4chan archive /g/ (index)
similar threads
2019-05-25 12:36 71103964 Anonymous (1469216347936.gif 258x303 2kB)
Is Free Software compatible with National Socialism?

0 min later 71103969 Anonymous
>>71103964 no its not

0 min later 71103970 Anonymous
>>71103964 Go the fuck away. >>>/pol/ >>>/dissenter/ >>>/trash/

1 min later 71103982 Anonymous
>>71103964 Communism is not compatible with National Socialism

2 min later 71103986 Anonymous
in the sense that it's a benefit to society, yes, but the gpl might be a little too libre and permissive licences are a little too libertarian f/loss doesn't really do protectionism well

5 min later 71104023 Anonymous
>>71103970 >believing in (((((history))))) kys brainlet, go back to lddit

7 min later 71104032 Anonymous
>>71103969 Why?

7 min later 71104033 Anonymous
Nah we don’t take kindly to discord trannies and antinatalist mgtow feminist types

8 min later 71104042 Anonymous
>>71103982 Free software is not communism. >no it is Show me where.

9 min later 71104055 Anonymous
Free software benefits the people and opposes corporate power while removing migrant tech influence

11 min later 71104078 Anonymous
>>71104055 That sounds pretty fucking compatible to me.

26 min later 71104199 Anonymous
>>71104032 >Political ideology that is fundamentally opposed to the concept of individual freedoms >software built primarily for the purpose of supporting individual freedoms Gee Anon, I dunno.

31 min later 71104238 Anonymous
>>71104199 >Political ideology that is fundamentally opposed to the concept of individual freedoms This meme again.

33 min later 71104253 Anonymous
>>71104042 Programmers owning means of production(compiler, tools etc) is literal communism

33 min later 71104256 Anonymous
If it has socialism in the name, it's compatible with free software.

33 min later 71104257 Anonymous
>>71103964 national socialism is the same as communism so yes

34 min later 71104258 Anonymous
>>71104238 Fascism is antithetical to freedom anon, and natsoc too by extension. You can't be ethical according to the ideology. The state has to be for you. Freedom is an enemy of ethics.

34 min later 71104266 Anonymous
>>71103964 Absolutely, National Socialism and FOSS go hand in hand.

35 min later 71104272 Anonymous
go to hell fucking jew

37 min later 71104285 Anonymous
/pol/ has ruined this board

37 min later 71104288 Anonymous (1534270915521.gif 512x384 2679kB)
>

37 min later 71104290 Anonymous
>>71104253 Free software is not even about "owning the means of production". And even if it were, that's way too little to classify it as "communism". There are people who unironically also believe it's communism just because it advocates sharing. Gee, I didn't know communism invented sharing.

40 min later 71104323 Anonymous (hitler18.jpg 655x518 94kB)
>>71104258 That's exactly what the GPL does. The only things it "restricts" are unethical practices such as closing the source or tivoization. Leave people be, and you get the ultracapitalist proprietary shitshow we have today. Give them guidance, and you have free software and no botnet.

41 min later 71104326 Anonymous
>>71104257 National Socialism is not Marxists socialism. National Socialism is that when means of production are in hands of private owners and workers are represented in company by Unions who are picked by owners of that company. As long as the owners of those companies are right race they do best things for the workers because of the race forces them to use produced surplus to be spend wisely. Marxists socialism is that when means of production are hands of the state which uses workers produced surplus as the workers elected representatives chooses to spend it

42 min later 71104334 Anonymous (1552172228256.png 398x469 201kB)
Isn't it ironic that the proprietary software developers call us communists? We are the ones who have provided for a free market, where they allow only monopoly. … if the users chooses this proprietary software package, he then falls into this monopoly for support … the only way to escape from monopoly is to escape from proprietary software, and that is what the free software movement is all about. We want you to escape and our work is to help you escape. We hope you will escape to the free world.

42 min later 71104338 Anonymous
>>71104290 >Free software is not even about "owning the means of production". It literally is

43 min later 71104340 Anonymous (Microsoft Final Solution.gif 350x350 55kB)
Compatible? With pic related? I think they're trying to make it compatible in order to close down the borders and not let you out of your home country, yes. You're an illegal immigrant if you wish to flee from your tyrannic government. You're not an illegal immigrant, are you? :^)

45 min later 71104353 Anonymous
>>71104253 >Programmers owning means of production(compiler, tools etc) is literal communism Socialism at best.

45 min later 71104355 Anonymous
>>71103964 The Free Software movement was founded by a jew.

45 min later 71104360 Anonymous
>>71104355 Irrelevant. What matters is the actual content of the idea.

45 min later 71104362 Anonymous
>>71104238 So what happens if I don't like Der Fuhrer and want someone else to be in charge instead?

47 min later 71104372 Anonymous
>>71104199 Doing your duty and contributing to the nation's divine repository of superior German craftsmanship sounds very natsoc to me.

47 min later 71104374 Anonymous
>>71104360 Is /pol/ really this hypocrite?

48 min later 71104384 Anonymous
>>71104374 What is hypocrisy?

52 min later 71104425 Anonymous
>>71104372 Then go back to your hun shit hole.

53 min later 71104431 Anonymous
>>71104384 Hypocrisy is a half caste pretending to be a white supremacist.

54 min later 71104438 Anonymous
>>71104431 Who is white?

55 min later 71104452 Anonymous
>>71104362 On this website you'll be put in the same category as these people: https://www.google.com/search?q=cry ing+women+trump+election

55 min later 71104454 Anonymous
>>71104199 GPL is against individual freedom. Public domain is the only thing for personal freedom.

56 min later 71104466 Anonymous
>>71104199 the gpl supports the freedom of society not the individual, that's why you can't sublicence the works of other contributors as an individual and why you must provide the source when you redistribute programs public domain/mit/bsd support individual freedoms >>71104258 >The state has to be for you the gpl has to be enforced through the state using copyright/intellectual property laws and in a libertarian society it'd be a weak contract, it goes hand in hand with a natsoc state >>71104285 no worse than gaymer /v/irgins/chink shill threads/consumerism did

57 min later 71104479 Anonymous
>>71104438 Anyone whose ancestral homeland borders the north sea at some point

58 min later 71104486 Anonymous (Hitler104.jpg 1024x573 102kB)
>>71104466 Well said.

59 min later 71104496 Anonymous
>>71104479 Then are the Portuguese, who originally coined the term, not white?

1 hours later 71104503 Anonymous
>>71104496 Yes. The Portuguese are the same race as the Spanish, who are also not white.

1 hours later 71104505 Anonymous
>>71104285 Just off yourself, you fucking newfag. This kind of thread used to be an innocuous and fun topic with a slightly deranged premise. But people like you make a mountain out of a molehill and now everyone is crying /pol/ instead.

1 hours later 71104507 Anonymous
>>71103964 It depends, if you are meaning to use the benefits of open source, such as no cost, liberty to share, review, and modify the code at free will, it's entirely compatible. I'd encourage the use of open source in critical areas of the administration and production, because if the goal is to archieve autarchy, every factor that could make you dependant of external influences should be minimized. In the other hand, a totalitarian state, would be interested in gaining more control over the population, more control over the population means more control over production factors and therefore the entire economy. In such case, the state would develop a closed source OS for the general population, with a lot of spywares and backdoors at the service of the goverment. >>71104199 You are not taking in consideration the possibility of using open source software to minimize the external influence in the economy. I'd advocate for the possibility of a totalitarian state that uses a fork of linux for technical purposes (i.e stability, compatibility, security), in critical areas of administration and production, and a more limited, simple and intuitive own closed source for the general population (with spyware and backdoors, obviously those are denied).

1 hours later 71104539 Anonymous
>>71104507 It's not open source if it's controlled by the government though, even if it was originally based on open source software. While I take your point on open source being a good way to promote autarky, having the source code for government software available to the general public seems like a pretty severe security risk, especially in a totalitarian state where people are constantly searching for ways around the censors and tracking.

1 hours later 71104563 Anonymous
>>71104326 You just describe some kind of racial corporatism.

1 hours later 71104599 Anonymous
>>71104563 >You just describe some kind of racial corporatism. That is what National Socialism is. Hitler just decided to call it National Socialism. Mussolini described facism correctly corporatism

1 hours later 71104726 Anonymous
>>71104539 >>71104539 >having the source code for government software available to the general public seems like a pretty severe security risk I could write about vulnerabilities and goverment using open source, but i will simply say that it would be the same as NSA using linux, i don't see the point. not considering each bank using linux, not considering neither each Administrative agencies using it for bureaucracy automation. I don't see any flaw in my logic, only if there is evidence of nsa or banks forking linux and not sharing the source code, but even if it were so, reverse engineering of a copy of the system would be easy. >having the source code for government software available to the general public seems like a pretty severe security risk, especially in a totalitarian state where people are constantly searching for ways around the censors and tracking Same avaibility as the other hundreds of distros, maybe even less avaibility, wich would make irrevelevant to decide between glorious nation ubuntu and simply regular ubuntu.

1 hours later 71104745 Anonymous
>>71104726 I know a lot of words but i never learn the real difference between to and for.

1 hours later 71104787 Anonymous
>>71104023 >reality doesn't matter Nice psychosis.

1 hours later 71104809 Anonymous
>>71104726 I think you've misunderstood me somewhat, so I'll try and make it clearer. If big brother uses open source software then the public has access to its source code, creating a security risk. If dai-onisan creates it's own secure fork of the software, then that software is no longer open source. Therefore, open source software and fascism are not compatible.

1 hours later 71104826 Anonymous
>>71104809 Big brother is English socialism, not fascism.

1 hours later 71104849 Anonymous
>>71104253 > individuals owning means of production > communism something doesn't add up here anon.

1 hours later 71104871 Anonymous
>>71104826 Actually the phrase "big brother" is shorthand for any totalitarian government, and is not affected by whatever price of 19th century philosophy is being used as an excuse for enslaving the people.

1 hours later 71104873 Anonymous (GNULAG.jpg 1074x1074 611kB)
>>71103964 No

2.578 0.110