

1 hours later 5004430 Anonymous
>>5004405 What does this have to do with anything? Every feminist hates men and thinks society is precision engineered to oppress women.

1 hours later 5004446 Anonymous
>>5003646 Reading that almost gave me a stomach ulcer. Fuck.

1 hours later 5004470 Anonymous (1354989832635.jpg 640x480 39kB)
>IQ >Relevant This is what dumb people believe.

1 hours later 5004521 Anonymous
>>5004470 This. I have an IQ of 136 and I'm a fucking high school drop out. Your potential for learning doesn't mean shit when you have no desire to learn.

1 hours later 5004557 Anonymous
>>5004521 >thinking IQ is potential for learning Lol I see why the fuck you dropped out. I have the same IQ as you, and I'm a fat fuck and I still managed to make it through college at the least doing the minimum.

1 hours later 5004565 Anonymous
>>5004368 >Average is only fair if it's not unbiased. This isn't a 50/50. Of course there's going to be more "average women" than "average men". That doesn't make sense, are you trying to troll me brah? >And you know what being the best at highschool means? Shit, because you only memorize useless data and most of that will be wiped out of your head in 5 years or less. So stop being such a retard and provide real facts. I never said it mattered (although it does, but that's besides the point now). Some guy said "waah females get higher grades because vagina" and I said that wasn't the case at my school. Simple enough for you? >What are you talking about? 75 is the average in western world, 65 being the lowest (And I think that was the US). I was talking about average iq, 75 would be considered retarded in Europe or the USA.

1 hours later 5004586 Anonymous
What a pathetic specimen of a man. Actually no, what a pathetic specimen of a human being. Nobody, man or woman, should ever be such a simpering, spineless, coward who apologizes for everything. Nobody.

1 hours later 5004600 Anonymous
>>5004521 Just because a high iq doesn't automatically make you successful, it doesn't mean it's irrelevant. Are you sure your iq is 136? That was one of the dumbest posts in this thread. >saying "this" Actually the dumbest bar none.

1 hours later 5004611 Anonymous
>>5004557 WELL I HAVE AN EVEN HIGHER IQ THAN YOU BUT IM BARELY PASSING UNIVERSITY AND I HAVE EVEN LESS ATTENDANCE THAN YOU COULD IMAGINE your move.

1 hours later 5004622 Anonymous
His vagina should grow in any day now. White people. Damn. #smh

1 hours later 5004641 Anonymous
>>5004406 >Masculinists are better representatives than feminists. Men and women find common ground in the fact that their roblems stem from the same thing. Yet you bitch when they complain about the friendzone, or call to attention that men need sexual intimacy

1 hours later 5004656 Anonymous
>>5004600 That was the fucking point faggot. I'm saying that without motivation, without the desire to learn or the pressure to succeed then your IQ doesn't mean shit to how successful you'll be. Sure it helps but if you're not willing to put in the effort then you're not getting anywhere. >>5004557 IQ is quite literally your intelligence quota you retarded fuck.

1 hours later 5004659 Anonymous
>>5004279 There are some crazy radfems out there, sure, but they don't in any way represent mainstream feminism. They're the only ones that get mentioned on /r9k/ because they allow /r9k/ to maintain its warped view of feminism, but they're not taken seriously in a lot of feminist circles. Now more than ever, feminism is fighting for true equality. Most feminist schools have taken on various other causes (anti-racism, LGBT rights, etc) and incorporated them into larger theories of power and oppression in an attempt to see how we can achieve true equality for all people. >>5004352 It's what radical feminism is about. I agree that radical feminism is stupid. So do most of the feminists I know. In fact, many feminists really hate radfems because their crazy bullshit does nothing to improve the situation for women and just gives anti-feminists more ammunition. >>5004374 >egualitarianism Not only did you spell the word wrong, but it's not a thing. There has never been an activist movement called egalitarianism. It's just some bullshit made up by "men's rights" assholes over on Reddit so that they can pretend they're not just anti-feminists who want women to shut up and do what they're told. And yes, most feminists do want equality. Feminism is just a desire for gender equality combined with the recognition that society systematically mistreats and diminishes women.

1 hours later 5004672 decapode
>>5004641 I find it very suspicious that guys are hurt when they get angry at someone for not loving them. I don't find it suspicious that their feelings are hurt, or that they're let down. Every case by the cause, not the type of case.

1 hours later 5004720 Anonymous
>>5004659 >Not only did you spell the word wrong, but it's not a thing. There has never been an activist movement called egalitarianism. It's just some bullshit made up by "men's rights" assholes over on Reddit so that they can pretend they're not just anti-feminists who want women to shut up and do what they're told. jesus christ. you are so stupid

1 hours later 5004735 Anonymous
>>5004659 >And yes, most feminists do want equality. Feminism is just a desire for gender equality combined with the recognition that society systematically mistreats and diminishes women. I know this is what feminism is supposed to be about, but honestly I see very little proof of this. Really, the only proof I've seen of this is some Man Massage event thing held by the college's women center followed by some sort of discussion. >>5004672 I'm a bit confused by what you're trying to say here.

1 hours later 5004738 Anonymous
>>5004659 >Egalitarianism only exists insofar as "men's rights" assholes can pretend they're not anti-feminists who just want women to get back in the kitchen. Wow. It's every single feminist who has ever posted on /r9k/ in one line.

1 hours later 5004741 Anonymous
>>5004656 >>5004557 >>5004521 lol @ you morons thinking iq even means anything.

1 hours later 5004754 Anonymous
>>5004641 >you bitch when they complain about the friendzone The whole concept of the friendzone is complete bullshit. It's based on a complete misunderstanding of human interactions, and it basically boils down to the idea that women are automatic sex dispensers who will fuck you if you can just find the right combination of inputs. Not all women are going to want to have sex with you, even if they like you enough to be your friend. If you can't handle this, don't be friends with them. The only person keeping you in the friendzone is yourself. If you have sexual needs, you figure out how you're going to fulfill them; you can't expect some woman to do it for you just because you're a nice guy and you held the door open for her that one time. >men need sexual intimacy You know what's a good way for men to get the sexual intimacy that they "need"? Not stigmatizing women who enjoy sex as sluts. This is exactly what the guy you responded to was saying: patriarchal norms are bad for everyone (except perhaps rapists and men who think that women should be their property).

1 hours later 5004757 Anonymous
>>5004659 >Not only did you spell the word wrong, but it's not a thing. There has never been an activist movement called egalitarianism. It's just some bullshit made up by "men's rights" assholes over on Reddit so that they can pretend they're not just anti-feminists who want women to shut up and do what they're told. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egalitarianism I agree with everything else you said, but that part just isn't true. OWS was supposedly an egalitarian movement. There are plenty of other examples. Just because you're too lazy or ignorant to look for the truth, that doesn't mean it isn't there.

1 hours later 5004759 Anonymous
>>5004735 That's because it's a shifting goalpost. Once you hammer home what feminism truly represents, some dumb entitled cunt or whiteknight runs along and screams 'nuh-uh, thats not REAL feminism!'. It's a daily game of No True Scotsman.

1 hours later 5004765 Anonymous
>>5004641 Everyone hates the faggots whining about friendzones, even masculists.

1 hours later 5004774 Anonymous
>>5004659 >There are some crazy radfems out there, sure, but they don't in any way represent mainstream feminism. They do. You just don't realize it because there's an enormous gap between your self-image and what you really believe. You might think of yourself as someone who believes in equality, but then you'll say things that are blatantly anti-equality. Your cognitive dissonance prevents you from realizing the conflict, whereas non-feminists clearly see that you are no friend of equality. And then you'll say something like: "No dude, those are the RADICAL feminists, I'm one of the mainstream ones who believes in equality!"

1 hours later 5004780 Anonymous
>>5004754 >The whole concept of the friendzone is complete bullshit. It's based on a complete misunderstanding of human interactions, and it basically boils down to the idea that women are automatic sex dispensers who will fuck you if you can just find the right combination of inputs. wat "Friendzone" is a modern term for unrequited love.

1 hours later 5004784 Anonymous
>>5004754 I was with you until you said "patriarchy" Also I don't really like people that sleep around of either gender so there's that too.

1 hours later 5004788 Anonymous
>>5004078 >emotional intelligence HAAGU890DFGJ8I0DGFAHU90ADGFHUODGFJLOJLOAGFDHJOGHJOGDHJUOHJO

1 hours later 5004794 Anonymous
>>5004720 >>5004738 Egalitarianism, as a concept, is a component of feminism and all other rights movements, but there is no movement called egalitarianism. People who say that we should all just be egalitarians are effectively saying that we should preserve the status quo and not talk about the fact that maybe there are certain groups that society continually shits on and that if we want equality we need to fight for the status of these groups and not just say some nice words now and then about how everyone is equal.

1 hours later 5004796 Anonymous
>>5004754 >You know what's a good way for men to get the sexual intimacy that they "need"? Not stigmatizing women who enjoy sex as sluts. In other words: lower your standards. Lower them until they hit rock bottom.

1 hours later 5004803 Anonymous
I checked my privilege now you check these numbers

1 hours later 5004806 critic
>>5003646 that really fucking rustled my jimmies i really am fucking raging

1 hours later 5004807 Anonymous
>>5004803 sick numbers bro

1 hours later 5004809 Anonymous
Yeah, well I hate men who focus on the ultra rare occurrences, then stereotype their entire gender based upon such grossly misleading bullshit and THEN in order to appeal to some sort of bullshit gynarchy hivemind to prove he's such an understanding and thuper duper non-sexist for real guy, he wallows in self pity and shame.

1 hours later 5004818 Anonymous
>>5004754 lol obvious tumblr feminist is obvious

1 hours later 5004826 Anonymous
>>5004659 >>5004754 This is either a very dedicated troll or the craziest feminist poster on 4chan at the moment.

1 hours later 5004829 Anonymous
>his face when she uses all his money to go out and get regular rough dickings by muscled, misogynistic alphas

1 hours later 5004833 Anonymous
>>5004794 egalitarianism is still a thing, and it's what "HURR TRU FEMINISTS" claim to be, only they insist that its feminism. its either they fight for women's rights, regardless of equality, and its feminism, or they fight for equal rights for both sexes and they are an egalitarian. calling egalitarianism some sort of made up shit by MRA's is fucking stupid. like easily one of the dumbest things i've read all day

1 hours later 5004839 Anonymous
>>5004796 If your standards include "doesn't enjoy sex" then yes, maybe you should get rid of that one. One of the many ridiculous contradictions that /r9k/ has regarding women is that they're frigid bitches who reject men for fun and simultaneously they're hypergamous sluts who fuck as many men as they possibly can. If you're going to insist that women fulfill your sexual needs, you might have to let go of your obsession with sexual purity.

1 hours later 5004867 Anonymous
>>5004839 Nevermind, I misread your post.

1 hours later 5004871 Anonymous
>>5004788 Why the rage? Did you seriously think only one kind of intelligence exists?

1 hours later 5004883 Anonymous
>>5004833 Alright then, point me to the egalitarian activists. Do they have any websites? Publications? Events? As I keep saying: yes, egalitarianism exists as a concept. It's part of feminism. Feminism is an activist movement, which egalitarianism is not and has never been. The fiction created by MRAs is not the concept of egalitarianism but the idea that someone can be an "egalitarian" and be fighting for a cause rather than just sitting around saying that we should all just get along.

1 hours later 5004891 Anonymous
>>5004839 >they're frigid bitches who reject men for fun and simultaneously they're hypergamous sluts who fuck as many men as they possibly can that's not a contradiction. because of their hypergamy, their standards are inflated beyond all reason. thus, the majority of men who approach them are below their standards. thanks to the immense amount of attention women get from men, this is possible while still fucking whenever they feel like it.

1 hours later 5004904 Anonymous
>>5004883 >As I keep saying: yes, egalitarianism exists as a concept. It's part of feminism. You mean it overlaps with it. There's plenty of feminism that isn't compatible with it in the least.

1 hours later 5004909 decapode
>>5004904 What feminism do you speak of?

1 hours later 5004913 Anonymous
>>5004891 so uh do you have any actual evidence for this because it kind of sounds like you're basing this on that one time when you went to a club and were scandalized by the indecent attire

1 hours later 5004916 Anonymous
>>5004883 i would call them normal every day sane people, or feminists that are mislabeling themselves. that's the whole fucking point man. >egalitarianism exists as a concept. It's part of feminism no, it isnt

1 hours later 5004926 Anonymous
>>5004839 Not the guy you are talking to, but I personally would love to marry a slut. Still, I am forever alone. Additionally, a woman can enjoy sex and not being a slut. I hate it when feminists equate sluts with women in general. Feminism leads guys to be friendzoned, as what feminist men think what women want for a lover is the same stuff they want in a friend. Feminists have no sympathy for men who are involuntarily celibate.

1 hours later 5004933 Anonymous
>>5004883 If egalitarianism is a part of feminism, why have I never seen any feminists who believe in egalitarianism?

1 hours later 5004940 Anonymous
>feminism is about equality and yet it has fought for rampant inequality, commonly dismisses evidence that disproves its ridiculous points wrong, ignores the issues of men even when systemic misandry is evident throughout state institutions, demonizes men as the sole proprietors of oppression, ETC ETC ETC. and this isn't just radical feminism here. most feminists don't want to castrate whatever man disagrees with them, but the vast majority of feminists who i've talked to in real life and on the internet--not to mention the feminists who wield power in state institutions--see men as their natural enemy deserving no respect and possessing no humanity. the concepts of privilege and the patriarchy engender inequality on their own--it's no surprise that feminists take it all too far.

1 hours later 5004963 Anonymous
>>5004933 Have you ever actually talked to a feminist? I find that helps quite a bit when trying to figure out what feminists believe. People say all sorts of crazy shit on the internet, mostly for attention of because they have no idea what they're talking about. Having a conversation with a feminist is a great way to understand what the movement is really about.

1 hours later 5004965 Anonymous
>>5004913 if my experience doesn't match up with yours that's one thing, but seeing as how your dismissal of it is based in bullshit ad hominem (lel you're just a mad virgin neckbeard XD) you can kindly shove your tumblr-level faggotry up your ass.

1 hours later 5004968 Anonymous
>>5004913 It is well known that sluts are really shallow and only go for football players and the like. You never hear sluts fucking legions of lonely men, whereas they would happily fuck legions of alpha men.. >>5004916 You should know that third wave feminism (eg modern mainstream feminism) does not explicitly hate men. However, they maintain men are privileged and entitled, thereby overlooking the suffering that men actually face

1 hours later 5004979 Anonymous
>>5004963 Not the person you a replying to, but many feminists, like Amanda Marcotte, are absolutely unsympathetic to the problems facing men.

1 hours later 5004999 Anonymous
>>5004933 Feminism originated with the idea that men and women should be treated equally. At least in the West, that idea has become so widely accepted that almost no one bothers to label it feminism anymore. That leaves mostly idiots on tumblr claiming the label to make their hatred of men seem legitimate.

1 hours later 5005003 Anonymous
>>5004963 >Have you ever actually talked to a feminist? i live in toronto. where that whole slutwalk thing started. i know feminists quite well, and so does everyone here. the only feminists that have any quality of character destroy their potential to not be shitty human beings by defending all of feminism's assorted horseshit as "JUST ABOUT EQUALITY"

1 hours later 5005015 Anonymous
>>5004963 >Have you ever actually talked to a feminist? Loads of them. But as I posted earlier (in response to "radical feminists" not representing "mainstream feminists": 'They do. You just don't realize it because there's an enormous gap between your self-image and what you really believe. You might think of yourself as someone who believes in equality, but then you'll say things that are blatantly anti-equality. Your cognitive dissonance prevents you from realizing the conflict, whereas non-feminists clearly see that you are no friend of equality. And then you'll say something like: "No dude, those are the RADICAL feminists, I'm one of the mainstream ones who believes in equality!"'

1 hours later 5005016 Anonymous
>>5005003 slutwalks started off in some scandi cuntry man.

1 hours later 5005035 Anonymous
>>5005016 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SlutWalk >The SlutWalk protest marches began on April 3, 2011, in Toronto, Canada

1 hours later 5005038 Anonymous
>>5004965 I'm not talking about your experience or my experience. You're making claims about large-scale social trends. I'm asking if you have any data to back it up other than your own personal experience. >>5004968 >It is well known Anecdotes it is, then! >However, they maintain men are privileged and entitled, thereby overlooking the suffering that men actually face Male privilege doesn't mean that all men have easy lives, or that all men are better off than all women. Lots of men suffer; many of them suffer because of gender policing and other patriarchal bullshit that feminism is fighting against. The basic ideal behind male privilege is that, in the vast majority of situations, a person in that situation is better off if they are a man than if they are a woman.

1 hours later 5005052 Anonymous (menz.jpg 400x400 101kB)
ITT: WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ?!?!?! In b4: "derp we should appeal more to men". With allies like these, who needs enemies?

1 hours later 5005055 Anonymous
>>5004078 10/10 nurds trolled i upset

1 hours later 5005059 Anonymous
>>5004963 yeah, and unlike what seems to be propagated here, any person i've met in real life that claims to be a feminist is full of the absurd complaints that tumblr and radical feminists are such a fan of. it seems 'true feminists' are not only the non-vocal part of the group, but are in the minority

1 hours later 5005072 Anonymous
>>5005038 > in the vast majority of situations, a person in that situation is better off if they are a man than if they are a woman. unless that situation is being under the boot of the state, or being at war, or being the target of most violent crime, or being society's object of derision, disgust, and fear, or facing just as much gendered violence (domestic and sexual) but having the statistics that prove so dismissed by crazy cunts shouting about privilege...

1 hours later 5005085 Anonymous
>>5004968 >It is well known that sluts are really shallow and only go for football players and the like This. I pity the "betas" and "omegas" that believed higher rates of promiscuity among women would make them more likely to get laid, when women are really just fucking different alphas. Look at it this way: If you could have sex with ANY woman you saw within 24 hours, would you be banging every fat hambeast and old hag as much as you would overly-developed teens and models? No. And the same goes for sluts - why fuck some beta schlub when you could be getting railed by a D-grade celebrity or "up and coming" sports player?

2 hours later 5005089 Anonymous
>>5003939 I was expecting somebody to correct you on the difference between sex and gender because it's feeling awfully tumblr in this thread. Also, op's picture has all my jimmies for the night. All of them.

2 hours later 5005102 Anonymous (gay tailspin.jpg 659x569 75kB)
>>5003999 OMG TRIPS INB4 SHITSTORM GAISE

2 hours later 5005114 Anonymous
>>5005038 >Anecdotes it is, then! Do you know any non-fat slut who would happily have sex with unattractive men? >The basic ideal behind male privilege is that, in the vast majority of situations, a person in that situation is better off if they are a man than if they are a woman. Which is why men make for the majority of war casualties, prison population, and suicides.

2 hours later 5005127 Anonymous
>>5005052 Since only women's suffering needs to be addressed

2 hours later 5005147 Anonymous
>>5005038 >Male privilege doesn't mean that all men have easy lives, or that all men are better off than all women. Lots of men suffer; many of them suffer because of gender policing and other patriarchal bullshit that feminism is fighting against. Right. "Gender policing." Not unemployment, alcoholism, homelessness, incarceration, workplace fatalities, and other metrics by which men are doing worse than women. And naturally, there is never such a thing as "female privilege," because women have no advantages whatsoever over men. Feminists may sometimes qualify "male privilege" with "not all men are privileged," bu the assumption is that if you're a white heterosexual man you are automatically and forever "privileged," which is the feminist equivalent of original sin and can only be purged by acting like the guy in OP's pic. As for "gender policing," it's not a result of "patriarchy," it's a result of biology. Male and female gender roles have been roughly the same in all places at all times. Women gender police as much as men do.

2 hours later 5005157 Anonymous
>>5005127 Imagine the abolitionist movement if you fucks were around back then: "Baww what about the slaveholders? They are expected to manage this big planatation on their own!!" Labor movement: "Baww what about big business?!?! Its tough out there for a labor management!!!" Civil rights: "Baww what about whitey???? We are expected to do better in school also where's our white pride month?!?!" Gay rights: "Bawww what about straight people?!?!?! Oh the burdens of being expected to get married!!!!" No. Nope. Fuck you. Complaining about the menz is like whining about a papercut when your sister has her whole leg cut off. Equality for men will come around when there is true equality for women.

2 hours later 5005181 Anonymous
>>5005157 So men are equal to slave owners and big business. >Complaining about the menz is like whining about a papercut when your sister has her whole leg cut off You have no knowledge of the suffering that many men go through. >Equality for men will come around when there is true equality for women. Judging from your tone, I dont think so

2 hours later 5005187 Anonymous
>>5005157 >white women actually think that they're in any way comparable to black slaves, gilded age labourers and blacks/homosexuals before the 60s THIS IS WHAT WHITE WOMEN ACTUALLY BELIEVE

2 hours later 5005198 Anonymous
>>5005052 How crazy of them, thinking you hate them and refusing to support your asses just because you keep ranting about how much you hate them.

2 hours later 5005226 Anonymous
>>5005157 >Equality for men will come around when there is true equality for women. Which is why you keep digging up ever more petty shit to excuse being absolute bastards to men, while ignoring the very real shit they're saddled with.

2 hours later 5005255 Anonymous
>>5005187 This. Those who complain about privilege are often privileged themselves. Liberalism is mostly a middle class white phenomenon (think SWPL) Hey feminists, when is the last time you checked your privilege?

2 hours later 5005258 Anonymous
>>5005157 > Equality for men will come around when there is true equality for women. Couple of problems here. 1. When you really get down to it, equality is a pipe dream. It doesn't exist because it can't exist for the simple reason that men and women are fundamentally different. 2. The feminist definition of equality is not "equal opportunity" or something like that. It's "equal outcomes," and even then they only care if the equal outcome in question benefits them (50 % female CEOs? Yes please! 50 % female loggers and fishers? No thank you!).

2 hours later 5005528 Anonymous
>>5004656 >IQ is quite literally your intelligence quota you retarded fuck. Because your intelligence can be summed up by a single test that takes at most an hour or two. Right.

2 hours later 5005656 Anonymous
>>5005255 See, it's shit like this that makes it painfully obvious that you've never bothered to engage with any actual feminists. Mainstream feminism used to focus on the issues face my white middle class women, but that's changed in the last few decades. Today, feminists spend tons of time talking about the privileges associated with race and socioeconomic status and how they intersect with gender issues.

2 hours later 5005722 Anonymous (1353693986083.png 640x480 420kB)
Men and Women should have legal equality but social equality will probably never happen. I'm sort of okay with that.

2 hours later 5005742 Anonymous
>>5004659 >There are some crazy radfems out there, sure, but they don't in any way represent mainstream feminism. They're the only ones that get mentioned on /r9k/ because they allow /r9k/ to maintain its warped view of feminism, but they're not taken seriously in a lot of feminist circles. what is tumblr what is kotaku what is jezebel what is feminist frequency what is goddamn near every fucking website on the planet you dumb fucking retard

2 hours later 5005743 Anonymous
>>5005656 >Today, feminists spend tons of time talking about the privileges associated with race and socioeconomic status and how they intersect with gender issues Now if only they could find a way of doing that without giving away the fact that they spend all their time scribbling down half-baked theories in academic ivory towers and have no interaction with the real world.

3 hours later 5005776 Anonymous
>>5004757 wish someone would post the video of the OWS people and their "progressive stacks" where white men are last in line to speak and then some dude says "i thought this was an egalitarian movement" and everyone there stands there silently like they dont know what egalitarianism is

3 hours later 5005787 Anonymous
>>5005656 >See, it's shit like this that makes it painfully obvious that you've never bothered to engage with any actual feminists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

3 hours later 5005849 Anonymous (1354888323545.jpg 500x350 104kB)
Who really gives a crap about "nice" feminists when the radicals have the political power and are affecting legislation.

3 hours later 5005861 Anonymous
>>5005787 It's funny how every single feminist always says the same thing. Just where the fuck are the "actual" feminists supposed to be?

3 hours later 5005870 Anonymous
Does sucking up and being beta to feminists actually get you laid?

3 hours later 5005884 Anonymous
>>5005861 On the tumblr, of course. Talking about the evils of white cis men and "privlages" (something that every human being has and is stupid to complain about)

3 hours later 5005901 Anonymous
>>5005870 I have found being a decent person to be fairly effective

3 hours later 5005924 Anonymous (checkem.png 800x670 32kB)
check yer privlege everyone

3 hours later 5005928 Anonymous
>>5005870 No, because they think that being nice to them is the creepiest, most vagina-drying experience known to man or god. You're more likely to get laid walking into the headquarters of Jezebel.com and asking which of those cute little cupcakes wants to come home, cook you a dinner, and give you a blowjob.

3 hours later 5005944 Anonymous
>>5005656 Note that I am a former male feminist. The problem with intersectionality is that is assumes that male privilege is as real as actual privileges (such as class, ability, looks, etc). Additionally, many women of color who would otherwise be feminists often refer to themselves as womenists or egalitarians, as they hate white Western women telling them how to properly be liberated

3 hours later 5005966 Anonymous
>>5005901 >implying I bet you think nice guys are the real assholes too

3 hours later 5005978 Anonymous
>>5005944 There is no such thing as people of color.

3 hours later 5006025 Anonymous
>>5005966 anyone who feels the need to point out their niceness, rather than just acting nice and letting people figure it out for themselves, is probably an asshole

3 hours later 5006080 Anonymous
>>5006025 Nice excuse. Hint: Most people who refer to themselves as 'nice guys' do so because they've been told repeatedly by female 'friends' how nice they are. It's not like the internet got together one day and said 'hey, we need a name for ourselves!'. But keep rationalizing. Your ability to dodge logic is astounding.

3 hours later 5006115 Anonymous
>>5005978 Yes there is. Everyone who isn't white, because white isn't a color and if you think it is you are a racist piece of cis-scumbag shit, check your fucking privilege.

3 hours later 5006150 Anonymous
>>5006025 How so? I see more as social awkwardness to the point to where you act like a robot who does favors and not a person. Like, you know how betas never flirt or tease with a girl they like out of the fear of offending them? An exaggerated version of that would be "Nice Guys."

3 hours later 5006244 Anonymous
>>5006025 In a way I agree, but more on the point of humility than an attack on nice guys. I do find self professed 'nice guys' really deserve the quotes because they aren't nice guys at all, just posers with a chip on their shoulder looking for an excuse for some reason or another.

3 hours later 5006284 Anonymous (rapeposter.jpg 1034x1462 515kB)
99% OF RAPISTS ARE MEN U CISSCUM

4 hours later 5006690 Anonymous
Post more pics of dumb feminists.

12 hours later 5009929 Anonymous (stopposting.jpg 630x473 48kB)
>>5004871 Seriously. Stop.

12 hours later 5010046 Anonymous
>>5003646 what the hell happened to him how old is he what the fuck is he going to look like when he grows up

12 hours later 5010120 dudebro
>this kind of 'feminism' >relevant outside the internet >almost 2013 I mean that guys a dumbass no doubt but lets try and keep things in perspective

12 hours later 5010152 Anonymous
god what are these people doing what happens when some young boy runs across this shit what is that going to do to his fucking self-image what the fuck, over

12 hours later 5010158 Anonymous
>>5010120 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3JInPCnhyM please watch this

1.656 0.224