4chan archive /biz/ (index)
similar threads
2021-01-17 11:12 26124847 Anonymous (1590423430894.jpg 1405x1987 303kB)
Realistically speaking, can LINK hit $1000 end of 2021?

0 min later 26124857 Anonymous
Maybe

1 min later 26124884 Anonymous
>>26124847 yes

1 min later 26124902 Anonymous
>>26124847 It can for sure, but its still rather unlikely for this cycle.

1 min later 26124905 Anonymous
>>26124847 no

1 min later 26124912 Anonymous
>>26124847 no doubt

1 min later 26124913 Anonymous
>>26124847 I don't know

2 min later 26124947 Anonymous
It needs to x50, so maybe. It depends on what gets announced or released

2 min later 26124950 Anonymous
>>26124847 Can you repeat the question?

3 min later 26124998 Anonymous
>>26124847 retarded question thanks for proving biz is good for nothing retards

4 min later 26125039 Anonymous
>>26124847 Hardly

8 min later 26125188 Anonymous
>>26124847 no, its mathematically impossible

12 min later 26125361 Anonymous
BTC would have to go to like 500k.

13 min later 26125403 Anonymous
>>26124950 >Can you repeat the question? you're not the boss of me now

15 min later 26125445 Anonymous
>>26124847 no

16 min later 26125510 Anonymous (1596535395348.png 840x713 277kB)
>>26124847 no, 2021 ceiling is $250

16 min later 26125514 Anonymous
Try 80,000

18 min later 26125564 Anonymous
>>26124847 Source?

19 min later 26125611 Anonymous
>>26125564 /biz/

19 min later 26125613 Anonymous
>>26124847 No, just look at market cap and how much more money need to go in. If you want a safe X10, look at RBC.

21 min later 26125669 Anonymous
>>26124847 the probability is extremely low

23 min later 26125763 Anonymous
>>26125611 N

25 min later 26125843 Anonymous
Bros can link still 10x from here? If so when?

25 min later 26125854 Anonymous
yes, fair link value is at 350k satoshi, with service agreements one million satoshi at least

27 min later 26125913 Anonymous
>>26124847 Link won’t hit 50$ by EOY

34 min later 26126215 Anonymous
>>26125843 no you fucking idiot not in your wildest semen drenched moonboy pipedreams it has mooned and its gonna crash hard when all the NEETs sell off

36 min later 26126306 Anonymous (1610593391754.png 1023x813 354kB)
>>26124847

37 min later 26126338 Anonymous
>>26125564 imagine jacking off to cartoon children

50 min later 26126815 Anonymous
>>26126338 >>26125611 Source?

52 min later 26126898 Anonymous
>>26124847 Chainlink only needs to do a 50x to hit $1000.

1 hours later 26127298 Anonymous
>>26126898 it would need to moon harder than any asset in history, double BTC's entire 12 year cycle to get that high It's not happening

1 hours later 26127345 Anonymous
>>26125514 That's fud.

1 hours later 26127388 Anonymous
>>26127298 Cope. It is happening and you will miss out.

1 hours later 26127402 Anonymous
>>26125361 That implies link wouldn’t have performed well during the btc bear market.

1 hours later 26127831 Anonymous
>>26126338 imagine being a christcuck moral/poor fag

1 hours later 26127908 Anonymous
easily, with normie fomo

1 hours later 26127975 Anonymous
>>26125361 Jesus christ you're retarded No one cares about the speculative value. Link will function on its own accord once the network is live

1 hours later 26127978 Anonymous
>>26124847 fuck no lmao.

1 hours later 26127982 Anonymous
>>26127298 What the hell are you talking about, Bitcoin did over a million x

1 hours later 26128022 Anonymous
>>26127298 >double BTC BTC was 6 cents in 2010. LINK going from 10 cents to $1000 isn’t even close to BTC going from 6 cents to $40000

1 hours later 26128085 Anonymous (AF45752A-7A32-4083-B22D-630E857F7113.jpg 1004x1280 172kB)
>>26126306 I said delete this immediately anon

1 hours later 26128512 Anonymous
>>26126338 don't gotta imagine

1 hours later 26128607 Anonymous
>>26128022 Right - & BTC did that in 10 years. Sure, in 10 years there's a good chance link void hit 1000, but this year? It's just not going to happen

1 hours later 26128642 annon2
>>26124847 i believe it can, go for it anon!

1 hours later 26128682 Anonymous (LINK_MAGA.jpg 900x900 89kB)
>>26124902 i fart on ur face >>26124905 idiot >>26124857 >>26124913 grow a spine you two >>26124950 faglord learn 2 read >>26124998 ayy lmao >>26125039 moron >>26125188 eat shit and poop it out and eat it again >>26125361 wrong >>26125445 idiot >>26125510 wrong but nice meme >>26125514 nice >>26125564 go back to the R word website >>26125613 idiot >>26125669 your mom's sexual value is extremely low >>26125763 nice try but not the right thread >>26125843 of course retard >>26125854 sounds good >>26125913 idiot >>26126215 eat a penis then fart it out and eat it again >>26126306 didn't even look at the image not worth my time >>26126898 yup >>26127298 wrong >>26127975 this guy gets it >>26127978 idiot >>26127982 and chainlink will do a billion x >>26128085 good advice >>26128512 seek therapy

1 hours later 26128734 Anonymous
>>26128682 u good bro?

1 hours later 26128809 Chronos
>>26128682 So what's your point?

1 hours later 26128810 Anonymous
>>26128682 Get off your meds

1 hours later 26128816 Anonymous
>tell stinkies it's not going to happen >they throw a fit

1 hours later 26128933 Anonymous (1602158459262.jpg 1920x1080 297kB)
>>26124847 No, but it will absolutely be triple digits EOY.

1 hours later 26129002 Anonymous
>>26126306 Can someone kindly explain this to a brainlet?

1 hours later 26129104 Anonymous
>>26128022 But it took 11 years for BTC to do that kek no way link does it in 4

1 hours later 26129130 Anonymous
>>26128642 I second this. U never know, go for it.

1 hours later 26129189 Anonymous
>>26128933 Explain plss??? curious on thought process

1 hours later 26129233 Anonymous
>>26129104 It did not take 11 years for btc to hit 1k.

2 hours later 26129729 Anonymous
>>26127831 Denying Christ is worse than not investing in Link at 10 cents. You will miss out entirely on the true singularity of eternal life. >He chose temporary worldly gains and pleasures over forgiveness and eternity. Goodbye anon we will miss you.

2 hours later 26129746 Anonymous
>>26124847 Probably not but who knows?

2 hours later 26129800 Anonymous
>>26129729 coping mechanism to deal with the realization on your own mortality

2 hours later 26129821 Anonymous (1610524076963.png 1000x1154 761kB)
>>26129002 Even if a smart contract blockchain is decentralized and trustless, ie not controllable by any single entity, it's still only a tool that does what the user decides it does, and what it does depends on the data it is given. If the data it is being given is from a centralized source, that source can control the outcome simply by controlling the input, without even needing to control the output. LINK decentralizes the data input so that no single entity can control the input to the blockchain, thus insuring the output and input of the transaction is decentralized and trustless. If you want the technical explanation of how it actually achieves this, you'll have to un-brainlet yourself first, but know that it is quite literally the "link" between the blockchain and real world data. It enables the global cloud computing power already currently running across all of the cryptosphere to become a tool of mass processing power to calculate real world problems and provide concrete value as a tool, without any ability for any party anywhere to tamper with the results or input to it. For a brainlet example, if employee works X hours or provides X completed by a set deadline, pay X employee Y per hours logged, or Y per salaried contract. The employer is not able to dispute the mathematical truth of the employee having accomplished what was in the contract they both signed up for, nor is the employee able to get paid for not completing the contract. This is a simple example to start with, but you can expand it outwards to encompass any and all transactions that occur anywhere, for any reason, or any amount. If it is a transaction that is at all critical to any party on any level, it enables them to both lock themselves into a binding contract that does not rely on any other entity besides those two parties to ensure that safety and validity of that transaction. If that sounds revolutionary and like a network that will be worth billions, it's because it is.

2 hours later 26129862 Anonymous
>>26129729 True

2 hours later 26129897 Anonymous
>>26124847 Yes but there are so much easier ways to 500x than hope this coin will become the largest in the world by market cap

2 hours later 26129945 Anonymous
>>26124847 If it's possible for BTC to hit $100k, then LINK will hit $1k along side it

2 hours later 26129988 Anonymous
>>26129897 You're saying it as if only LINK will rise and the others will stay the same. Dumbass, all coins will hit stupid highs EOY.

2 hours later 26130277 Anonymous
>>26129988 This. The golden bull is GOLDEN. It will pull everything with a modicum of market share with it to new highs, just like last time.

2 hours later 26130459 Anonymous
>>26125613 Note taken.

2 hours later 26130507 Anonymous
>>26129897 >500x ur dumb as shit

2 hours later 26130545 Anonymous
probably not, but it almost assuredly will by 2023/2024

3.352 0.093