4chan archive /g/ (index)
2012-10-02 05:42 28006528 seriously, guys. C++11 compiler (CXX.jpg 1280x1024 481kB)
which compiler are you supposed to use if you just wanna learn to use the new C++11 features?
I'm so fucking tired of the gcc's bullshit and their endless fights about how to optimize everything to shit
2 min later 28006564 Anonymous
>>28006528
gcc
2 min later 28006566 Anonymous
What do you mean with "endless fights about how to optimize everything to shit"? GCC 4.7.x has quite nice C++11 support.
10 min later 28006735 Anonymous
>>28006566
> What do you mean with "endless fights about how to optimize everything to shit"?
read their mailing lists ... you'll be amazed
>GCC 4.7.x has quite nice C++11 support.
no, it doesn't
Concurrency
Sequence points N2239 No
Atomic operations N2427 Yes
Strong Compare and Exchange N2748 No
Bidirectional Fences N2752 No
Memory model N2429 No
Data-dependency ordering: atomics and memory model N2664 No
Propagating exceptions N2179 Yes
Abandoning a process and at_quick_exit N2440 No
Allow atomics use in signal handlers N2547 No
Thread-local storage N2659 No
Dynamic initialization and destruction with concurrency N2660 No
15 min later 28006819 Anonymous
>>28006735
>read their mailing lists
And what exactly am I supposed to be looking for? If you want to point out something, post a direct link.
For your original question, have you tried clang?
20 min later 28006915 Anonymous
>>28006819
if you care just go and google it
i can't spoonfeed you everything all the time
21 min later 28006926 Anonymous
>>28006819
clang is a bit better but it's still lacking key features
22 min later 28006940 Anonymous
Just wait on C++11, no one implements all the features of a new version of C and C++ right away. It's not like your shitty python where they just throw new features out willy-nilly every few months that breaks everything in existence.
Updating REAL languages takes time.
25 min later 28006983 Anonymous
>>28006915
>google it
"It"? Google what? "how to optimize everything to shit" doesn't return anything useful.
41 min later 28007245 Anonymous
>>28006940
>Updating REAL languages takes time.
i just don't know why they can't write a shit compiler for that "REAL languages"
implementing new features wouldn't be so hard if they weren't so obsessed with optimization all the time
42 min later 28007275 Anonymous
>>28006983
> "It"? Google what?
your mothers vagina?
maps.google.com
43 min later 28007300 Anonymous
>ITT: Hurr I just made up an excuse to bash GCC again and promote LLVM+CLang
We have these threads every fucking day OP. Fuck off.
44 min later 28007312 Anonymous
>>28006528
>I'm so fucking tired of the gcc's bullshit and their endless fights about how to optimize everything to shit
I take it this is why it's taking gcc so long to standardize C++11's features? Makes sense. A good compiler is extremely optimized.
45 min later 28007320 Anonymous
>>28007245
With that way of thinking, perhaps Java or other similar toy languages would be more suited to you.
0.924 0.078