4chan archive /biz/ (index)
similar threads
2021-01-18 03:19 26153611 Anonymous (bummer.png 1618x860 293kB)
LINK is the best perf... uh wait, have you guys been lying this whole time?

2 min later 26153701 Anonymous
>>26153611 You are comparing All time ROI you midwit. LINK has been the best performing asset since July 2018. That's 2.5 years.

4 min later 26153749 Anonymous
>>26153701 > Let's just look at this arbitrary timeframe Lol

5 min later 26153781 Anonymous (1610120357888.png 798x871 62kB)
Ohnonono is this real Linkbros?

6 min later 26153797 Anonymous
>>26153749 It didn’t even exist prior to late 2017 how retarded are you

6 min later 26153800 Anonymous
>>26153749 That means that LINK was the only asset which made you any serious money during the bear market. Seethe

7 min later 26153837 Anonymous
its over

8 min later 26153866 Anonymous
>>26153797 You're the one retarded. The graph starts at inception for all 3 assets, no arbitrary start date. That's all

9 min later 26153883 Anonymous
>>26153611 >link dumps >Chainlink is too risky NOT to hold >link pumps >uhh hurrdurr link is underperforming Nice one Ben.

10 min later 26153924 Anonymous
>>26153800 How does Tesla compare to link over the same period?

10 min later 26153927 Anonymous (brainlet bike.png 539x455 155kB)
>>26153611 >since inception

13 min later 26154032 Anonymous
>>26153611 Also, Bitcoin is about 600 days older than the 3,800 days suggested in your pic. Meanwhile Link's chart shows the correct age of 1,200 days. I call shenanigans.

13 min later 26154039 Anonymous
>>26153800 That means that link mainly underperformed btc and eth since inception. Btc went through bear period during the same time frame as well cope

14 min later 26154050 Anonymous
>>26153611 that must be the dumbest chart ever. >company x that exists 100 years outperforms company y that exists 25 years well yeah, no shit

15 min later 26154108 Anonymous (VD09afj.jpg 645x729 65kB)
>>26154039 >since inception

16 min later 26154128 Anonymous (duherrg.png 559x448 74kB)
>>26154050 > I can't read a chart Actual state of biz

17 min later 26154167 Anonymous
>>26153866 Exactly, you fucking moron. You either need to use the same time frame or not be retarded. LINK did that in a bear market. Show me ETH and BTC starting in any bear market. I can tell you’ve never had to work a high level job before since you don’t understand basic principles of comparison. How is bagging groceries going for you?

18 min later 26154226 Anonymous
>>26154039 Nice mental gymnastics. LINK is up ~4500% against BTC since inception and up ~18000% against ETH, even after dropping 70%. Cope seethe and dilate. >>26153924 TSLA is up 1400% during the same timeframe. LINK is up 11000%

18 min later 26154238 Anonymous
>>26154108 Yes, that is a fair way of measuring performances, what are you on about? Maybe upgrade to a soijak for your next empty reply

19 min later 26154267 Anonymous
>>26153611 Imagine being here and not owning all 3 of them.

20 min later 26154274 Anonymous
>>26154238 >Yes, that is a fair way of measuring performances It's really not. Just for absolute starters: general economic circumstances in 2009 were very different from those in 2017, obviously.

21 min later 26154325 Anonymous (461.png 571x457 8kB)
>>26154238 >Maybe upgrade to a soijak for your next empty reply

21 min later 26154329 Anonymous
>>26154167 You're the unable of any abstract thought. Btc created its bear and bull Market. Measuring since inception is fair, Link created its bull market in the same period relatively, it just wasn't as good as bitcoin early bull. COPE

27 min later 26154526 Anonymous
>>26154329 If you put all your BTC into Link at the Chainlink ICO (Sept. 2017), you'd be 23 times richer now.

28 min later 26154571 Anonymous
>>26154329 BTC all time ROI is 6,500,000%. It's literally the best performing asset in history you massive moron, yet ETH managed to outperform it during the last cycle. Your point is absolutely retarded.

29 min later 26154604 Anonymous
>>26154274 Don't care about general economics lol. Bitcoin was a revolution, created its economic context, your replies only shows link did not, as you need btc's bull as an old man needs a crutch

29 min later 26154624 Anonymous
>>26153749 yeah for real, why shouldn't you look at a coin's ROI before it even existed? Makes perfect sense, right?

30 min later 26154658 Anonymous
>>26154329 You are legit retarded I don’t need abstract thought when the facts are staring me in the face. You are the one coping by comparing 10 years of an asset to 3 years of another one on completely different timelines as if they exist in different universes. They don’t, and you’re a poorfag who didn’t get in early on LINK while I am a multi-millionaire because I bought instead of making bullshit charts to help me cope. See ya.

30 min later 26154664 Anonymous
>>26154604 >Bitcoin was a revolution Hey that's great, put that on a t-shirt or something if it makes you feel better.

32 min later 26154741 Anonymous (images (2).png 211x239 3kB)
>>26154658 >can't read a chart >gets frustrated midwit confirmed

34 min later 26154808 Anonymous
>>26154128 >>26154741 Hi OP.

36 min later 26154849 Anonymous (1574638699409.gif 284x250 629kB)
>>26153611 That doesn't look bad at all. Link is performing as well as ETH did when it got started. If anything I would've expected Link to perform worse due to diminishing returns for the entire crypto market. But it's actually exceeding that.

36 min later 26154862 Anonymous
>>26154658 Cope and seethe, linktard

36 min later 26154868 Anonymous (1595185351740 (2).png 860x602 156kB)
I don't feel so good bros

38 min later 26154941 Anonymous
>>26154849 Yep, not bad I agree. It's just not the best performing asset is all. But linkies can't into nuances

39 min later 26154973 Anonymous
>>26154167 >LINK did that in a bear market. That's not a good thing if it's just the some of the shit people moved to temporarily to avoid bitcoin losses.

42 min later 26155094 Anonymous
>>26153611 This chart shows Chainlink's ROI since 20 cents lmao. Guess what, the ICO price was 10 cents. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH And again: Bitcoin is 600 days older than that chart shows. You chopped off the first 1.5 years when it was less than 10 cents.

43 min later 26155111 Anonymous
OP doesn't even deserve an explanation for why such a comparison is retarded. just ignore

43 min later 26155123 Anonymous
>>26154941 Best performing asset since inception is BTC and nothing will beat that. But Link I think is still exceptionally good. If you draw that chart with all the other shitcoins they'd be plummeting as they all got dumped

43 min later 26155131 Anonymous
Haha, I guess truth hurts. Link marines on suicide watch

43 min later 26155137 Anonymous
>>26154849 To be fair that's a log chart and movement in the lower part of a log chart is extremely tiny in absolute terms e.g. movement from $0.01 to $1 would be the same size as movement from $10,000 to $1,000,000.

45 min later 26155203 Anonymous
>>26155123 Fair enough

46 min later 26155247 Anonymous
>>26155123 Le economics context. Opinion disregarded

47 min later 26155260 Anonymous
>>26155203 >>26155247 OP forgot to switch IDs.

48 min later 26155310 Anonymous
>>26155260 Why?

48 min later 26155331 Anonymous
>>26153611 You had 3 years

49 min later 26155352 Anonymous
>>26155247 oh ok, was meant for >>26155111

51 min later 26155441 Anonymous
>>26153611 interesting post OP, although i wouldnt use it as LINK FUD. all it says to me is that all 3 of those were great investments. dont why so many people here are getting emotionally involved or why they think "since inception" is a bad metric

52 min later 26155452 Anonymous
I cant believe I share a board with so many brainlets. The chart is bullish as fuck for link.

52 min later 26155471 Anonymous
>>26155352 >>26155310 It’s time to see >>26155094 and stop posting.

54 min later 26155522 Anonymous
>>26155441 thanks, yeah I mean I did not expect the thread to be like that

57 min later 26155640 Anonymous
the fud is getting weird

58 min later 26155696 Anonymous
>>26155441 >why they think "since inception" is a bad metric Because it's useless mental masturbation. Other than that, OP manipulated the numbers to hell and back; see >>26155094

59 min later 26155737 Anonymous (1609798074599.jpg 1014x775 132kB)
Lets get last years ROI. Awfully quiet here non Hexicans

1 hours later 26155764 Anonymous (F539301A-5FF0-4BBC-B0EF-467E6F147F84.jpg 800x450 45kB)
>>26154973 >That's not a good thing if it's just the some of the shit people moved to temporarily to avoid bitcoin losses. The absolute state of the fucking board

1 hours later 26155769 Anonymous
>>26155640 it unironically means the product is solid af I’ve been here for 3 years and have slowly watched the fud be legit concerns of progress / mainnet, breadcrumbs fall apart to now “hurr durr on this manipulated graph where I choose figures, it hasn’t outperformed btc over its lifetime in the past three years It literally means we made it and you just have to sit back and watch. The fud isn’t really even fud anymore

1 hours later 26155776 Anonymous
>>26155441 >or why they think "since inception" is a bad metric It’s like an over-the-hill boxer you just KO’d in round 1 crying about how he’d kick your ass if he were 15 years younger.

1 hours later 26155806 Anonymous
>>26153749 >Lol

1 hours later 26155831 Anonymous
>Buying the first ever cryptocurrency, disrupting the global financial system as we know it, had a bigger upside in its first 3 years than an erc-20 token created almost 10 years later Incredible finding OP, simply incredible

1 hours later 26155855 Anonymous
>>26155696 >Because it's useless mental masturbation. its as viable as any other chart. Also, you aren't very intelligent if you think using ICO price as 11 cents rather than 20 cents (how do you know they used 20 cents btw?) is going to make a difference on a LOGARITHMIC CHART

1 hours later 26155874 Anonymous
>>26155831 well you say that, but look at the replies, it does not seem obvious to everyone her

1 hours later 26155993 Anonymous
>>26155855 >its as viable as any other chart. If you want to mentally masturbate, sure. >you aren't very intelligent if you think using ICO price as 11 cents rather than 20 cents is going to make a difference on a LOGARITHMIC CHART Anon, the chart shows Link at a 100x ROI. In reality it's at 200x. >(how do you know they used 20 cents btw?) oh boy

1 hours later 26156010 Anonymous
My only concern is while literally every other coin is blowing up right now, LINK is just kind of staying where its at.

1 hours later 26156028 Anonymous
>>26155874 It is very obvious to literally everyone. But it doesn't change what happened since Link appeared.

1 hours later 26156222 Anonymous
>>26156010 Within the past 2 weeks it’s 2x’d, why is everyone here so impatiently greedy

1 hours later 26156309 Anonymous (howdologchartswork.png 1594x1092 292kB)
>>26155993 >Anon, the chart shows Link at a 100x ROI. >In reality it's at 200x. You don't understand how logarithmic charts work. Look at my pic related. If he used 11 cents as a starting basis rather than 20 cents (you still never explained how you "knew" he used these numbers) the chart would have LINKs price at the X. that would be gains of 10^2.3 rather than the current 10^2. You really should not argue about charts if you cannot comprehend logarithms. >If you want to mentally masturbate, sure. thats literally all we fo here anyway

1 hours later 26156357 Anonymous
>>26156309 >the chart would have LINKs price at the X Anon, the entire chart would move up, over the entirety of Link's timeline. >you still never explained how you "knew" he used these numbers I literally told you in my previous post. >thats literally all we fo here anyway Welllll we're mostly here to make money.

1 hours later 26156455 Anonymous
>>26156357 >I literally told you in my previous post. you didnt explain it anywhere >Anon, the entire chart would move up, over the entirety of Link's timeline. Not how logarithmic charts work. And I know in the 90 seconds since I posted my image to your response that you did not bother in the slightest to learn how logarithms work.

1 hours later 26156458 Anonymous
>>26153866 You’re a fucking airhead The absolute state of LINK fud

1 hours later 26156666 Anonymous
>>26156455 >you didnt explain it anywhere I literally did. It shows Link with an ROI of 100; and if you divide the current price by 100 you get 20 cents. >Not how logarithmic charts work. Except that's exactly how they work. You showed it yourself: you raised the last data point for Link from 10^2 to 10^2.3. You just have to do that along the entire length of the chart.

1 hours later 26156762 Anonymous
>>26153611 It literally just overtook ethereum in performance. WTF are you complaining about? That it doesn't outperform the literal technological paradigm shifting first blockchain ever created? Retard. Sage

1 hours later 26156816 Anonymous
>>26153611 I haven't seen such a bullish Link chart in 3 years. Thanks for the hopium OP.

1 hours later 26156826 Anonymous
>>26156666 CHEEEEECKED

1 hours later 26156882 Anonymous
>>26156762 Thank you for confirming that BTC was the paradigm shift and is the best performing asset the World has ever known. That is all. Link is cute though

1 hours later 26156989 Anonymous
>>26156882 >BTC was the paradigm shift and is the best performing asset the World has ever known You make it seem like anybody ever disputed this lmao. This is what maxipads are reduced to: begging for kudos.

1 hours later 26156993 Anonymous
LINK is mana

1 hours later 26157064 Anonymous
>>26156989 Well you're all crying because I showed it with a graph in my OP. Don't know what to tell you

1 hours later 26157069 Anonymous
>>26156666 actually yes youre correct on both accounts. mybad anon. LINK would still be "under-performing" BTCs early days if it were shifted upward though

1 hours later 26157134 Anonymous
>>26157064 Yeah, I'm sure crying about Link outperforming BTC 23x since its inception lmao. >>26157069 Don't forget OP chopped about 1.5 years off the BTC timeline.

1 hours later 26157836 Anonymous
I love that OP fudged the chart to make the worst case and still he only went to show that link being in that category and keeping up is tremendously bullish. Thanks for the hopium OP

1 hours later 26157841 Anonymous
So, BTC is king? Big news

2 hours later 26157956 Anonymous
>>26157134 I real comparison with all bitcoin days and proper starting price of link would be nice to see. Since OP brought if up he should at least make us a real numbers one. He wont though because it will make things worse for his shit fud

2 hours later 26158021 Anonymous
>>26157956 Not my chart, took it from a twitter guy, not sure if I can post his handle here though

2 hours later 26158176 Anonymous
>>26153800 >let’s just compare 3 bullish years with 3 bearish years Lol

2 hours later 26158216 Anonymous
>>26158176 meant to reply to >>26153749

2 hours later 26158263 Anonymous
>>26158021 its intothecryptoverse's chart from his latest chainlink video on youtube

2 hours later 26158321 Anonymous
>>26158263 Correct

2 hours later 26158324 Anonymous
>>26155764 Not wrong though. Only an idiot would try to optimize investing around a bad year.

2 hours later 26158446 Anonymous
A lot of people will drop this and buy it back and drop this again and buy it back, it takes only small dump for this sort of cringe. You'd think everyone on /biz/ has a link stack, but 20% will hold through the years. And me too, I'm holding my 20 Links because I believe in them and because stacking more will eventually afford me an apartment

2 hours later 26158786 Anonymous
Inception came out in 2010 you fucking retard, ETH wasn't even a thing back then, let alone LINK state of /biz/

2 hours later 26159088 Anonymous
>>26158786 Now you can't be serious

1.033 0.095