4chan archive /g/ (index)
2012-10-02 05:42 28006528 seriously, guys. C++11 compiler (CXX.jpg 1280x1024 481kB)
which compiler are you supposed to use if you just wanna learn to use the new C++11 features? I'm so fucking tired of the gcc's bullshit and their endless fights about how to optimize everything to shit

2 min later 28006564 Anonymous
>>28006528 gcc

2 min later 28006566 Anonymous
What do you mean with "endless fights about how to optimize everything to shit"? GCC 4.7.x has quite nice C++11 support.

10 min later 28006735 Anonymous
>>28006566 > What do you mean with "endless fights about how to optimize everything to shit"? read their mailing lists ... you'll be amazed >GCC 4.7.x has quite nice C++11 support. no, it doesn't Concurrency Sequence points N2239 No Atomic operations N2427 Yes Strong Compare and Exchange N2748 No Bidirectional Fences N2752 No Memory model N2429 No Data-dependency ordering: atomics and memory model N2664 No Propagating exceptions N2179 Yes Abandoning a process and at_quick_exit N2440 No Allow atomics use in signal handlers N2547 No Thread-local storage N2659 No Dynamic initialization and destruction with concurrency N2660 No

15 min later 28006819 Anonymous
>>28006735 >read their mailing lists And what exactly am I supposed to be looking for? If you want to point out something, post a direct link. For your original question, have you tried clang?

20 min later 28006915 Anonymous
>>28006819 if you care just go and google it i can't spoonfeed you everything all the time

21 min later 28006926 Anonymous
>>28006819 clang is a bit better but it's still lacking key features

22 min later 28006940 Anonymous
Just wait on C++11, no one implements all the features of a new version of C and C++ right away. It's not like your shitty python where they just throw new features out willy-nilly every few months that breaks everything in existence. Updating REAL languages takes time.

25 min later 28006983 Anonymous
>>28006915 >google it "It"? Google what? "how to optimize everything to shit" doesn't return anything useful.

41 min later 28007245 Anonymous
>>28006940 >Updating REAL languages takes time. i just don't know why they can't write a shit compiler for that "REAL languages" implementing new features wouldn't be so hard if they weren't so obsessed with optimization all the time

42 min later 28007275 Anonymous
>>28006983 > "It"? Google what? your mothers vagina? maps.google.com

43 min later 28007300 Anonymous
>ITT: Hurr I just made up an excuse to bash GCC again and promote LLVM+CLang We have these threads every fucking day OP. Fuck off.

44 min later 28007312 Anonymous
>>28006528 >I'm so fucking tired of the gcc's bullshit and their endless fights about how to optimize everything to shit I take it this is why it's taking gcc so long to standardize C++11's features? Makes sense. A good compiler is extremely optimized.

45 min later 28007320 Anonymous
>>28007245 With that way of thinking, perhaps Java or other similar toy languages would be more suited to you.

0.924 0.078