4chan archive /r9k/ (index)
similar threads
2014-03-02 06:07 10819217 Anonymous (df6f98c89c2d11e3aba40eb5267b13ce_8.jpg 640x640 53kB)
What cultural and social conditions in the Western world have lead to the current situation of all women being whores? Was it that women have changed? Or have all women always been simply biologically programmed this way, but men have, until now kept it under wraps? Did women change, social structures change, or a mix of both? Did shifting social conditions allow or cause women to evolve from faithful, strong, and dignified to shallow, petty, and whorish? What are your thoughts on the causes of this phenomenon?

1 min later 10819235 Anonymous
Sexual liberation movement of the 60's. It was also the time that religious values which promote marriage started a steep decline.

2 min later 10819242 Anonymous (pokemon.jpg 209x242 5kB)
It is an unexplainable force of nature.

3 min later 10819253 Anonymous
>>10819242 goddamn, earlier than I expected. I was trying to guess how soon DA JOOS or DA FEMINAZIS would show up. I wrongly figured 4th post.

4 min later 10819263 Anonymous
>>10819253 If not the six trillionaires or the cunt crusaders, then who?

6 min later 10819277 Anonymous
Men have lost all power in the social relationship, and we continue to lose. Feminism, broken homes, weak male ego are all to blame

6 min later 10819278 Anonymous
>>10819217 >Or have all women always been simply biologically programmed this way, but men have, until now kept it under wraps? This. Basically men kept women in line until we became more or less equal, and now women just use men to get pounded and claim child support checks.

6 min later 10819284 Anonymous
What happened was we realized that women are capable huma beings also and have them their deserved ability to make choices and be independent etc. With their new found power they capitilized, but where they were most successful is keeping all the benefits of the past treatment of them by men. So now they get to do whatever they want, how they want and men still have to adhere to to the same role they had in the 50's. "women love to be capitilaist in the work place and socialist outside of it." "They feel entitled to the redistribution of wealth from men to women." forgot hte name of the guy who said that, was a post on him earlier today. Basically they want all the advantages without any disadvantages.

7 min later 10819290 Anonymous
Hollywood, the music industry and liberals encourage this behaviour. Also everyone knows Hollywood and the music industry is owned by Jews is not a "theory". Good day.

8 min later 10819296 Anonymous
>>10819235 Before the 1960's most women were very religious and close minded. Very likely they were very boring and plain and much less real life experience that men could relate to. Even if women sleep around more, it's not like that affects me much, so I much prefer it this way. It's much easier to find someone you can truly relate to, as opposed to a wife who will have my kids and do house work but have nothing in common with me.

9 min later 10819308 Anonymous (1388349611866.jpg 515x500 47kB)
>>10819253 >he thinks /pol/ is satire >mfw it's actually the jews fault

13 min later 10819348 Anonymous
>>10819217 This is what happens when the state takes the place of fathers and husbands. Women have more incentive to stay single and whore around under this system, so that's what most of them choose to do.

15 min later 10819371 Anonymous
>>10819284 >They feel entitled to the redistribution of wealth from men to women. And this is why they have no right to call themselves independent.

17 min later 10819380 Anonymous
>>10819348 >This is what happens when the state takes the place of fathers and husbands. ^This Does she need a man for protection? No, she has the police Does she need a man to provide? No, she has social programs Does she need to be a good wife? No, she can just divorce and take half your stuff Does she need to be mindful of who she fucks? No, she has birth control and abortion

17 min later 10819381 Anonymous
>>10819296 >implying most robots dont want a docile slave waifu You arent dealing with normal people here

19 min later 10819404 Anonymous (euphoria.jpg 576x792 215kB)
>>10819308 no, you fuckhead, it's the feminists fault. a few jew cartoons mean nothing, but tons of feminist writing, rallies and indoctrination at universities made feminism mainstream.

23 min later 10819451 Anonymous
>>10819381 I guess I just don't get the appeal of owning a slave wife. It sounds horribly sad and depressing.

24 min later 10819466 Anonymous
>>10819380 Definitely pasting this.

27 min later 10819492 Anonymous
>>10819380 >Does she need a man to provide? No, she has social programs I'd amend this slightly. Social programs and the ability to land high paying jobs. Everyone knows the glass ceiling is a myth, and women are attending college at vastly higher rates than men are, so women will naturally land in the higher paying jobs (and the lower paying waitress type jobs as well, for the uneducated.)

30 min later 10819522 Anonymous (meet-the-staff7-e1384368823807.png 550x1828 357kB)
>>10819492 not only is it a myth, it's a flat out lie. Women are horribly susceptible to the apex fallacy. They think every man is successful . Why? Because every man who isn't successful doesn't exist to them. In reality, a few % of men are really successful. In a woman's view, it's every man. she doesn't see nor care about the other 80-95% who struggle to get by.

40 min later 10819619 Anonymous
>>10819380 >>10819348 Nails being hit on heads.

1 hours later 10819897 Anonymous (soundsgoodtome.gif 290x231 999kB)
>>10819522 >dat concubine

1 hours later 10819917 Anonymous
>>10819522 10/10 business structure.

1 hours later 10820073 Anonymous
Women have always been whores. I am completely certain of this. Women would fuck the neighbor's husband while her own husband was out at work. They'd fuck the hired help. They'd fuck strangers while out and about running errands. The stigma just isn't a strong now, so there's much less discreteness. In addition to discretion being more difficult with technology being such a big part of our lives, we just see instances of it come to light. Society hasn't dipped much at all. If anything, this benefits us. We can now spot a common whore from a mile away.

1 hours later 10820099 Anonymous
1) birth control 2) The pay gap closed. Back in the day, women didn't work or get hired, therefore if they wanted a divorce they were shit out of luck since they didn't have any income. People were always miserable in marriage, now they can actually leave.

1 hours later 10820117 Anonymous
>>10819217 student of history here nothing ever changes

1 hours later 10820149 Anonymous
>>10819917 >>10819897 You do realize this is the business equivalent of Chad and his harem of girls? The funny part is when feminists complained about this, none of them complained about the fact that women held 90% of the jobs at this company and men were being excluded from the lower ranks. They just complained there were no female senior managers. Women don't give a shit about equality.

1 hours later 10820160 Anonymous
>>10819217 Hey, are you that robot who used to be friends with a pro-golfer and posted his pictures a few times? I can't find the picture of the guy anymore.

1 hours later 10820172 Anonymous
>>10819451 >not impregnating her with 12 kids and have a big happy family Seriously, having twelve kids means you don't need other people to socially interact with

1 hours later 10820188 Anonymous
People have been fucking for hundreds of thousands of years. Are you being serious here.

1 hours later 10820189 Anonymous (1384343585565.png 215x161 64kB)
>>10820117 >nothing ever changes >student of history People thinking history is circular is probably one of the things that pisses me off the most. No, not everything was exactly as it is for you, the Universe isn't centred around you.

1 hours later 10820224 Anonymous
>>10820117 You sound retarded for a student of history. Human nature doesn't change, but the societies we build and the dreams we aspire to, and the things we discover were greater each generation, not counting the middle-ages.

1 hours later 10820227 Anonymous
>>10820149 >You do realize this is the business equivalent of Chad and his harem of girls? Their posts indicate they realize this exactly.

1 hours later 10820241 Anonymous
>>10819522 That's pretty similar to my company. Every board member is male, every executive is male, nearly all VPs are male, middle managers down are almost all female. I am almost the only guy that exists at this company that isn't upper management. I'd say my company is 70% female

1 hours later 10820334 Anonymous
women have been harem whores throughout all of history, bro 80% of women reproduced compared to only 40% of men

1 hours later 10820343 Anonymous
>>10819217 it's quite simple. media drives the idea that sex means everything. being attractive leads to more sex. holidays are about sex. the clothes you wear, the car you drive, the job you hold. which brings me to women, and how this ties in. typically, money is gained through employment, which is linked to your education, except in rare cases with entrepreneurs that get rich despite being dropouts. so, what is the quickest path to wealth, as a female? fucking a successful man. by doing this, they reap all the benefits of the male, and all they have to do is spread their legs. pretty sweet deal, isn't it? now, if the quickest road to riches is by putting out, are you surprised that so many women are whores? education guarantees nothing! but sex...is a powerful tool.

2 hours later 10820804 Anonymous (2ee9b7f52c459ca30f89ae4ff789119d.jpg 1174x1200 343kB)
>>10819522 >mfw i live in south east england Also I checked the pages, seems they removed that section.

8 hours later 10822755 Anonymous (1392669807554.jpg 256x256 66kB)
>>10819522 >apex fallacy blix

9 hours later 10823161 Anonymous
>>10819380 ZING! i like it.

9 hours later 10823189 Anonymous (1342368574601.jpg 280x355 26kB)
>>10819217 >Project so hard motherfuckers want to fine me that shit cray

9 hours later 10823343 Anonymous
>>10819217 from the perspective of a 'Murican male > women are offered a plethora of nice things by males >males offer most of these things under the expectation that attention, or better yet affection, be paid to them >women can get more out of this situation by having sex with 'generous' males This business-transaction relationship is what keeps my broke ass from a girlfriend within 5 years of my age also >women spend an inordinate amount of time trying to be 'appealing', 'presentable', etc >ignore the robot's connotations on this being solely for the purpose of seducing Chad and belittling you; that's childish and unlikely. >women find men that they deem worthy of all the time put into themselves, 'desirable' men that find said female desirable. > She fucks him because she desires the attractive male MAYBE 10% of the time, tops. > 90% of the time, she fucks him because she wants to BE desired by ANY attractive male ALL THE TIME. tl;dr all females want is to feel good, be wanted, and be cared about, like anyone else. They just happen to have a door to the first two by opening their legs and a door to the third by creating the false impression that they will. Don't tell me you would stay totally incorruptibly virgin-pure if people were literally trying to funnel nice things down your throat, either. You'd have to be really fucking stupid.

10 hours later 10823405 Anonymous
>>10819235 fucking degenerate hippies...

11 hours later 10823827 Anonymous
>>10819380 So it's only bad if you're male, and are unable to sustain a relationship that doesn't require complete and utter dependence on you. I see a Darwin Award in your future, son.

11 hours later 10823886 Anonymous (it was the kikes.jpg 650x567 107kB)
>>10819404 >implying it wasn't kikes who funded and pushed feminism onto the masses

11 hours later 10824061 Anonymous
>>10823827 No, women are unable to sustain a relationship that doesn't require complete and utter dependence.

11 hours later 10824102 Anonymous
>>10819522 holy shit that's in my town what are the fucking odds

11 hours later 10824133 Anonymous (1390951612308.jpg 1280x1937 350kB)
You may not believe me, but as I'm always willing to tell you--the problem with modern women is men. When men are wise, when are they are subscribed to the correct philosophies, and when they lead lives of virtue, their use for women becomes very specific and admirable, in that they want upstanding wives who will be loyal to them and graceful, and who will prove excellent mothers to their children. And since this becomes the widespread want of men, women in suit adopt themselves in order to remain valued. They will instead of their current habits outfit themselves as respectable women, and everything from their mores and manners to their way of appearance will all be oriented in such a way to catch our eye as being respectable. But yet, when we reject the correct philosophies of our forbears and take up that dangerous LIberalism which makes a mockery of all society, the practice of virtue by men becomes nonexistent, and what happens instead is that selfishness, hedonism, and disregard for the health of the whole that we witness today. Men no longer few their women as kin and who will make good wives and mothers to them, but instead they see "pieces of ass" that they can satisfy themselves with. And since this is what men come to want, women outfit themselves in such a way. They lose all motivation to be respectable and they instead flaunt their sexual nature and dress as sexual objects. Yet in either situation women are merely adapting to meet the requirements of men. If you want better women, then reject all women who behave in this way. And all men must fix to do this, so that slutty women will lose. Yet in order for men to do that, they must begin living lives of virtue. And in order to do that, you must abandon liberal hedonism, and become the virtuous man we have always told you to be.

11 hours later 10824187 Anonymous (1393571011280.jpg 383x390 29kB)
>>10819217 Marxism. That might be the wrong word but the idea that everyone is equal is the Pandora's Box of degeneracy. Without that feminism couldn't exist. With the increasing demand for freedom as well as that Marxist mindset it was really only a matter of time until society wound up this way. So yeah, it was really the Jews .

11 hours later 10824203 Anonymous (j460.jpg 460x276 13kB)
>>10819253 >He doesn't think it's the Jews fault. Ever since Jesus the Jews have been chipping away at western morality. These aren't shitposts, bro.

11 hours later 10824212 Anonymous (1384270813529.png 501x585 31kB)
>>10819404 Yeah but who were the feminists writing, rallying an teaching at the universities?

11 hours later 10824241 Anonymous
I really hate to use feminist rhetoric, but honestly, why to women get bad rap for being 'whores' when men still have more sexual partners on average than women?

12 hours later 10824252 Anonymous
>>10824241 But those men are whores too. Just because we live in a whore society where it's acceptable doesn't mean that suddenly everyone should do it.

12 hours later 10824260 Anonymous
>>10824252 Yeah, but you never hear this board calling those men out for being whores. My question is, why not?

12 hours later 10824272 Anonymous
>>10824260 Because they're idiots. Do you even have to ask?

12 hours later 10824285 Anonymous
>>10824260 But they do. The whole "Chad Thundercock" thing is their reaction to man-whores. The weird fear of hypergamy is too since it implies that a very small amount of men are having lots of sex and this is bad.

12 hours later 10824295 Anonymous
>>10824241 u r 2 trool

12 hours later 10824366 Anonymous
>>10824285 >The weird fear of hypergamy is too since it implies that a very small amount of men are having lots of sex and this is bad. Are you fucking dense or something? The MEDIAN man has significantly more sexual partners than the median woman. This isn't the capitalist Jew 1% conspiracy whoring all the women. If you think the average woman is a slut, then the average man is even more of a slut. That's not Chad Thundercock, that's John 'Average' Normalfag.

12 hours later 10824383 Anonymous
>>10824366 no such thing as a male slut, its called a double standard dealwitit

12 hours later 10824385 Anonymous
>>10824366 I never said the Chad Thundercock conspiracy is true, I said that this is the robot's reaction to manwhores.

12 hours later 10824389 Anonymous
>>10824366 >The MEDIAN man has significantly more sexual partners than the median woman. Citation please.

12 hours later 10824508 Anonymous (67.jpg 1232x1079 152kB)
>>10824389 These are UK figures but I assume they're fairly representative of the West as a whole: http://www.thenationalstudent.com/N ews/2013-11-26/How_many_people_is_i t_normal_to_have_had_sex_with.html http://www.thenationalstudent.com/N ews/2013-11-26/How_many_people_is_i t_normal_to_have_had_sex_with.html Also I saw this image on /r9k/ today. I assume it's for the US and maybe the figures are a little outdated, but you can check the saus for yourself if you care. The point is, /r9k/ likes to pretend that all the women are fucking only a tiny percentage of men, leaving your median Mr. Average completely sex starved, having to lower his standards to nothing to get laid occasionally. This board knows it's bullshit, but they like to pretend that a huge percentage of the population is completely unable to find any kind of physical intimacy and is completely powerless to do anything about it. The reality is, this is just an illusion that is created and maintained by never leaving your house and spending all day on a board where half the people are kissless virgins. It isn't reflective of reality, and most robots know this at the back of their mind, but they choose to pretend because it makes them feel better. They just want to pretend that they are doomed to die as virgins and that no amount of attempts at self improvement are going to raise their chances (even though that is complete bullshit). Why do they do this? So they can blame everybody but themselves. That's the defining feature of this board - EVERYBODY is to blame EXCEPT ME. The jews, the femenists, the media, the hippies, the music industry, the sex industry, the gays, my parents, corporations, governments, you name it. Any excuse to blame somebody else so you don't have to even contemplate the idea that your loneliness and lack of fulfillment might just be because you didn't put enough effort in to be the best you could be.

12 hours later 10824541 Anonymous
>>10824508 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h ealthnews/10473822/Women-more-liber ated-as-their-attitudes-to-sex-chan ge.html this was supposed to be posted as the other source. didn't mean to post that link twice. google that shit.

12 hours later 10824549 Anonymous
>>10824508 self-reported studies are invalid.

12 hours later 10824621 Anonymous
>>10824549 So you're going to deny all available statistics? Fine, then you can just make up whatever bullshit you like and falsifying it becomes impossible. Somehow, the average robot, by exercising their bitter imagination, has more insight into reality than thorough recording of surveyed data. But hey, at least you admit that you have no evidence to back up any of the /r9k/ bullshit. Thank god nobody takes this board seriously when they assert that women exist purely to conform to their retarded arbitrary notion of morality.

12 hours later 10824661 Anonymous
>>10824621 www.newscientist.com/article/dn3936 -fake-liedetector-reveals-womens-se x-lies.html

12 hours later 10824687 Anonymous
>>10823343 >Don't tell me you would stay totally incorruptibly virgin-pure if people were literally trying to funnel nice things down your throat, either. You'd have to be really fucking stupid. seconding this

13 hours later 10824907 Anonymous
>>10824661 So we can trust the male numbers but the female numbers are likely to be closer to the male figure? Fine, my point still stands. Also, if that's true, then the large female increase could be simply put down to women becoming more open and comfortable about their DIRTY WHORISH SLUT DEGENERATE NATURE. So maybe... women weren't loose cannons that were being kept under control until only recently... maybe we only just realised what is happening - thanks to this 'sexual revolution'. Hah. In all seriousness though I love watching neo-fascist reactionary far-right morons get mad about the kind of stuff.

13 hours later 10825073 Anonymous
>>10824133 >And in order to do that, you must abandon liberal hedonism, and become the virtuous man we have always told you to be. Its too late, there are no virtuous women. The cycle has broken.

13 hours later 10825143 Anonymous
women indulge in being desired. in their heads, they can say "yep, i've fucked 20 men, i must be really hot!". i have friends who are girls who go to clubs for the sole purpose of rejecting guys in front of their friends to look desired. this is what happens when men sacrifice their masculinity and give women the power.

13 hours later 10825153 Anonymous (13915676012002.jpg 450x800 91kB)
>>10825073 But there are! You just need to find them intelligently. Necessarily the virtuous woman of the present is living her life a little differently than the common woman we might encounter. Once you unlock the secrets to her thinking and habits you will understand where she is.

13 hours later 10825220 Anonymous
>>10824133 This. However, the life of a liberal hedonist is too fucking good. Going to a club, getting high on god knows how many substances, and fucking sluttily-dressed women is better than sitting reading a paper with your boring wife on a sunday morning.

14 hours later 10825303 Anonymous
>>10819217 Jews,liberal and loss of christianity in the community.

14 hours later 10825351 Anonymous
>>10825220 I like reading the paper with my boring wife. Then we listen to npr while drinking tea. Ah, Life is pleasant.

14 hours later 10825419 Anonymous
/r9k/ so really what im hearing in this thread is that humans are all terrible, women just happen to have warm holes we want to put our penis in more than they want a penis in the hole. Sounds like economics to me.

14 hours later 10825444 Anonymous
>>10825153 look at those puppies!

1.485 0.123