4chan archive /r9k/ (index)
similar threads
2012-09-06 12:01 3674465 Anonymous (Sluttastic.jpg 121x189 12kB)
What does /r9k/ think of Sandra Fluke? She basically wants tax payers to fund women to fuck more guys.

4 min later 3674500 Anonymous
Sounds like a good idea maybe then I will finally have sex.

4 min later 3674505 Anonymous
It's about time the gov't helps me get a gf

5 min later 3674507 Anonymous
Rush?

5 min later 3674510 Anonymous
> Not sure who this is. > Wikipedia her. > See "Woman's Activist." Fuck, here we go. > Argues I should pay for her birth control. No. Opinion: I'm not giving her anything for free when I don't get anything for free. That's equality.

6 min later 3674521 Anonymous
Sounds good to me, you're going to need to use harsher rhetoric if you want to make me hate her without considering her policies.

6 min later 3674524 Anonymous
>>3674510 Since you don't use anything payed for by taxes right?

8 min later 3674536 Anonymous
>>3674510 Does America not have youth centres that hand out condoms? As in "goes on your peen" condoms? For men? The non-diaphragm variety?

9 min later 3674556 Anonymous
>>3674524 No and being on less than $20,000 a year makes me hate poor people such as myself those selfish bastards scumming off of the wealthiest Americans fuck women and minorities

10 min later 3674573 Anonymous
As if all our women weren't slutty enough, now she wants them to literally become whores. Fuck this gay nation.

12 min later 3674578 Anonymous
>>3674536 We do. >>3674524 This is a female specific legislation. ANOTHER one, actually. One of many. Make it both ways, then we'll talk.

13 min later 3674588 Anonymous
>>3674556 American politics is such a joke I can't tell what you're trying to make fun of or be serious about.

13 min later 3674595 Anonymous
I wish she were my gf pls

14 min later 3674598 Anonymous
>>3674578 You just replied to a post pointing out men can already get free condoms so wouldn't it be """"""""equality"""""""&q uot;" if women can get free pills or whatever this woman is campaigning for?

15 min later 3674602 Anonymous
>>3674578 Bringing needless children into the world is not female specific retard. Don't you know how babies are made?

16 min later 3674612 Anonymous
>>3674573 For real, fuck gays they're all homo and shit liking men. That just makes me so grumpy. It's destroying America, seriously. All those kids I have to explain what love is to. Can't handle that. And they like wee wees in their bums. How gross is that? Man, women having sex is gross. Fuck that entire second wave of feminism. And fuck the first wave. Fuck women in general, who needs them? They're all sluts and whores having sex. Those gross sex havers. Then they destroy America by tearing families apart and turn children against hard working male fathers who have strong American penises. I hate that women dress up like whores which is entirely their own fault. The media's not to blame for convincing women that the only way to be pretty is to act slutty. There are no women who reject that regardless. They're all sluts wearing make-up and having sex. Gross.

20 min later 3674644 Anonymous
>>3674465 >She basically wants tax payers to fund women to fuck more guys. So, she's a typical woman?

20 min later 3674645 Anonymous
>>3674588 Poe's law. I was being ironic, friend. >>3674578 Are these state funded youth centres? Because then you're paying for male birth control. You're getting for free something that she is. That's equality.

26 min later 3674685 Anonymous
>Use tax money to be whores Wait .... how is this productive in improving the image of women? Anyways religion won't allow it. Christianity per say won't allow it. Hopefully this leads to feminism against religion considering the old testament is more male oriented. Next we know women will be re writing history because it oppresses them. This is the future of feminism.

30 min later 3674730 Anonymous
"Birth control" is more than just getting rid of unwanted foetuses (which will lead to more welfare costs). Birth control pills reduce the chances of other medicinal costs. OP would know this if he knew anything about vaginas, but he is a republican piece of white trash so he only fucks his male cousins.

32 min later 3674744 Anonymous
>>3674685 No. And don't bring religion into this, it only distracts from the issue at hand. The issue here is that you're somehow convinced that any woman who has sex or wears make-up is an evil slut. What happened in your life that made you dislike women? You're a child of divorce, I take it.

33 min later 3674751 Anonymous
Insurance covers Viagra, at least a lot of them do. Consider this when debating.

36 min later 3674773 Anonymous
>>3674751 Condoms for men, too. People are reacting like this is state funded high heels and make-up. >but thats the next step guys seriously >just you wait women are slowly destroying the world

36 min later 3674778 Anonymous
>>3674744 >>3674744 You must be pretty ignorant to say religion has nothing to do with birth control. For the most part that entire post was a joke because feminazis rant and rave about everything oppressing them. Way to be an autistic woman.

38 min later 3674790 Anonymous
>>3674730 Birth control? What, you want to kill more babies? Life begins at conception and we're stopping the uteri from doing their job and making more proud right wing American children

42 min later 3674818 Anonymous
>>3674573 plan parenthood is a program used to help single and poor mothers, they don't even give out condoms there. That's just what Fawks wants you to believe. They actually provide sonograms and any other medical stuff to help a woman have a healthy pregnancy. The only controversial thing they do is provide abortions for women who might die if they give birth. lrn 2 reed or go back to >>>/pol/

43 min later 3674835 Anonymous
>>3674778 >Person disagrees with me >Must be a woman You tried so hard and got so far but, in the end, it doesn't even matter. Nobody seems to be addressing the point about state funded condoms or insurance covering Viagra but there sure is a lot of rhetoric about how female historians are going to censor history and the bible and shit. Bringing religion into the 'discussion' is only going to end in more tangents that get nowhere Basically, you're not going to change your mind about this regardless of what anyone says in an anonymous thread on the internet that will be dead in a few hours. You shouldn't expect anyone else to change their mind, either. So what's the point of this? Why post here instead of on /pol/?

47 min later 3674867 Anonymous
>>3674818 WHAT? THEY'RE KILLING BABIES IF THE BABIES WILL KILL THE MOTHERS INSTEAD? FUCK THIS GAY NATION WE NEED MORE ORPHANS OR SINGLE FATHERS WHO CAN'T WORK FULL TIME THINK ABOUT IT. WHAT'S MORE FINANCIALLY DETRIMENTAL OVER TIME? $550 FOR AN ABORTION OR $320ish A MONTH FOR EIGHTEEN YEARS?

50 min later 3674910 Anonymous
I would totally support Sandra Fluke personally robbing every last one of you pathetic whining faggots and using the cash to fund nightly sexcapades with alpha jocks, who in the end are far more worthwhile people than the scum here. You may think I'm trolling, and I am, but I also genuinely believe this.

56 min later 3674971 Anonymous
>>3674910 Good thing I have no money.

57 min later 3674985 Anonymous
>>3674465 >She basically wants tax payers to fund All taxation is literally theft. Therefore I disagree with her but i would probably fuck her

59 min later 3675007 Anonymous
I think the idea is great. So many people are so big on being petty Nothing makes me more enthusiastic than the idea that for only a couple hundred bucks a year, we could stop this woman from ever having kids. It sounds like a big deal, but imagine how much the taxpayer would actually have to pay in social programs to support that kid. Hell, I would gladly get tax payers to sterilize her. This is only a very cheap and somewhat temporary form of that.

1 hours later 3675025 Viking
>>3674465 >Protestant There's your problem, she's a heathen.

1 hours later 3675056 Anonymous
Paying for birth control is cheaper than paying for crack babbys. Free birth control for all men and women from high school to college. Free birth control for everyone on welfare.

1 hours later 3675064 Anonymous
>>3674465 I hate her. If women are going broke from beings sluts then they should stop being sluts.

1 hours later 3675080 Anonymous
>>3675056 Also, complete legalization of abortions, and subsidies to put abortion hospitals in lower-income areas. As well, mandatory abortions for all women on welfare.

1 hours later 3675122 Anonymous
Well, I sort of agree with her. I mean, the really poor are going to have sex, that's just fact. When you're living in poverty, you can't afford to do anything fun, really. So what do you do? You have sex. It's free and it's awesome. But if you don't have any sort of contraception or anything, it has a high probability of leading to pregnancy, and when babies are born into poverty, they tend to stay in poverty. And then those poor ass welfare kids end up growing up, and since they can't afford to go to the movies or whatever 15 year olds do these days, they have unprotected sex. Vicious cycle of poverty, but that's just how it is. Now, isn't it cheaper to pay for a few condoms or birth control pills every now and then, than to pay welfare for an entire lifetime?

1 hours later 3675133 Anonymous
>>3675080 See, this bullshit is what annoys me. >try and give people choice on a topic >ah you're trying to force everyone to be gay and aborting and crack addicts >no? what? fuck nobody's forcing ...fuck Fuck. Americans have some stupid politics. I'm out of here, enjoy bitching about how the world is going to be destroyed.

1 hours later 3675135 Anonymous
>>3675122 >tfw not poor enough to have sex whenever I'm bored

1 hours later 3675183 Anonymous
>>3675135 Well I mean, ghetto dudes live near ghetto chicks, and ghetto chicks are filthy whores.

1 hours later 3675369 Anonymous
Shes a typical leftist slut. Birth control is already cheap. If birth control costs you thousands of dollars every year like she claims then the solution is simple; stop fucking every man you run into. Also you can get birth control for free at free clinics. We pay for enough unnecessary shit with taxes and some college skanks pills and condoms shouldn't be added to that list. What next does this bitch want us to pay for all her abortions?

1 hours later 3675428 Napoleon
Thought of her popped into my head driving home from work tonight. I'm all for women's reproductive rights, but that doesn't mean I'm down to pay for your birth control. Same applies to men, I don't feel I should be paying for an old man's penis pills, but that's not exactly why I'm posting. Since I'm too lazy to do a google search, didn't this broad actually lie about her age and say she was 23? What was the whole ordeal with that, anyway.

1 hours later 3675435 Anonymous (horatio.jpg 688x1024 100kB)
>>3674465 >What does /r9k/ think of Sandra Fluke? I think her birth... ...was a fluke.

1 hours later 3675448 Anonymous
>>3675369 You realize that there are medical benefits to birth control pills outside of simply birth control, correct?

1 hours later 3675517 Anonymous
She seems like an upstanding woman op. A great benefit to society in large.

2 hours later 3675796 Anonymous
It's fine by me. Less unwanted children. Regardless of what evil sluts they are, why would it be bad for there to be less unwanted pregnancies?

2 hours later 3675871 Anonymous
>women have their genitals protected and get free birth control so they can slut it up as much as they want (and if it fails the man has to pay for it anyway) >men get their genital mutilated and will never get a pill because feminists don't want men to have control voer the reproductive process America is wonderful.

2 hours later 3675928 Anonymous
>>3675871 They're developing a male birth control pill now. Plus if you don't trust a woman why have sex with someone you don't trust? You can put on a condom you know. . .

2 hours later 3676055 Anonymous
>>3675871 Don't men get vasectomy?

2 hours later 3676064 Anonymous
>>3676055 Not for free, and by that logic women should get their tubes tied instead of having the pill.

2 hours later 3676083 Anonymous
Tax payer's money should not go towards paying for women to have casual sex. She's asking for her sex to payed for. That is prostitution.

2 hours later 3676148 Anonymous
>>3676083 So you'd rather that all the people having this wonton casual sex have children they probably don't want and use welfare to support them?

2.629 0.120