4chan archive /lit/ (index)
similar threads
2013-03-09 03:29 3542758 Anonymous (1326422527021.jpg 1000x667 90kB)
How do I find myself a nice /lit/ boyfriend?

1 min later 3542766 Anonymous
Being gay won't help you, OP. Nor will being transsexual. As everyone knows, /lit is completely backwards on transgenderism.

2 min later 3542768 Anonymous
asl?

3 min later 3542769 Anonymous (1351995270346.jpg 700x437 54kB)
>>3542766 Does being female and bicurious put me ahead of the game?

4 min later 3542771 Anonymous
>>3542768 24 (turning 25 in less than a month)/female/NYC area

4 min later 3542773 Anonymous
>>3542771 good god let me smell your feet

5 min later 3542775 Anonymous
>>3542768 >>3542771 >>3542773 pls >>>/soc/

6 min later 3542776 Anonymous
Go to your local library look for the kid wearing chinos and a black petticoat reading a classic. He'll probably be receptive if you keep talking to him. He mostly likely won't make the first move though.

8 min later 3542781 Anonymous
>>3542776 ORRRR >go to your local library >look for the rotund intellectual in a fedora and cape >yiff loudly to get his attention >allow him to sniff your hind quarters >make fox noises together for eternity

9 min later 3542783 Anonymous
This board is for discussing books and literature, not for finding dates. There's a rumor going around that you were claimed, /lit/. Is it true? Please say it isn't so.

12 min later 3542791 Anonymous
Go to a lecture, wait for the break, and try to spot a lonely guy who reads instead of going to talk with people. /thread

13 min later 3542794 Anonymous
Don't bother about real-life guys. The only decent boyfriends are gays or characters in books. Better read books. I speak from experience, being in the 0.001% most decent straight non-character men and still a human trash.

14 min later 3542797 Anonymous
>>3542771 If you're ever in Southern California, I'd squarely fuck you.

16 min later 3542806 Anonymous
>>3542769 sfw?

17 min later 3542808 Anonymous
>>3542806 Breasts aren't NSFW

17 min later 3542811 Anonymous
>>3542771 What borough? just out of curiosity. Im in queens

23 min later 3542823 Anonymous
>>3542794 >Be heterosexual >Be 24 >Be 6'4" >Be 190lbs >Runner's body >Be 6/10 in terms of looks >Dress in khakis and sweaters. >Brownish-auburn hair and green eyes; Scottish-Irish ancestry. >Have auburn beard although I trim it and it doesn't look like shit. >Only had one girlfriend. She ended the relationship because we were going to have sex and I knew she wasn't in an emotionally secure point in her life; when I refused she dumped me. >Quiet, introverted, reactive and an INTP. >Work >Have abandonment issues because parents divorced and promptly ignored me. Scared as fuck to have a woman reject me. Waiting for a girl to show interest before I make a move. Most girls in my life ignore me.

23 min later 3542826 Anonymous (Me sitting on my bed.jpg 400x300 32kB)
This is all i have

25 min later 3542830 Anonymous
>>3542826 No thanks.

25 min later 3542832 Anonymous
>>3542826 Hello Ellie

30 min later 3542846 Anonymous
>>3542758 More pics like OP.

34 min later 3542859 Anonymous
>>3542826 Lift weights and get some sun and I'd hit it.

37 min later 3542871 Anonymous
>>3542758 To imagine myself in this tiny bedroom with a cup of coffee and a qt by my side is giving me the greatest boner.

41 min later 3542884 Anonymous
>>3542775 Unfortunately /soc/ is just a cease pool of interracial tits and oversized dicks. I'm not so into that. >>3542776 Tried that. We dated for a bit, but he has horrible anxiety. >>3542794 >thatfeel.jpg >>3542806 It's anthropology, it's sfw >>3542808 Fuck you, are you saying that Venus is nsfw? >>3542823 I'd be all over you

43 min later 3542888 Anonymous (1326420877013.jpg 480x451 73kB)
>>3542846

44 min later 3542889 Anonymous (1321753794083.jpg 425x640 305kB)
>>3542888

44 min later 3542891 Anonymous (IMG_1493.jpg 320x358 33kB)
>>3542889

45 min later 3542895 Anonymous (1326532955120.jpg 396x516 82kB)
>>3542891

46 min later 3542899 Anonymous
>>3542794 This from someone that likely fills their mind with Jane Austen and paranormal romance.

46 min later 3542901 Anonymous (1326520559233.jpg 600x396 33kB)
>>3542895

46 min later 3542904 Anonymous
>>3542826 You're cute. Too bad you're white. :(

49 min later 3542914 Anonymous
>>3542826 I'd love you tenderly if I weren't a kissless virgin who wouldn't know what to do with a woman if she leapt on me. We could still read together, though.

50 min later 3542921 Anonymous
>>3542899 I've never read Jane Austen or any paranormal romance for that respect. I simply think the only kind of legally allowed relationship should be lesbian sexual or platonic relationship. Heterosexual intercourse should be practiced not as a normal activity but as a regular transgression of institued relatoinships. Marriage for lesbians only, and all man and woman sex should be a lesbian cheating on her spouse with a man.

50 min later 3542923 Anonymous
>>3542889 That's my future.

51 min later 3542927 Anonymous (cat-its-beautiful-757604.jpg 480x640 30kB)
>>3542889

52 min later 3542928 Anonymous
>>3542794 Is this what betas actually believe?

53 min later 3542931 Anonymous
>>3542921 Please shoot yourself in the throat

54 min later 3542936 Anonymous (1362611398463.jpg 700x510 82kB)
>>3542921 >I've never read Jane Austen or any paranormal romance for that respect. Someone get this broad a copy of The Elements of Style, stat!

57 min later 3542941 Anonymous
>>3542794 >>3542921 Maybe if you weren't as bitter as your posts would imply, someone would actually like you. Then you can annoy and alienate them with your femi-fascist nonsense.

58 min later 3542946 Anonymous
>>3542931 Would you that cause me any kind of sexual plesaure ? Also, are you a lesbian ? I promise I will never have your girlfriend cheat on you with me (from now on at least) I you're afraid of that. And >>3542928 I couldn't tell yo, I'm not a beta. But from experience, vaginas tend to get worn-out very quickly in the case of frequent heterosexual intercourse. That is why I advocate for this kind of intercourse to be performed only as a transgression, thus enriching the experience with a sense of shared threat and the pride we get from daring to cross the line of the forbidden. Preserving humanity's vaginas, enforcing spiritual (and not merely natural) selection among men and stirring (so to speak) their spirit by adding challenge. It would certainly contribute to the noble task of reviving our dying culture.

1 hours later 3542956 Anonymous
>>3542946 500/10 I legitimately want to murder you

1 hours later 3542966 Anonymous
>>3542936 Are The Elements of Style enlightening ? Are they sexually challenging ? Mere curiosity. >>3542941 I'm not any bit bitter, sir. Simply enlightened. I think you misunderstood me, I have nothing against heterosexual intercourse per se, I even practice it very eagerly. But for the reasons I exposed above, I think we need to make it more difficult and more challenging. Lesbian intercourse aren't inherently superior, simply more preserving, more fitting as long-term managment is concerned. Vaginas are precious, sir, we ought to preserve them as we can. And for that matter, I don't envision such an ideal state with an harsh enforcement of laws.Getting a girl to cheat on her spouse would be considered a noble feat, such as capturing a prisoner was in Ancient times. But it would be punished nevertheless if you let yourself get caught, albeit non-lethally so.

1 hours later 3542973 Anonymous
>>3542956 Thank you, sir. Would you do it in a sexual way or simply with well-tested method ? I'm curious to the utmost.

1 hours later 3542978 Anonymous (bb.jpg 768x1024 135kB)
>>3542946 It's people like this that make me happy I avoid dating women with intellectual pretensions. I have work colleagues and friends to discuss, say, Classical Chinese allusions in Soseki or the drive toward tendency and disintegration in Beethoven's late music. All I want is a woman happy with being a woman and not looking to be my rival or whatever. Average girls are easily impressed with a man who can be funny and nice. When they come back to my place and see the thousands of books in my apartment, it does provoke curiosity. But, thank goodness, I'm spared their pretenses. They're just fun to be around with.

1 hours later 3542987 Anonymous (EBVyPul.gif 504x284 2032kB)
>>3542978 Scared lil virgin

1 hours later 3542994 Anonymous
>>3542987 fat ugly dyke

1 hours later 3543001 Anonymous
>>3542978 I understand that you can be genuinely terrified by my level of enlightenment. Even I was at first. Average people just can't take it. Your avoiding of pretenses is all good as long as you pay attention to how you preserve vaginas and enlighten minds. This is all that there is to attain a superior state of being. But don't be upset when an over-literated gentleman sleeps with your innocent girlfriend. He is simply winning the great challenge of rising toward sexual patricianship.

1 hours later 3543003 Anonymous
>>3542826 I'd marry you if you lived in Canada.

1 hours later 3543004 Anonymous
>>3542994 No, I just know you

1 hours later 3543008 Anonymous
>>3542978 This I agree with. In my experience Relationships with other artsy-lit-intellect types < relationships with regular chicks.

1 hours later 3543010 Anonymous
>>3542978 >intellectual partner >has to be a rival >thousands of books >still sexists you sure are unenlightened AND an atheist

1 hours later 3543011 Anonymous
>>3542978 is that why you stopped replying to my emails ;_;

1 hours later 3543017 Anonymous
>>3543011 Who is this?

1 hours later 3543019 Anonymous
>>3542978 >All I want is a woman happy with being a woman The fuck does that mean?

1 hours later 3543020 Anonymous
>>3543010 You are right, anon. Quoted anon is a retarded sexist. The enlightenment of the mind comes from the caring for the vagina, but the other way around is true also. Never neglect the sexual power of books, always ponder the intellectual liberation of sex.

1 hours later 3543021 Anonymous
>>3543001 Troll thread confirmed.

1 hours later 3543025 Anonymous
>>3543019 >hurr women cant handle or do muh intellectualism (even though i'm too much of a dumb fuck for serious philosophy or pure mathematics)

1 hours later 3543027 Anonymous
>>3543019 >i.e. woman who enjoys adhering to traditional gender roles. What's wrong with that?

1 hours later 3543028 Anonymous
>>3543017 Haha, you may not be the same person, but it was someone else into Japanese & Chinese lit as well as classical music. I am someone they contacted in a /lit/ penpal thread and then they stopped replying.

1 hours later 3543030 Anonymous
>>3543028 (and I assumed you were he because I know he's around today, because he has very specific tastes in female authors)

1 hours later 3543031 Anonymous (1runchildrun.jpg 800x600 113kB)
OH YEAH FUCK WOMNE MHM I LOVE ME SOME ALPHA MALE COCK RIGHT UP MY DOMIANT MALE ASSHOLE OH YEAH FUCKIN BITCHES I DONT NEED YOU

1 hours later 3543032 Anonymous
>>3543021 If by troll you mean dialectical enlightenment (in a rather Hegelian sense) then surely yes. Captcha: poets andhivo.

1 hours later 3543033 Anonymous
>>3543020 What does "enlightenment" have to do with anything? Why can't one enjoy sex simply as something beautiful in and of itself without concern for ideology? Why get angry over another person's personal choice that does not affect you either directly or indirectly? For all this talk of "enlightenment" you people sure are fascist prudes.

1 hours later 3543034 Anonymous
GIVE IT TO ME OH YEAH BIG MALE PENIS MHM YEAH VAGINAS ARE GROSS I LOVE SWEATY MALE ASSHOLE FROM PUMPING MANLY WEIGHTS SUCH MY HARD ALPHA MALE 20 INCH DICK

1 hours later 3543039 Anonymous
>>3543031 Who are you responding to, sir ? I'm afraid the point you are trying to make isn't too clear.

1 hours later 3543042 Anonymous
>>3543039 WHO U CALLIN A "SIR" MOTHERGFUCKER I AM GODDAMN APE MASTER ALPHA MALE FUCKIN WOMEN I DONT NEDE THEM OH YEAH GIVE IT OT EMGMDSFMSDFHJSRUITYG8I4WTKWJFDHBHDS GJFADKGKJDAGJ FUCK YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHH

1 hours later 3543045 Anonymous
Is it bad to want girls who had few or no sexual partners?

1 hours later 3543051 Anonymous
>>3543045 No, just boring as fuck.

1 hours later 3543053 Anonymous
Is it bad to want men who had few or no sexual partners?

1 hours later 3543055 Anonymous
>>3543045 Yes, because it means that you are cis male scum who doesn't respect a woman's right to have sex with as many partners as she wants and suffer no repercussions.

1 hours later 3543057 Anonymous
>>3543055 HURR I AM LE IRONIC EDGY CONSERVATIVE I HATE MY LIBERAL PARENTS ALL MY HIGHSCHOOL CRUSHES WOULDN'T DATE ME EVEN THOUGH I AM AN ALPHA MALE IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE FUCKIN FEMINISM

1 hours later 3543059 Anonymous
>>3543055 Are you implying that women shouldn't have free sexual agency? On what grounds? Should men be impaired in the same fashion?

1 hours later 3543060 Anonymous
>>3543045 Only if you think girls who had several sexual partners are "sluts". If not, then you're good.

1 hours later 3543064 Anonymous
>>3543033 Enlightenment isn't a ideology, but a state of mind, it is you in feeling both the extense and the limitations of your mind, its overwhelming power as well as its perputual hinting at something, something farther. But this is merely intellectual enlightenment, which is obviously the first step, but should be followed by sexual elightenment. Which itself can't be achieved is vaginas aren't properly cared for. Quod erat demonstrandum. It is not about denying the beauty of sex, rather about exalting it and experiencing it more thoroughly. Not all sexual intercourses are created equal. Nothing can match the level of extasis of an intercourse between two enlightened beings (particularly if one is anally enlightened while the other is genitally enlightened but that's a bit of a technicality). And I am by no means angry, sir. I'm simply disapointed at beholding the unenlightenment of some people in this place from which I expected a lot. As for the fascism, I guess you are among the one who associate mind superiority and sexual mastery with fascism. That's a common mistake. But the fact you're overwhelmed but my intelligence shouldn't have you mistake me for a fascist, not at all-those people were actually very unenlightened.

1 hours later 3543065 Anonymous
>>3543060 Why should that matter to anyone? As long as they're with me at the moment and they're STD-free then that's all that matters. I agree that this obsession with "purity" is pretty retarded.

1 hours later 3543068 Anonymous
>>3543064 >freudaftereadinghegelandthekamasut ra.jpg

1 hours later 3543069 Anonymous
>>3543059 Yes, I was, but I don't really believe that. I'm just being silly on 4chan, and I thought I would say the obvious response.

1 hours later 3543072 Anonymous
>>3543068 I guess if you could create a crossover between Freud, Hegel and a master of Kamasutra it would end in someone rather advanced on the path of enlightenment. In rather tend to think of myself as Socrates enjoying platonic love with Kant while indulging in sexual experiment with Marie Curie and Emmy Noether. But thak you for the compliment anyway.

1 hours later 3543073 Anonymous (1362702991877.jpg 567x425 77kB)
>>3543064 >But the fact you're overwhelmed but my intelligence

1 hours later 3543078 Anonymous (1231791050326.jpg 260x320 35kB)
>>3543064 >Enlightenment isn't a ideology >a >But the fact you're overwhelmed but my intelligence

1 hours later 3543088 Anonymous (photo(10).jpg 1536x2048 1342kB)
>>3542797 I'm in SoCal, bro. Let's hang out, check out my books. Nevermind, I already uploaded them here: >>3542587 Check out my face instead.

1 hours later 3543090 Anonymous
>>3543078 I'm sorry sir. I just started learning English five hours ago and I have grown tired of the endless sexual intercourse I have been very actively involved in over the twelve past hours. You're right to spot my mistake. >>3543073 Thank you for enjoying my sense of humor. I'll teach you the theory of humor enlightenment next time, if I am too busy at my vagina-caring facility.

1 hours later 3543092 Anonymous
>>3543088 Don't cry anon.

1 hours later 3543093 Anonymous
>>3543090 *not too busy, obviously. My bad. Looks like I can't stay in a state of extreme genital rigidity for thirty-six hours straight like I'm used too without feeling the repercussions. Even enlightened people and vaginas age, after all.

1 hours later 3543094 Anonymous
>>3543088 You look a lot like my good friend. The weird thing is, I see so many people who look like him. Do you get that a lot? People mistaking you for someone else, or saying you look like someone?

1 hours later 3543095 Anonymous (bc971f60882911e2a07422000a1fab83_7.jpg 612x612 66kB)
Am I /lit/ enough for you guys? Also, I have a welt on my lip because I had an allergic reaction to Bactrim. Can't take sulfadrugs now!

1 hours later 3543097 Anonymous
>>3543094 Yeah, more or less all the time. I guess I've got a pretty fucking generic face.

1 hours later 3543099 Anonymous (1307263836671.jpg 526x300 38kB)
>>3543093 >>3543090

1 hours later 3543100 Anonymous
>>3543095 Don't worry, I have oral herpes as well. My last flare up was last last week and it was the first one I'd had in almost two years. It's not as bad as people make it out to be.

1 hours later 3543101 Anonymous
>>3543095 /lit/ enough for me. Move to Canada.

1 hours later 3543102 Anonymous
>>3543097 I like your face.

1 hours later 3543103 Anonymous
>>3543072 That's interesting. I've always seen myself as Tyrone Slothrop fucking Sarah Silverman while fellating Rimbaud and Subcomandante Marcos.

1 hours later 3543114 Anonymous (url.jpg 731x736 451kB)
>>3543100 Well, I get cold sores too, but that thing could have become this. >Zenkner, now 20, was a victim of one of the most frightening drug side effects you've likely never heard of: Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), a rare but devastating condition where the top layer of skin and mucous membranes, such as those covering the eyes and lips, blisters and peels off in waves. It can even affect the internal organs like the lungs. Some patients go blind. Some wind up with severe scarring. Some patients die. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42501090/ ns/health-health_care/

1 hours later 3543118 Anonymous
>>3543103 Really, sir ? Then you must be of the coloured-cigar enlightened kind. Very rare breed of enlightenment. As an umbrella-skin cold-sun ocean-air enlightened type (common but rarely seen at this level of advancement) I can say I am more than happy to meet you. Any comment about your path of enlightenment ?

1 hours later 3543119 Anonymous
>>3543114 Nice DSLs

1 hours later 3543123 Anonymous
>>3543028 Is this "gingersalmonella"? You'll have to forgive me, please. I haven't been able to access my pseudonymous e-mail account in a week not because I haven't enjoyed talking to you. But in a moment of inspired idiocy, I used a purposely difficult to remember password unlike the one I use for my real e-mail, which I then didn't bother to write down anywhere, simply trusting my browser to save it. After I received your third e-mail, I was browsing the website of a local newspaper and in order to circumvent their paywall, deleted my cache of cookies—which deleted the password saved in the e-mail I had opened up. I'm a deeply sorry for this and was hoping I'd bump into you here again. Also... >and I assumed you were he because I know he's around today, because he has very specific tastes in female authors >because I know he's around today You already might know me better than a lot of people...

1 hours later 3543124 Anonymous
>>3543118 Watch a lot of Norm Macdonald.

2 hours later 3543125 Anonymous
>>3543102 Th-thanks. ... I have to go now. But in all seriousness, I suppose I'm happy with it. Hopefully we'll see it on the back of an actual fucking book sometime next year, the amount of research I had to do for the second section of my novel today was ridiculous. Goddamn burnt out, only reason I'm throwing my face up on the /lit/ board in the first place. Feel like dicking about to get my mind back to reality. Probably just gonna get back to writing instead though. Anyone else working on stuff?

2 hours later 3543127 Anonymous
>>3543124 Interesting. How enlightened is he ?

2 hours later 3543128 Anonymous
>>3543119 >DSLs >Domain Specific Languages? I got trips?

2 hours later 3543130 Anonymous
>>3543128 Dick Sucking Lips babe

2 hours later 3543131 Anonymous
>>3543130 Thanks :D

2 hours later 3543135 Anonymous
>>3543125 I'm working on having the mind-enlightenment process better integrated in the vagina-rejuvenation process of my vagina-caring facility. I'd also like to upgrade to be worthy of the "Dante and Baudelaire having sexual intercourse only through a distant but very loving and yet definitely defiant staring contest." I wonder what Emmy, Marie, Immanuel and Soso will think about that.

2 hours later 3543137 Anonymous
>>3543131 More like ;(|}

2 hours later 3543142 Anonymous
>>3543127 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCRC d0r4ZIQ He transcends the form.

2 hours later 3543144 Anonymous
>>3543123 Yep! Well, ginsengsalmonella. Ginger, ginseng. That makes sense though! I'm not trying to pressure you to reply or anything, I was just fretting a little about maybe saying something really off-putting in the last message. I figured I would see you around again sometime. Your tastes are pretty recognizable - there's few enough people here into Japanese lit, and even fewer who are into it past the most major novelists.

2 hours later 3543157 Anonymous
>>3543135 Maybe if I spent the last eight months reading something other than Infinite Jest I would be able to relate.

2 hours later 3543173 Anonymous
>>3543142 Nice one. I'm not too familiar with the oral enlightenments of Englih so a bit of the salt got past me, but nevertheless. This kind sir happens to have a very enlightened (though not that sexual) face. If I had to place a bet I'd say he could become one of the brick-and-fish enlightened kind (but the good brick-and-fish of course). If you like a subtle humorist (though this one is more a wizard of wordplay) try Raymond Devos. He is dead, unfortunately, and almost as much unfortunately he also happens to be French. So full fluency in French will be required to follow this brilliant bender of language. >>3543157 You should read Dante, then. Start with Vita Nuova. There weren't vagina-caring facility at his time but he sure would have understood theur necessity. Then move on to Cervantes, then Montaigne. At the end of the spiritual journey you should be able to invoke the image and structure of the perfect vagina through pure strenght of focus. But I hope you don't expect to penetrate it right away (even if only mentally) for any vagina should find its matching vagina before meeting the middle strenght of a man.

2 hours later 3543175 Anonymous
>>3543173 >not that sexual Please. I'd fuck Norm.

2 hours later 3543197 Anonymous (525113_10150792607210952_1970285223_n.jpg 329x440 41kB)
hey lit tell me i am hansom plox thanx

2 hours later 3543200 Anonymous
>>3543197 nope sry sage

2 hours later 3543225 Anonymous (433.jpg 400x375 114kB)
>>3543197

3 hours later 3543258 Anonymous
>>3542826 pure coincidence that the camera positioned is so far away i suppose?

3 hours later 3543298 Anonymous
>>3543144 No, nothing off-putting! On the contrary. I was actually overjoyed reading about you, the general kindness that you exuded in your e-mails, and great taste in books. If you're around still, please e-mail me here: mancatbooks@yahoo.com This time I promise to not lose the password!

3.252 0.139