4chan archive /r9k/ (index)
similar threads
2014-04-05 01:36 11214257 Anonymous (1396555886208.jpg 800x1200 666kB)
Completely serious question: Are all women sluts?

1 min later 11214268 Anonymous
All? No. Though I would argue that those who aren't have aspirations of being one.

3 min later 11214284 Anonymous
For your question to be answered, first you have to define "slut".

4 min later 11214287 Anonymous
No, they aren't. Only bitter beta losers say that. /thread

4 min later 11214293 Anonymous
>>11214257 Ask ur mum wownotsurprisedthiswasntoriginal

5 min later 11214294 Anonymous
If all men suddenly turned to women, would they be sluts?

6 min later 11214301 Anonymous
The women in my family are complete whores, in addition to being bitchy and manipulative. I probably don't have it on good authority to say one way or the other.

7 min later 11214307 Anonymous
I don't know about all women but your mum definitely is

7 min later 11214310 Anonymous
>>11214287 >Being this naive >/thread-ing your own post Stay down, champ. It's not your night.

8 min later 11214319 Anonymous
>>11214293 >>11214307 Are we not above this shit? Are you guys still in highschool, or something?

10 min later 11214325 Anonymous
>>11214294 Not at first, I assume a large portion would be once those female hormones that I hear so much about kick in. m-muh emotions!

10 min later 11214329 Anonymous
If your definition of that is liking sex in general and not just getting wet after your wedding night for your first love, then yes. If you mean rampant one night stand searchers who will fuck out of lust, boredom, attentionwhoring or for material goods, then no.

12 min later 11214343 Anonymous (1346243565917.jpg 955x1151 225kB)
No, but majority are, and most of the rest have definite potential to be.

13 min later 11214350 Anonymous
>>11214319 Woah look how serious this loser is on 4chan LOL

14 min later 11214353 Desolation (1396037885321.jpg 900x1200 477kB)
>>11214257 99% of them either are sluts or probably would be sluts if they had the means for it. So we can round it up to simple YES.

15 min later 11214358 Anonymous
>>11214350 It's not about being serious. I'd just like think the average 4chan poster is above such a cheap joke.

16 min later 11214360 Anonymous
I know quite a few who do not have the slut personality, so no.

17 min later 11214364 Anonymous
>>11214358 >its not about being serious >seriously contemplating that 4chan users are x lmfao, get a load of your retardation

17 min later 11214369 Anonymous
>>11214358 >>11214319 Right, because the umpteenth misogyny post is so much more refreshing?

17 min later 11214370 Anonymous
No, but these bitter 'men' will try to convince you as much as they've convinced themselves that all women are cock-craving whores. How could they not be? I have shit skills at picking up girls, so they must be fucking every guy in the country.

19 min later 11214381 Anonymous
>Are all women sluts? Do birds fly?

20 min later 11214383 Anonymous
>>11214369 They're better than 'your mom' jokes, definitely.

20 min later 11214388 Anonymous
If you really want to know maybe you should ask a group without such horribly skewed views on women.

21 min later 11214392 Anonymous
>>11214257 Does a bear shit inna woods?

22 min later 11214401 Anonymous
>>11214381 Penguins don't fly.

24 min later 11214407 Anonymous
>>11214401 I think he meant that a large amount of birds fly but there are certainly exceptions to that rule. Either that or he is really stupid.

29 min later 11214435 Anonymous
>>11214370 >men Nah, I can agree, and I see a lot of sluts and whores.

31 min later 11214447 Anonymous
By their mid-40s most men have had 8 sexual partners while most women have had 4.

34 min later 11214460 Anonymous
>>11214447 are you going to quote any sources or just go off of assumption?

35 min later 11214466 Anonymous (1396546816353.gif 520x446 597kB)
>>11214401 >>11214407 >taking it this literal Fucking Autistics I swear... guess I gotta explain this. It's supposed to be like a yes or no question....in which this case is yes, which would of then lead to the answer OP was asking.

35 min later 11214468 Anonymous
>>11214447 Judging by the amount of sex people around me seem to get, I choose to believe that statistic is bullshit. Maybe 30 years ago, but not now.

37 min later 11214483 Anonymous (1390842181826.png 1232x1079 83kB)
>>11214460 It's been posted plenty of times, it doesn't matter because there's knee jerk >but they all lie and actually sucked over 9000 cocks they just hide it on tests Anyway pic related sources at the bottom.

39 min later 11214500 Anonymous
>>11214483 Statistics don't actually mean anything though.

42 min later 11214507 Anonymous
>>11214500 Statistics don't real, only feels.

43 min later 11214508 Anonymous
>>11214500 But they do when it's about virginal women in combination with marriage, amirite?

43 min later 11214512 Anonymous
>>11214508 No, you are not rite.

44 min later 11214514 Anonymous (oibugvyuhinjm.jpg 804x550 53kB)
>>11214468 >>11214460 This guy has it >>11214483 I only have the PDF listed there.

48 min later 11214533 Anonymous
>>11214512 Then props on being one of the handful on here with a consistent line of thinking that isn't draped a around the core belief that [women/normalfags/non-whites/whatev er] are scum and the root of all evil.

1 hours later 11214594 Anonymous
>>11214483 >still doesnt know that women are masters of omission of truth When they were answering it, they were thinking "sexual relations IN A RELATIONSHIP", and just decided to exclude flings.

1 hours later 11214606 Anonymous
>>11214594 >is given solid data >b-b-but it doesn't fit my worldview, therefore it's false!

1 hours later 11214616 Anonymous
>>11214594 Oh what, you can look into the head of people you never even saw? Teach me your ways! But seriously I don't doubt that in reality the numbers are closer apart, it's a well known phenomenon that people try to look good on even test lists as mundane as "what did you eat last month". I see no reason to assume people didn't exaggerate to seem like a more womanizing or conservative person than they are. However when you're a board that eats up any incredible story about a woman pulling unrealistic shit to fuck up someone's life, yet scream for sources and numbers when a claim is made that would make women look good or even just like human beings instead of crazed turbosluts, THEN you choose to fully ignore the sources based on a theory in favor of your personal theories and anecdotal evidence it gets frustrating and tiring as shit. Honestly I wish I knew a discussion board where people were better at actually discussing stuff rather than just trying to shove their personal hang ups down other people's throat and call them whatever name comes to them first if they dare to not agree, but I'm just too awkward for a non-anonymous discussion board. Ah well.

1 hours later 11214625 Anonymous
>>11214616 >closer apart Full retard, *closer together

1 hours later 11214647 Anonymous
>>11214257 >Are all women sluts? Yes, transsexuals and twinks also apply

1 hours later 11214652 Anonymous
top lel, 4 sexual partners? yeah fucking right. women are not only whores, they're lying whores. small town, big town, cities, suburbs, it doesn't matter where they are, if there are men around they will fuck the top 10% almost exclusively how many of us went to high school with girls who had been with at least 4 guys by the time they were sophmores? that number can quadruple by the time they finish senior year. and then college? holy shit have you seen what girls do in college? they fuck and they suck and they don't stop sucking and fucking until they get too drunk and they pass out.

1 hours later 11214705 Anonymous
>>11214652 >I believe my wild generalizations over statistics from studies why are you guys so hellbent on convincing yourselves that the world is so much more horrible than it is? is it part of the "my failures are everyone else fault" mindset?

1 hours later 11214711 robot2000
I don't know about sluts but ALL women prefer alpha males. Even the virgins and good girls. No chick gets wet over a nice guy beta.

1 hours later 11214724 Anonymous
>>11214652 not sure about that, dude youve got any tangible proof of your claims?

1 hours later 11214725 Anonymous
>>11214711 What's even your definition of alpha in this context, someone with base level confidence and social skills?

1 hours later 11214765 Anonymous
>>11214725 >omeone with base level confidence and social skills? Robot's definition of the top 5% of males right here.

1 hours later 11214770 Anonymous (1392461796045.jpg 720x960 90kB)
Among women there is a large number of them that are remarkably average to the point that they pass outside of the radar. There is nothing spectacular about them outwardly, and in fact they are so indistinct you can't really help yourself from not noticing them. They do not dress with the trends and they are pretty shy as well. When you look at them they might seem lonely or awkward and they are almost universally surrounded by a circle of friends that are similar to them. And within this echo chamber of their circle of jaded friends they become suspicious of men and hostile towards them. They are fain to wonder where are all the good men, and they are likely just as vicious in identifying & denouncing sluts as you are. Fundamentally, these women are the female equivalents of yourselves. And while you all endlessly spout that you want a relationship so badly, you rightly know that if you approached one of these imperfect women, your chances would be significantly higher. Yet why don't you? Because you don't want a relationship as much as you think. If it was the relationship and companionship you were wanting you would jump at the opportunity to have any relationship with any one. But you don't. What you what is a flourishing female to be your girl, a particular person segregated from the common. And since this is what you want, you are therefore neither forever alone, or, if you are, it is entirely by your choice, nor are you different than females: for although you like to claim of females that it is impossible for them to be alone since the opportunity for them to be in a relationship is so available, fundamentally you are doing the same as they are. Isn't it that at the end of the day men and women are the same?

1 hours later 11214795 Anonymous
>>11214770 >your chances would be significantly higher. But you just said they're hostile towards men. >Isn't it that at the end of the day men and women are the same? The answer to that is no.

1 hours later 11214815 Anonymous
>>11214795 Good catch, but while you too are hostile towards women, don't you endlessly welcome them and pine after them all the same? It is just more likely that the woman in question is more acquainted with feminist rhetoric, and will attribute your errors to the failures of men rather than yourself.

1 hours later 11214822 robot2000
>>11214725 Good social skills, fucks a lot of women, doesn't give a fuck (high confidence), and treats women like the cum dumpsters they are.

1 hours later 11214830 Anonymous
>>11214770 my standards aren't that high she only has to have >large firm high breasts >be less than 120 pounds >have no acne >thick salon styled hair >hourglass figure with birthing hips >dress up nice every day WHY does she only go for chad thundercock???? EWW YUCK i'm not settling for no pizza face or beached whale lol

1 hours later 11214832 Anonymous
>>11214815 Why do you assume I'm hostile towards women? I love women, they just don't like me. I don't even begrudge them for that, I probably wouldn't like me either. I guess what you're trying to say is that women and men are both equally hypocritical, right?

1 hours later 11214841 Anonymous
>>11214830 Ha. >>11214832 If you aren't hostile towards women then you do not represent the majority and are an atypical case. For your case the old adage is true: that if you do not like yourself, how can you expect any other to?

1 hours later 11214851 Anonymous
>>11214841 I don't expect any other to though.

1 hours later 11214863 Anonymous
>>11214851 Then I don't understand your position.

1 hours later 11214874 Anonymous
>>11214863 I was just trying to say not everyone here hates women. Then I went off on a tangent.

2 hours later 11214926 Anonymous
>>11214483 Can I just say that that was really fucking depressing. Realising what a loser I am is shit. I might be normal in all other respects, but godamn. If only wizard powers were real.

2 hours later 11214989 Anonymous
>>11214483 I wrote a big explanation about the results of this research but I doubt anyone will read it so I'm gonna say this: >women -dont want to look like sluts -lie and say they've had fewer sexual partners >men -think its cool to have had a lot of sexual partners -lie and state more sexual partners than they've really had

2 hours later 11214995 Anonymous
>>11214616 aye, that is the case around these parts. Though I'd be lying if I said I often don't enjoy reading these negative views and doomsday scenarios.I don't know why I sometimes get a kick out of it, I don't think I ever let the delusion sink in though It does make me err on the side of caution. For others a comforting lie is easier to swallow, the generalizations and stereotypes may hold something of meaning that is applicable to some cases but it seldom if ever reveals the reality and complexity of the situation. Like it or not there are so many factors involved including ones self. It's easier to blame a foreign entity than to seek out your own flaws and enhance your perspective of the world. It all seems to revolve around one's own self esteem, plenty of insecurities and peer pressure from the media all the way down to personal connections and contacts. Those whom sink deep enough into this pit of agony and despair will become susceptible to radicalization and further delusion. Change is difficult for many, not everyone can be self motivated given the circumstances surrounding them. In the end of the day we are all biological machines, robots whose entire life is constructed based on sensory feedback, If an appropriate level of motivating feedback and positive reinforcement does not exist then it is more likely to sink into stagnation. Kind of reminds me of an experiment on electrocuting dogs that was performed. One group can disable the device, the other group couldn't. Once put into another test chamber where they can hop to escape electrocution the first group escaped while the other group just sat there and gave up to pain and electrocution. thinking there is no other option.

2 hours later 11215014 Anonymous
>>11214364 >lmfao back to leddit with you

7 hours later 11217332 Anonymous
I am female. I am not a slut. So the question has been answered for sure now.

7 hours later 11217371 Anonymous
>>11217332 so then you are a virgin.

7 hours later 11217425 Anonymous
>>11217371 No, Im not. But Im not a slut either.

3.154 0.112