4chan archive /g/ (index)
similar threads
2013-01-26 12:43 31004690 Anonymous (lel.png 1366x768 288kB)
And they say Firefox is better.
2 min later 31004739 Anonymous
>>31004690
It is though.
2 min later 31004752 Anonymous
Anything less than 500 is a failure.
Getting 10% and 15% in a test has identical results.
3 min later 31004769 Anonymous
>>31004690
FUCK YOU
6 min later 31004838 Anonymous
>>31004752
No 500 is the most hightest you can score
6 min later 31004848 Anonymous (Untitled-1.png 1920x85 47kB)
krom masturd race
7 min later 31004854 Anonymous
because a shitty benchmark written by a 12 year old decides the browser's quality
yes
7 min later 31004857 Anonymous
>>31004769
Someone is mad
7 min later 31004865 Anonymous
>>31004854
>benchmark
you stupid, stupid cunt
7 min later 31004871 Anonymous
>>31004823
>>31004762
>>31004664
8 min later 31004879 Anonymous
Oh god. That aliasing on Firefox.
And people say text rendering on Chrome is bad.
8 min later 31004889 Anonymous
>>31004879
It's OP fucking up.
See >>31004848 for a proper comparison.
9 min later 31004899 Anonymous (FUCK YOU.gif 450x253 2102kB)
>>31004857
9 min later 31004901 Anonymous
>New Girl
9 min later 31004904 Anonymous (ieffvschrome.png 944x440 49kB)
>>31004889
Chrome is just unusable.
9 min later 31004916 Anonymous (1324410210346.png 1138x240 52kB)
>>31004904
10 min later 31004933 Anonymous
>>31004904
funny how the botnet has flash by by default
10 min later 31004936 Anonymous
>>31004933
>botnet
Stop being silly.
11 min later 31004950 Anonymous (botnet2.png 1045x580 130kB)
>>31004936
12 min later 31004979 Anonymous
>>31004950
So, by this logic, all ISPs are botnets.
Not saying they aren't. Just saying we're all on a botnet right now unless we are our own ISP.
13 min later 31004994 Anonymous
>>31004979
>Implying there's one ISP for the world.
>Implying all log data.
14 min later 31005025 Anonymous
>>31004994
>Implying all log data
They pretty much have to. How else do they keep track of when you pirate shit?
Chances are, if you're using a big ISP, you're part of a botnet.
15 min later 31005037 Anonymous
>>31004916
Now add freetype-infinality
15 min later 31005040 Anonymous
>>31005025
They log all data. This means they have a redundant backup internet they can log to.
16 min later 31005067 Anonymous (shrekerhs.png 122x109 38kB)
>>31004979
>All ISPs are botnets
NOW YOU'VE GOT IT!
16 min later 31005068 Anonymous
>>31005025
>keep track of when you pirate shit
It suck living in murka eh?
16 min later 31005069 Anonymous
>>31004916
So, text rendering has gotten progressively worse over the years.
Great job, MS.
17 min later 31005084 Anonymous (1357260966910.jpg 540x540 42kB)
>>31004690
>implying I care what you think
24 min later 31005232 Anonymous (1355538407481.gif 245x118 447kB)
>>31004950
So that's why chrome is so fast and miles ahead of every other browser.
26 min later 31005295 Anonymous
>>31004690
Newsflash: html5test scores do not indicate ACTUAL html5 support.
This shit is the same as the race to think up all sorts of useless new shit back in 1996-8 with Netscape. Tons of new features, all of them full of bugs, with the actual standards implementation being totally different in the end.
A lot of things current html5 browsers implement only exist as drafts, for example.
27 min later 31005314 Anonymous
>mfw my phone browser is better than any desktop browser
28 min later 31005330 Anonymous (1326191470260.png 200x175 11kB)
404 opera
hmm, I thought firefox > opera in html5 compliance
28 min later 31005335 Anonymous (2013-01-25 19.10.21.png 720x1280 141kB)
>>31005314
forgot pic
31 min later 31005393 Anonymous
Let me know when Chrome gets DirectWrite font rendering, RequestPolicy, and NoScript.
32 min later 31005425 Anonymous
>>31005393
let me know when firefox stops losing users every month
34 min later 31005462 Anonymous
>>31005425
Nice comeback kid.
35 min later 31005484 Anonymous
>>31005425
Userbase quantity does not relate to quality of the browser.Fuck, it seems like nearly every Chrome user I see can't type property, and is an idiot.
37 min later 31005520 Anonymous
>>31005462
thnx, I am sorry that you could not muster anything, but dont worry maybe some day...
39 min later 31005570 Anonymous
Oh because the only thing that makes a browser good is HTML5 compatibility?
42 min later 31005602 Anonymous
>>31005570
HTML5 respects your freedom.
42 min later 31005611 Anonymous
Chrom*'s good.. but does it have quality addons?
44 min later 31005650 Anonymous
>>31005611
quality? you mean bunch of privacy security bullshit that all firefox pedophiles are obsessed with?
44 min later 31005652 Anonymous
HTML5 compatibility ≠ Browser quality
/thread
45 min later 31005670 Anonymous
>>31005652
HTML5 compatibility = HTML5 compatibility
firefox lost
47 min later 31005701 Anonymous
>>31004690
>new girl
I watched 2 episodes and was cringing the entire time, god damn Zooey is a terrible actress.
47 min later 31005707 Anonymous (3ds.jpg 960x1280 150kB)
nintendo can't into browsers
55 min later 31005880 Anonymous (1356635085545.jpg 627x370 68kB)
>implying a number can sum up user experience.
56 min later 31005908 Anonymous
>>31005707
>opera
57 min later 31005918 Anonymous
>>31005707
the vita gets like 27
57 min later 31005920 Anonymous
>>31004904
>Windows
57 min later 31005923 Anonymous
>>31005908
see
>>31005330
58 min later 31005931 Anonymous
>>31005707
the WiiU browser actually beats IE though
not that its that impressive to beat IE, but still
58 min later 31005937 Anonymous
>>31005931
IE10?
59 min later 31005951 Anonymous
>>31005918
My Vita just got 243 with 2 bonus points
1 hours later 31005971 Anonymous
>>31005707
>mfw browsing on brother's friend's DSi XL
>256x192 screens
>mobile versions of sites have to wrap
>load normal website
>"out of memory"
1 hours later 31005980 Anonymous
>>31005937
yes
1 hours later 31005987 Anonymous (lol.png 1228x862 205kB)
>tfw your hipster browser does okay
1 hours later 31005989 Anonymous
>>31005951
>owning a Vita
>2011+2
1 hours later 31005990 Anonymous
>>31005937
IE10 only got 320 with 6 bonus
1 hours later 31006005 Anonymous (Screenshot_2013-01-25-21-44-04.png 480x854 95kB)
>>31005335
What? Stock ans Dolphin get the same on mine.
1 hours later 31006013 Anonymous
>>31005989
I love it, I play WipEout 2048 all the time. It's actually a great system
1 hours later 31006021 Anonymous
>>31005335
The test means absolutely nothing
1 hours later 31006024 Anonymous
>>31005951
according to this:
http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/01/wii-us -browser-is-better-at-html5-than-interne t-explorer-10-on-pc/
the Vitas browser is ass
1 hours later 31006049 Anonymous (Screen Shot.png 1024x618 50kB)
>>31005918
I'm guessing that was an older version
1 hours later 31006075 Anonymous (2013-01-25-184650.jpg 960x544 84kB)
>>31006024
1 hours later 31006130 Anonymous
>>31006021
Actually, the test means HTML5 compatibility
1 hours later 31006151 Anonymous
>>31006075
That's with outdated system firmware too
1 hours later 31006154 Anonymous
>>31006130
which means nothing because the standard is not a standard or even finished
1 hours later 31006182 Anonymous
>>31006154
Well then it means HTML5 compatibility as compared to current HTML5 functionality
1 hours later 31006256 Anonymous
>>31006151
firmware means nothing
1 hours later 31006281 Anonymous
>>31006256
With the firmware update comes a browser update
1 hours later 31006312 Anonymous
i prefer the user experience in firefox, and the extensions, and the font rendering, and the memory use... and mozilla are just a nice company
as long as they both support shit like flexbox (hi IE) it doesn't really matter
1 hours later 31006367 Anonymous
>>31004690
What's wrong with your font rendering?
1 hours later 31006403 Anonymous
>>31004690
>Windows
It doesn't matter how good your browser is if your OS is shit.
1 hours later 31006434 Anonymous
>>31006403
typical freetard
your loonix is shit
1 hours later 31006464 Anonymous (html5test.jpg 1321x897 212kB)
1 hours later 31006465 Anonymous
>>31006434
>Loonix is shit
confirmed for 12 year old who's too scared to give anything new (no matter how much better) a shot
1 hours later 31006486 Anonymous
>>31006434
GNU/Linux and Unix are superior to Windows and everyway shape and form. Yes, this includes OSX.
1 hours later 31006510 Anonymous
>>31006464
>ghostery
1 hours later 31006511 Anonymous (Screenshot_2013-01-25-20-09-41.png 720x1280 140kB)
>>31004690
Desktop browsers confirmed for shit.
1 hours later 31006524 Anonymous
>>31006486
This. Being based on FreeBSD OS X is actually an extremely powerful OS, especially when used properly
1 hours later 31006528 Anonymous
>>31006005
it's dolphin jetpack.
1 hours later 31006544 Anonymous
>>31006524
>based on FreeBSD
It has almost nothing in common with it
1 hours later 31006565 Anonymous
>>31006486
Look, someone who's never left the basement.
1 hours later 31006571 Anonymous
>>31006544
Except that Darwin is built upon FreeBSD
1 hours later 31006580 Anonymous
>>31006486
>and Unix
My sides, enjoy your proprietary shitware.
1 hours later 31006589 Anonymous
>>31006571
i built ur mom off freebsd lol pwnt
1 hours later 31006614 Anonymous
>>31006589
lelelelel yuo got him XD
1 hours later 31006623 Anonymous
>>31006565
>Look, someone who's never left the basement.
Most servers in the world run GNU/Linux. People that have Red Hat certifications are they highest paid in the field. Deal with it, dumbass.
1 hours later 31006628 Anonymous
>>31006571
OSX has almost nothing in common with it
1 hours later 31006637 Anonymous
>>31006623
lol i served ur mom wit gnu linux
get wrekt n00b
1 hours later 31006659 Anonymous
>>31006544
>>31006628
NeXTSTEP is based on FreeBSD and OpenBSD. NeXTSTEP became Darwin, wish is the base of OS X
>lrn2google
1 hours later 31006677 Anonymous
>>31006659
i based ur mom last nite
wit my dik
ownd
1 hours later 31006786 Anonymous
>>31006677
dese triple dubs proov my point
1 hours later 31006860 Anonymous (up.png 800x1280 156kB)
Chrome in my nexus 7
1 hours later 31006870 Anonymous (1357233078173.jpg 261x238 21kB)
>>31004690
>implying scores literally actually translate into the real world
Chrome is for faggot hipsters. Way too buggy and its "speed" is way overrated. I notice Chrome being slower than Firefox way more often.
1 hours later 31006903 Anonymous
Firefox is better for the reasons that really matter to smart people.
1 hours later 31006911 Anonymous (up.png 800x1280 199kB)
>>31006860
And Firefox in my Nexus 7. WTF is happening here?
1 hours later 31006937 Anonymous
>>31006870
>4gifs.com
>.jpg
1 hours later 31006941 Anonymous
>>31006903
This right here. It's why insecure dumbasses prefer Chrome over Firefox 3:1.
1 hours later 31006963 Anonymous
If you nerds actually gave a shit about HTML5 you'd be looking at specific features, not some total meaningless score.
1 hours later 31007023 Anonymous (2013-01-25 17.25.14.png 1440x1280 278kB)
>android stock browser scores higher than android chrome
0.959 0.087