4chan archive /adv/ (index)
2020-03-18 07:38 22003363 Anonymous Dealing with being circumcised (1524993816677.jpg 750x422 51kB)
I was circumcised at birth like pretty much every other white American, and I never knew how shitty it'd prove to be. Last night I had sex with a girl I was really attracted to and couldn't get off until she blew me an hour later. This has happened before. Yeah, I was wearing a condom during the full-on sex, but I have trouble getting off when I don't wear one too. We had sex when we woke up this morning, and the same thing happened, I couldn't get off. What am I supposed to do to cope with this? I've never had a relationship that's lasted longer than a month, so I'm worried that when I have a long-term girlfriend, she's going to take it personally that I'm just not sensitive enough to get off a lot of the time. Or that I might not be able to meet her needs if I'd rather just not have sex than fuck for a half an hour without getting off. On an even bigger scale, how am I supposed to have kids if I can't even cum inside someone I'm turned on by? I really hate circumcision and anyone who supports it. I just want to be able to enjoy sex like I'm supposed to.

7 min later 22003384 Anonymous
Were you the guy in the GIOYC thread a day or two ago? Just start restoring, problem solved

7 min later 22003386 Anonymous
Bump, I know that feel

11 min later 22003400 Anonymous
>>22003384 Can't say I was. And doesn't that take, like, ten years?

17 min later 22003417 Anonymous
>>22003400 No. The biggest change is called "keratinization", which is when skin covers the tip of your dick most of the time and restores the sensitivity, which can take less than a year if you have a decent amount of skin left. But even if it takes longer, it should be worth it. The restoring methods are all really easy and you can put on music or a video, it's like stretching and you don't even notice after a while. I would say give it an attempt, you will see progress in a year at most if you do it right, and you could even be done.

1 hours later 22003576 Anonymous
>>22003363 Like the overwhelming majority of circumcised men, I have never found it to be a barrier to sexual performance, pleasure or satisfaction. Find another excuse.

1 hours later 22003582 Anonymous
>>22003576 >I don't care about being mutilated without choice at birth therefore you shouldn't care either

1 hours later 22003599 Anonymous (D68F4820-7742-4FDA-A623-E2080C0D598B.png 680x415 450kB)
>>22003582

1 hours later 22003632 Anonymous
>>22003599 why even bother posting man?

1 hours later 22003633 Anonymous
>>22003632 I could ask you the same question, but I won’t.

3 hours later 22003849 Anonymous
>>22003576 I gotta agree with this guy. I don't know what your issue is OP

4 hours later 22003891 Anonymous
Who tf told you this was a circumcision thing? My first few times having sex, I couldn't even go 5 mins without nutting uncontrollably. Also, I got circumcized at 15. By that time I was already jerking off daily to porn. There's literally zero changes in pleasure. There is a slight change in sensitivity but not the pleasurable type.

4 hours later 22003900 Anonymous
>>22003891 its just a psyops by a mentally deranged autist who thinks hes making ppl with circumcised people feel bad about themselves so they'll end up joining pol and blaming the jews. my take on it.

7 hours later 22004173 Anonymous
>>22003417 Slight correction: keratinization is the condition that best can be described as the surface of the glans becoming dry and somewhat rough. It happens to some intact people as well (the length of the foreskin varies, there are people who have the tip of their glans always exposed, no matter what). And it should not affect sensitivity much, and most people, intact or not, can't even reach orgasm by stimulating the glans alone. >>22003891 This. I was intact at 14 when I lost my virginity. That encounter was so mediocre that if it wouldn't have been my first time, I wouldn't even remember. Then I got cut, and I will always remember the first time I had sex after the procedure. I blasted a cumshot that was so powerful that I never imagined I could ever do, something you normally see only in porn. (And it's not because I was abstaining for long, I was jacking off as usual inbetween the surgery and the said encounter.) Unless it's a really botched circumcision (too tight, no inner foreskin left, skin bridges, damaged glans, etc), it shouldn't really make a difference. But you are like the third person this week who makes a thread like this, and the problem is, you won't listen to guys like me or >>22003891 who have actual before/after experience.

10 hours later 22004662 Anonymous
>>22004173 Choice when your older isn't the same as no choice at any age. I'm not saying your wrong just that your assertion that op is incorrect, is wrong. I'm natural so I don't even get why you would have it done or try to convince everyone else with your convenient testimonial. t.still has skin in the game

11 hours later 22004701 Anonymous
>>22004662 >your assertion that op is incorrect I never explicitly stated he's wrong. What I understand is people being so desperate about this, to the point that they falsely convince themselves that their penis is now totally useless, and that their life is over now. And let's not even get started with the so-called restoration, which, is just a waste of time: the skin you stretch to cover your glans is structurally different from the actual foreskin. Make no mistake, I'm against routine infant circumcision, it's a shit thing that has no place in a civilized country. I understand how bad it could feel that someone forced them into this when they were totally defenseless, and how it's a full-on violation of every basic human right. But, the thing is, Nothing. Can. Be. Done. About. It. It's done. It'll never grow back. So why all the hysteria? >I don't even get why you would have it done Medical reasons. My inner foreskin simply stopped producing any lubrication, it was as dry as the outside, and my glans were keratinized even though I was intact. While I had no trouble retracting the foreskin (I had no phimosis), once retracted, it would just bundle up behind the glans and never go back on its own, and it was really, like, REALLY fucking uncomfortable. (From a strict technological point of view, I think this is what people will end up with once they start restoring. Why on Earth would anyone choose this over accepting a perfectly normal circumcision?)

11 hours later 22004703 Anonymous
>>22004701 >What I understand *can't

14 hours later 22005227 Anonymous
>>22004662 >just that your assertion that op is incorrect, is wrong He has a point though. OP says he didn't enjoy sex much, and blames it on being cut, but there are lots of variables to sexual pleasure, and circumcision is not an obstacle to getting off for like 90%+ plus cut guys, which would indicate something else is the problem. >or try to convince everyone else with your convenient testimonial You sound like a conspiritard now. >>22004701 Good post, but I also think you're writing off restoration. A lot of people do it, and they report a huge increase in pleasure (and no physical inhibition like you mention), so it's still a valid idea to consider.

2.578 0.121