4chan archive /g/ (index)
similar threads
2013-01-26 12:43 31004690 Anonymous (lel.png 1366x768 288kB)
And they say Firefox is better.

2 min later 31004739 Anonymous
>>31004690 It is though.

2 min later 31004752 Anonymous
Anything less than 500 is a failure. Getting 10% and 15% in a test has identical results.

3 min later 31004769 Anonymous
>>31004690 FUCK YOU

6 min later 31004838 Anonymous
>>31004752 No 500 is the most hightest you can score

6 min later 31004848 Anonymous (Untitled-1.png 1920x85 47kB)
krom masturd race

7 min later 31004854 Anonymous
because a shitty benchmark written by a 12 year old decides the browser's quality yes

7 min later 31004857 Anonymous
>>31004769 Someone is mad

7 min later 31004865 Anonymous
>>31004854 >benchmark you stupid, stupid cunt

7 min later 31004871 Anonymous
>>31004823 >>31004762 >>31004664

8 min later 31004879 Anonymous
Oh god. That aliasing on Firefox. And people say text rendering on Chrome is bad.

8 min later 31004889 Anonymous
>>31004879 It's OP fucking up. See >>31004848 for a proper comparison.

9 min later 31004899 Anonymous (FUCK YOU.gif 450x253 2102kB)
>>31004857

9 min later 31004901 Anonymous
>New Girl

9 min later 31004904 Anonymous (ieffvschrome.png 944x440 49kB)
>>31004889 Chrome is just unusable.

9 min later 31004916 Anonymous (1324410210346.png 1138x240 52kB)
>>31004904

10 min later 31004933 Anonymous
>>31004904 funny how the botnet has flash by by default

10 min later 31004936 Anonymous
>>31004933 >botnet Stop being silly.

11 min later 31004950 Anonymous (botnet2.png 1045x580 130kB)
>>31004936

12 min later 31004979 Anonymous
>>31004950 So, by this logic, all ISPs are botnets. Not saying they aren't. Just saying we're all on a botnet right now unless we are our own ISP.

13 min later 31004994 Anonymous
>>31004979 >Implying there's one ISP for the world. >Implying all log data.

14 min later 31005025 Anonymous
>>31004994 >Implying all log data They pretty much have to. How else do they keep track of when you pirate shit? Chances are, if you're using a big ISP, you're part of a botnet.

15 min later 31005037 Anonymous
>>31004916 Now add freetype-infinality

15 min later 31005040 Anonymous
>>31005025 They log all data. This means they have a redundant backup internet they can log to.

16 min later 31005067 Anonymous (shrekerhs.png 122x109 38kB)
>>31004979 >All ISPs are botnets NOW YOU'VE GOT IT!

16 min later 31005068 Anonymous
>>31005025 >keep track of when you pirate shit It suck living in murka eh?

16 min later 31005069 Anonymous
>>31004916 So, text rendering has gotten progressively worse over the years. Great job, MS.

17 min later 31005084 Anonymous (1357260966910.jpg 540x540 42kB)
>>31004690 >implying I care what you think

24 min later 31005232 Anonymous (1355538407481.gif 245x118 447kB)
>>31004950 So that's why chrome is so fast and miles ahead of every other browser.

26 min later 31005295 Anonymous
>>31004690 Newsflash: html5test scores do not indicate ACTUAL html5 support. This shit is the same as the race to think up all sorts of useless new shit back in 1996-8 with Netscape. Tons of new features, all of them full of bugs, with the actual standards implementation being totally different in the end. A lot of things current html5 browsers implement only exist as drafts, for example.

27 min later 31005314 Anonymous
>mfw my phone browser is better than any desktop browser

28 min later 31005330 Anonymous (1326191470260.png 200x175 11kB)
404 opera hmm, I thought firefox > opera in html5 compliance

28 min later 31005335 Anonymous (2013-01-25 19.10.21.png 720x1280 141kB)
>>31005314 forgot pic

31 min later 31005393 Anonymous
Let me know when Chrome gets DirectWrite font rendering, RequestPolicy, and NoScript.

32 min later 31005425 Anonymous
>>31005393 let me know when firefox stops losing users every month

34 min later 31005462 Anonymous
>>31005425 Nice comeback kid.

35 min later 31005484 Anonymous
>>31005425 Userbase quantity does not relate to quality of the browser.Fuck, it seems like nearly every Chrome user I see can't type property, and is an idiot.

37 min later 31005520 Anonymous
>>31005462 thnx, I am sorry that you could not muster anything, but dont worry maybe some day...

39 min later 31005570 Anonymous
Oh because the only thing that makes a browser good is HTML5 compatibility?

42 min later 31005602 Anonymous
>>31005570 HTML5 respects your freedom.

42 min later 31005611 Anonymous
Chrom*'s good.. but does it have quality addons?

44 min later 31005650 Anonymous
>>31005611 quality? you mean bunch of privacy security bullshit that all firefox pedophiles are obsessed with?

44 min later 31005652 Anonymous
HTML5 compatibility ≠ Browser quality /thread

45 min later 31005670 Anonymous
>>31005652 HTML5 compatibility = HTML5 compatibility firefox lost

47 min later 31005701 Anonymous
>>31004690 >new girl I watched 2 episodes and was cringing the entire time, god damn Zooey is a terrible actress.

47 min later 31005707 Anonymous (3ds.jpg 960x1280 150kB)
nintendo can't into browsers

55 min later 31005880 Anonymous (1356635085545.jpg 627x370 68kB)
>implying a number can sum up user experience.

56 min later 31005908 Anonymous
>>31005707 >opera

57 min later 31005918 Anonymous
>>31005707 the vita gets like 27

57 min later 31005920 Anonymous
>>31004904 >Windows

57 min later 31005923 Anonymous
>>31005908 see >>31005330

58 min later 31005931 Anonymous
>>31005707 the WiiU browser actually beats IE though not that its that impressive to beat IE, but still

58 min later 31005937 Anonymous
>>31005931 IE10?

59 min later 31005951 Anonymous
>>31005918 My Vita just got 243 with 2 bonus points

1 hours later 31005971 Anonymous
>>31005707 >mfw browsing on brother's friend's DSi XL >256x192 screens >mobile versions of sites have to wrap >load normal website >"out of memory"

1 hours later 31005980 Anonymous
>>31005937 yes

1 hours later 31005987 Anonymous (lol.png 1228x862 205kB)
>tfw your hipster browser does okay

1 hours later 31005989 Anonymous
>>31005951 >owning a Vita >2011+2

1 hours later 31005990 Anonymous
>>31005937 IE10 only got 320 with 6 bonus

1 hours later 31006005 Anonymous (Screenshot_2013-01-25-21-44-04.png 480x854 95kB)
>>31005335 What? Stock ans Dolphin get the same on mine.

1 hours later 31006013 Anonymous
>>31005989 I love it, I play WipEout 2048 all the time. It's actually a great system

1 hours later 31006021 Anonymous
>>31005335 The test means absolutely nothing

1 hours later 31006024 Anonymous
>>31005951 according to this: http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/01/wii-us -browser-is-better-at-html5-than-interne t-explorer-10-on-pc/ the Vitas browser is ass

1 hours later 31006049 Anonymous (Screen Shot.png 1024x618 50kB)
>>31005918 I'm guessing that was an older version

1 hours later 31006075 Anonymous (2013-01-25-184650.jpg 960x544 84kB)
>>31006024

1 hours later 31006130 Anonymous
>>31006021 Actually, the test means HTML5 compatibility

1 hours later 31006151 Anonymous
>>31006075 That's with outdated system firmware too

1 hours later 31006154 Anonymous
>>31006130 which means nothing because the standard is not a standard or even finished

1 hours later 31006182 Anonymous
>>31006154 Well then it means HTML5 compatibility as compared to current HTML5 functionality

1 hours later 31006256 Anonymous
>>31006151 firmware means nothing

1 hours later 31006281 Anonymous
>>31006256 With the firmware update comes a browser update

1 hours later 31006312 Anonymous
i prefer the user experience in firefox, and the extensions, and the font rendering, and the memory use... and mozilla are just a nice company as long as they both support shit like flexbox (hi IE) it doesn't really matter

1 hours later 31006367 Anonymous
>>31004690 What's wrong with your font rendering?

1 hours later 31006403 Anonymous
>>31004690 >Windows It doesn't matter how good your browser is if your OS is shit.

1 hours later 31006434 Anonymous
>>31006403 typical freetard your loonix is shit

1 hours later 31006464 Anonymous (html5test.jpg 1321x897 212kB)


1 hours later 31006465 Anonymous
>>31006434 >Loonix is shit confirmed for 12 year old who's too scared to give anything new (no matter how much better) a shot

1 hours later 31006486 Anonymous
>>31006434 GNU/Linux and Unix are superior to Windows and everyway shape and form. Yes, this includes OSX.

1 hours later 31006510 Anonymous
>>31006464 >ghostery

1 hours later 31006511 Anonymous (Screenshot_2013-01-25-20-09-41.png 720x1280 140kB)
>>31004690 Desktop browsers confirmed for shit.

1 hours later 31006524 Anonymous
>>31006486 This. Being based on FreeBSD OS X is actually an extremely powerful OS, especially when used properly

1 hours later 31006528 Anonymous
>>31006005 it's dolphin jetpack.

1 hours later 31006544 Anonymous
>>31006524 >based on FreeBSD It has almost nothing in common with it

1 hours later 31006565 Anonymous
>>31006486 Look, someone who's never left the basement.

1 hours later 31006571 Anonymous
>>31006544 Except that Darwin is built upon FreeBSD

1 hours later 31006580 Anonymous
>>31006486 >and Unix My sides, enjoy your proprietary shitware.

1 hours later 31006589 Anonymous
>>31006571 i built ur mom off freebsd lol pwnt

1 hours later 31006614 Anonymous
>>31006589 lelelelel yuo got him XD

1 hours later 31006623 Anonymous
>>31006565 >Look, someone who's never left the basement. Most servers in the world run GNU/Linux. People that have Red Hat certifications are they highest paid in the field. Deal with it, dumbass.

1 hours later 31006628 Anonymous
>>31006571 OSX has almost nothing in common with it

1 hours later 31006637 Anonymous
>>31006623 lol i served ur mom wit gnu linux get wrekt n00b

1 hours later 31006659 Anonymous
>>31006544 >>31006628 NeXTSTEP is based on FreeBSD and OpenBSD. NeXTSTEP became Darwin, wish is the base of OS X >lrn2google

1 hours later 31006677 Anonymous
>>31006659 i based ur mom last nite wit my dik ownd

1 hours later 31006786 Anonymous
>>31006677 dese triple dubs proov my point

1 hours later 31006860 Anonymous (up.png 800x1280 156kB)
Chrome in my nexus 7

1 hours later 31006870 Anonymous (1357233078173.jpg 261x238 21kB)
>>31004690 >implying scores literally actually translate into the real world Chrome is for faggot hipsters. Way too buggy and its "speed" is way overrated. I notice Chrome being slower than Firefox way more often.

1 hours later 31006903 Anonymous
Firefox is better for the reasons that really matter to smart people.

1 hours later 31006911 Anonymous (up.png 800x1280 199kB)
>>31006860 And Firefox in my Nexus 7. WTF is happening here?

1 hours later 31006937 Anonymous
>>31006870 >4gifs.com >.jpg

1 hours later 31006941 Anonymous
>>31006903 This right here. It's why insecure dumbasses prefer Chrome over Firefox 3:1.

1 hours later 31006963 Anonymous
If you nerds actually gave a shit about HTML5 you'd be looking at specific features, not some total meaningless score.

1 hours later 31007023 Anonymous (2013-01-25 17.25.14.png 1440x1280 278kB)
>android stock browser scores higher than android chrome

0.959 0.087